JB/035/062/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/035/062/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- indent -->    <p>Of this knot of principles, not to strain the conception<lb/> of the reader by <del>suspened</del> suspense I will<lb/> give a specimen though <del>the</del> not yet arrived at<lb/> that stage<add> part of the plan</add> of the investigation <add>inquiry</add> in which <del>the demonstration</del><lb/> their title to that character will come to be proved. <add>made out  demonstrated.</add></p>
<!-- indent -->    <p>Of this knot of principles, not to strain the conception<lb/> of the reader by <del>suspened</del> suspense I will<lb/> give a specimen though <del>the</del> not yet arrived at<lb/> that stage<add> part of the plan</add> of the investigation <add>inquiry</add> in which <del>the demonstration</del><lb/> their title to that character will come to be proved. <add>made out  demonstrated.</add></p>
<!-- each paragraph below is indented from its numeral -->
<!-- each paragraph below is indented from its numeral -->
<p>1. Rejection of witnesses <add>evidence</add> on a thousand frivolous and<lb/> discordant pretenses. Whereas no evidence of any<lb/> kind ought to rejected <add>in any pretense</add> not even for perjury nor for<lb/> any reason than its being a <gap/> one, and superseded<lb/> by an immediate <add> intervening</add> one intervening.</p>   
<p>1. Rejection of witnesses <add>evidence</add> on a thousand frivolous and<lb/> discordant pretenses. Whereas no evidence of any<lb/> kind ought to rejected <add>on any pretense</add> not even for perjury nor for<lb/> any reason than its being a <gap/> one, and superseded<lb/> by an immediate <add> intervening</add> one intervening.</p>   
 
<p>2. Refusal to examine the defendant in a penal<lb/> case as a wife against her husband</p>
 
<p>3. Refusal to examine the professional <unclear>confidents</unclear><lb/> of a defendant in a penal case</p>
 
<p>4. Refusal to employ <del>intermediates to</del> preparatory examinations<lb/> to trace out immediate proofs by the<lb/> help of remate in all penal cases but felonies.</p>
 
<p>5. Refusal in all cases but felonies to employ such<lb/> preparatory examinations for the purpose of securing<lb/> evidence from being lost.</p>
<p>6. Quashing convictions for mistakes <sic>wilful</sic> or incidental<lb/> on the part of a scribe, and <add>a thousand</add> other causes<lb/> <del>fo alt</del> equally foreign to the merits</p>
<p>7. Allowing persons known and unknown about<lb/> the thing  the power of <del>gr</del> rendering <add>penal</add> laws of no effect<lb/> by granting pardons either under that name after<lb/> conviction or before conviction under the name of a<lb/> <foreign><sic>noli</sic> prosequi</foreign> without special reason assigned and<lb/> without any reason at all.</p>




Line 25: Line 27:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Obj

Of this knot of principles, not to strain the conception
of the reader by suspened suspense I will
give a specimen though the not yet arrived at
that stage part of the plan of the investigation inquiry in which the demonstration
their title to that character will come to be proved. made out demonstrated.

1. Rejection of witnesses evidence on a thousand frivolous and
discordant pretenses. Whereas no evidence of any
kind ought to rejected on any pretense not even for perjury nor for
any reason than its being a one, and superseded
by an immediate intervening one intervening.

2. Refusal to examine the defendant in a penal
case as a wife against her husband

3. Refusal to examine the professional confidents
of a defendant in a penal case

4. Refusal to employ intermediates to preparatory examinations
to trace out immediate proofs by the
help of remate in all penal cases but felonies.

5. Refusal in all cases but felonies to employ such
preparatory examinations for the purpose of securing
evidence from being lost.

6. Quashing convictions for mistakes wilful or incidental
on the part of a scribe, and a thousand other causes
fo alt equally foreign to the merits

7. Allowing persons known and unknown about
the thing the power of gr rendering penal laws of no effect
by granting pardons either under that name after
conviction or before conviction under the name of a
noli prosequi without special reason assigned and
without any reason at all.









Identifier: | JB/035/062/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

35-36

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

062

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f61 / f62 / f63 / f64

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10655

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in