★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p>The four principles, thus brought to view<lb/> | <p>The four principles, thus brought to view<lb/> | ||
these four objects, being <del>different in name</del><lb/> | these four objects, being <del>different in name</del><lb/> | ||
<del>are of | <del>are of course</del> <add>more or less</add> different in nature as in name<lb/> | ||
will as such appear <unclear> | will as such appear <unclear>harsh</unclear> to disagree: in <sic>somuch</sic><lb/> | ||
that a measure suggested by | that a measure suggested by one may<lb/> | ||
be reprobated by another. Wherever this can<lb/> | be reprobated by another. Wherever this can<lb/> | ||
happen means must to found for adjusting<lb/> | happen means must to found for adjusting<lb/> | ||
the preeminence, or | the preeminence, or instead of light and safety<lb/> | ||
<add>these</add> our four landmarks would <add>but afford us</add> yield us nothing<lb/> | <add>these</add> our four landmarks would <add>but afford us</add> yield us nothing<lb/> | ||
but perplexity and confusion.</p> | but perplexity and confusion.</p> | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<add>present</add> offer themselves as standing on the same level:<lb/> | <add>present</add> offer themselves as standing on the same level:<lb/> | ||
Abundance and Equality on inferior ground.<lb/> | Abundance and Equality on inferior ground.<lb/> | ||
For without security, Equality may not <add>has no duration</add> | For without security, Equality may not <add>has no duration</add> outlive<lb/> | ||
the | the day: and without Subsistence there can<lb/> | ||
be no Abundance.<lb/></p> | be no Abundance.<lb/></p> | ||
<p>Thus is | <p>Thus it is with the objects themselves:<lb/> | ||
but with respect to the dispositions of law by <add>directed</add><lb/> | but with respect to the dispositions of law by <add>directed</add><lb/> | ||
<add>towards those objects</add> which the | <add>towards those objects</add> which the attainment of those objects is endeavoured<lb/> | ||
at, the <del><gap/></del> | at, the <del><gap/></del><add>proportions in point</add> of importance are widely<lb/> | ||
different. If <del><gap/></del> the laws which have had< | different. If <del><gap/></del> the laws which have had <add>subsistence</add></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
The four principles, thus brought to view
these four objects, being different in name
are of course more or less different in nature as in name
will as such appear harsh to disagree: in somuch
that a measure suggested by one may
be reprobated by another. Wherever this can
happen means must to found for adjusting
the preeminence, or instead of light and safety
these our four landmarks would but afford us yield us nothing
but perplexity and confusion.
At the first glance Security and Subsistence
present offer themselves as standing on the same level:
Abundance and Equality on inferior ground.
For without security, Equality may not has no duration outlive
the day: and without Subsistence there can
be no Abundance.
Thus it is with the objects themselves:
but with respect to the dispositions of law by directed
towards those objects which the attainment of those objects is endeavoured
at, the proportions in point of importance are widely
different. If the laws which have had subsistence
Identifier: | JB/032/002/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 32. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
032 |
civil code |
||
002 |
civil |
||
003 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
arthur young |
|||
9973 |
|||