JB/014/360/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/360/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>A3<lb/>3</note>


<head>1829. June 2.</head>
<head>Article on Utilitarianism.</head>


<note>5<lb/>In Hartley on Man<lb/>greater but still<lb/>incomplete number<lb/>of species mentioned</note>
<p>In the year <!-- gap left for year --> appeared the work<lb/>
of David Hartley, Doctor of Physic, known by the short<lb/>
title of "Hartley on Man". It came out of the hands of<lb/>
the author in two volumes octavo: which two volumes<lb/>
were in <del>addition</del> an edition some years afterwards<lb/>
published by D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Priestley by elimination made of<lb/>
a quantity of useless or to use a quaint appellative<lb/>
once in vogue quis-quilious matter reduced to one.<lb/>
In this work of David Hartley's a greater number of<lb/>
species were it is believed ranked under the two<lb/>
genera of pain &amp; pleasure than are to be found<lb/>
in the work of Helvetius. Still however it<lb/>
was far from being all-comprehensive : far - <lb/>
widely far from being adequate to the demand <del>for</del><lb/>
which the application of this branch of art &amp; science<lb/>
to the purpose of giving direction to human conduct<lb/>
in the several walks of life public as well<lb/>
as private is continually presenting : as will be<lb/>
seen in <add>when</add> the work already alluded to comes to<lb/>
be distinctly brought to view.</p>
<note>6<lb/>Greatest happiness of<lb/>the greatest number<lb/>first mentioned by<lb/>Priestley A<hi rend="superscript">0</hi> 1762 &amp; 1769</note>
<p>Between the years 1762 &amp; 1769 <del>the</del> came<lb/>
out a pamphlet of D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Priestley's written as<lb/>
usual with him <hi rend="underline"><foreign>currente calamo</foreign></hi> and without<lb/>
any precise method predetermined but containing<lb/>
at the close of it it is believed in the very last<lb/>
page in so many words the phrase <hi rend="underline">the greatest<lb/>
happiness of the greatest number</hi>, and this<lb/>
was stated in the character of a principle<lb/>
constituting not only a rational foundation<lb/>
but the only rational foundation of all enactments<lb/>
in legislation and all rules and<lb/>
precepts destined for the direction of human<lb/>
conduct in private life.<lb/></p>
<p>Somehow</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

A3
3

1829. June 2. Article on Utilitarianism.

5
In Hartley on Man
greater but still
incomplete number
of species mentioned

In the year appeared the work
of David Hartley, Doctor of Physic, known by the short
title of "Hartley on Man". It came out of the hands of
the author in two volumes octavo: which two volumes
were in addition an edition some years afterwards
published by Dr. Priestley by elimination made of
a quantity of useless or to use a quaint appellative
once in vogue quis-quilious matter reduced to one.
In this work of David Hartley's a greater number of
species were it is believed ranked under the two
genera of pain & pleasure than are to be found
in the work of Helvetius. Still however it
was far from being all-comprehensive : far -
widely far from being adequate to the demand for
which the application of this branch of art & science
to the purpose of giving direction to human conduct
in the several walks of life public as well
as private is continually presenting : as will be
seen in when the work already alluded to comes to
be distinctly brought to view.

6
Greatest happiness of
the greatest number
first mentioned by
Priestley A0 1762 & 1769

Between the years 1762 & 1769 the came
out a pamphlet of Dr. Priestley's written as
usual with him currente calamo and without
any precise method predetermined but containing
at the close of it it is believed in the very last
page in so many words the phrase the greatest
happiness of the greatest number
, and this
was stated in the character of a principle
constituting not only a rational foundation
but the only rational foundation of all enactments
in legislation and all rules and
precepts destined for the direction of human
conduct in private life.

Somehow



Identifier: | JB/014/360/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

360

Info in main headings field

article on utilitarianism

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3 / f3

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5123

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in