JB/014/430/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/430/001: Difference between revisions

Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<note>17a</note>
<note>17a</note>


<p>John Locke's misconceptions of the end and object of government<lb/>
<p>John Locke's misconceptions of the end &amp; object of government<lb/>
was <del>exhibited</del> not only exhibited in his 'original contract' theory<lb/>
was <del>exhibited</del> not only exhibited in his 'original contract' theory<lb/>
but in the extremely narrow view taken by him of the regions<lb/>
but in the extremely narrow view taken by him of the regions<lb/>
of pains &amp; pleasures - &amp; by that notion of his that <del>the</del> Morals &amp; Politics <del><gap/></del> <add>are explainable by <del>exhibiting</del> the mere exhibition of</add> <del>are founded on</del> the relations <del>between</del> <add>which one</add> word <del>&amp; word</del> <add>bears to another</add>. Again<lb/>
of pains &amp; pleasures - &amp; by that notion of his that <del>the</del> Morals &amp;<lb/>
his doctrine <del><gap/></del> <add>respecting</add> <hi rend="underline">uneasiness</hi> as the <add><del><gap/></del></add> cause of action - as if a<lb/>
Politics <del><gap/></del> <add>are explainable by <del>exhibiting</del> the mere exhibition of</add> <del>are founded on</del> the relations <del>between</del> <add>which one</add> word <del>&amp; word</del> <add>bears to another</add>. Again<lb/>
his doctrine <del><unclear>about</unclear></del> <add>respecting</add> <hi rend="underline">uneasiness</hi> as the <add><del><gap/></del></add> cause of action - as if a<lb/>
man enjoying certain pleasures could not seek other pleasures in<lb/>
man enjoying certain pleasures could not seek other pleasures in<lb/>
addition - shows how <del>the</del> vaguely <del>notions <gap/> of ple</del> the ideas of pleasure<lb/>
addition - shows how <del>the</del> vaguely <del>notions <gap/> of ple</del> the ideas of pleasure<lb/>
presented themselves to his mind. <del>the <gap/> <unclear>For flattery toward</unclear></del> the<lb/>
presented themselves to his mind. <del>the <gap/> <unclear>For flattery toward</unclear></del> the<lb/>
right <del>of property as the <unclear>leading</unclear> ground</del> <add><del>fundamental principle</del></add> , <del>he had <gap/> <unclear>such</unclear></del><lb/>
right <del>of property as the <unclear>leading</unclear> ground</del> <add><del>fundamental principle</del></add> , <del>he had <gap/> <unclear>such</unclear></del><lb/>
an <del><gap/> and often <sic>maleficent</sic> cause, by misdirection</del> to<lb/>
an <del>erroneous and often <sic>malificent</sic> cause, by misdirection</del> to<lb/>
a <del>principle which unless subordinate to a <unclear>proper</unclear> &amp; <gap/><lb/>
a <del>principle which unless subordinate to a <unclear>proper</unclear> &amp; <gap/><lb/>
principle may be <unclear>made</unclear> the <gap/> against all<lb/>
principle may be made the <gap/> against all<lb/>
improvement - against all increase to human happiness</del> - as<lb/>
improvement - against all increase to human happiness</del> - as<lb/>
By <add>his theory of</add> the original contract an end <add>of government is advocated</add> is <hi rend="underline">proposed</hi> for other than<lb/>
By <add>his theory of</add> the original contract an end <add>of government is advocated</add> is <hi rend="underline">proposed</hi> for other than<lb/>
Line 23: Line 24:
as it is, - would be wholly unworthy to compete with the<lb/>
as it is, - would be wholly unworthy to compete with the<lb/>
Greatest Happiness Principle. For though in most cases observance<lb/>  
Greatest Happiness Principle. For though in most cases observance<lb/>  
of contracts is demanded by that principle, - yet their observance in  
of contracts is demanded by that principle, - yet their observance in<lb/>
all cases would be destructive of it. Suppose a contract entered<lb/>
all cases would be destructive of it. Suppose a contract entered<lb/>
into <add>by one individual</add> for the commission of a crime. Must <hi rend="underline">that</hi> contract be deemed<lb/>
into <add>by one individual</add> for the commission of a crime. Must <hi rend="underline">that</hi> contract be deemed<lb/>
Line 33: Line 34:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

17a

John Locke's misconceptions of the end & object of government
was exhibited not only exhibited in his 'original contract' theory
but in the extremely narrow view taken by him of the regions
of pains & pleasures - & by that notion of his that the Morals &
Politics are explainable by exhibiting the mere exhibition of are founded on the relations between which one word & word bears to another. Again
his doctrine about respecting uneasiness as the cause of action - as if a
man enjoying certain pleasures could not seek other pleasures in
addition - shows how the vaguely notions of ple the ideas of pleasure
presented themselves to his mind. the For flattery toward the
right of property as the leading ground fundamental principle , he had such
an erroneous and often malificent cause, by misdirection to
a principle which unless subordinate to a proper &
principle may be made the against all
improvement - against all increase to human happiness
- as
By his theory of the original contract an end of government is advocated is proposed for other than
that of its conduciveness to the felicity of the community. And
this end, even were it a fact - and not a fable, - a fiction, - and a falsehood -
as it is, - would be wholly unworthy to compete with the
Greatest Happiness Principle. For though in most cases observance
of contracts is demanded by that principle, - yet their observance in
all cases would be destructive of it. Suppose a contract entered
into by one individual for the commission of a crime. Must that contract be deemed
sacred - And what must be said of the contrivance by which every
body would be involved in a contract the operation of which might
be the destruction of pleasures, - & the continuation of pains, - should
experience prove that the pleasures might be preserved & the
pain alienated



Identifier: | JB/014/430/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

430

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial fleur de lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5193

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in