JB/035/069/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/069/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


5 Juries

Blackstone No: it is must be in consequence virtue not of its excellence merit
but of its badness depravity demerit unfitness unaptitude in the way
as a mode of judicature that this institution operates if at
all as a corrective in of what is bad amiss in the way of legislation.
Such is accordingly the character which I attribute
to it : and such is the character in which I
maintain defend it to be necessary : but of this a little
farther on.




Identifier: | JB/035/069/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

069

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

floyd & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10662

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in