★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- indent --> | <!-- indent --> | ||
<p>Thus far as such defects <add>as</add> which though<lb/> actually interwoven with the substance of the<lb/> institution are capable of being <add>extracted from</add> picked out of<lb/> it without <add>altering</add> changing its essence. It is a task<lb/> much easier and still more evidently necessary<lb/> to <add>clear away</add> separate from it and lay aside any circumstances<lb/> which though not belonging to this<lb/> species of tribunal more than to any other, are<lb/> likely in virtue of an accidental connection to<lb/> have had an influence <del>in the composition</del> <add>on the opinion generally<lb/></add> entertained of its utility</p> | <p>Thus far as such defects <add>as</add> which though<lb/> actually interwoven with the substance of the<lb/> institution are capable of being <add>extracted from</add> picked out of<lb/> it without <add>altering</add> changing its essence. It is a task<lb/> much easier and still more evidently necessary<lb/> to <add>clear away</add> separate from it and lay aside any circumstances<lb/> which though not belonging to this<lb/> species of tribunal more than to any other, are<lb/> likely in virtue of an accidental connection to<lb/> have had an influence <del>in the composition</del> <add>on the opinion generally<lb/></add> entertained of its utility</p> | ||
<!-- indent --> | |||
<p>Compare in an <sic>undistinguishing</sic> point of view<lb/> what is called Trial by Jury with the other modes<lb/> of trial which are most likely to be contrasted with<lb/> it, it is not only the best mode of trial, but<lb/> the only one which deserves the name. What <add>can</add> conclusion<lb/> <add>we infer</add> can be drawn from thence in favour of it?<lb/> None at all. Just nothing. Chaos has given to this <del><unclear>time</unclear></del> <add>tribunal</add></p> | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
2. Circumstances of advantage not belonging
to the institution, but accidentally connected
with it.
The same law of precision which requires
us to
Thus far as such defects as which though
actually interwoven with the substance of the
institution are capable of being extracted from picked out of
it without altering changing its essence. It is a task
much easier and still more evidently necessary
to clear away separate from it and lay aside any circumstances
which though not belonging to this
species of tribunal more than to any other, are
likely in virtue of an accidental connection to
have had an influence in the composition on the opinion generally
entertained of its utility
Compare in an undistinguishing point of view
what is called Trial by Jury with the other modes
of trial which are most likely to be contrasted with
it, it is not only the best mode of trial, but
the only one which deserves the name. What can conclusion
we infer can be drawn from thence in favour of it?
None at all. Just nothing. Chaos has given to this time tribunal
|
Identifier: | JB/035/024/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
024 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
10617 |
|||
