★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<head>4</head><!-- written in pencil --> | <head>4</head><!-- written in pencil --> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
should be nominated by the Crown , but that this | should be nominated by the Crown , but that this | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
office of finance should < | office of finance should <sic><unclear>proportionatly</unclear></sic> be coupled | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
with judicature . Another argument I will help | with judicature . Another argument I will help | ||
| Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
most notoriously and beyond all comparison more | most notoriously and beyond all comparison more | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
so. Was the most corrupt tribunal of the | so. Was the most corrupt tribunal of the prominent | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>kind</add> ever charged with half the < | <add>kind</add> ever charged with half the <unclear>one</unclear> partiality | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
which on <add>in</add> this as will as so many other heads <add>branches</add> | which on <add>in</add> this as will as so many other heads <add>branches</add> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
of law is so notorious on the part of Juries ? Who | of law is so notorious on the part of Juries ? Who | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
ever heard of an unjust conviction given by | ever heard of an unjust conviction given by Commissioners | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
of Excise ? if <add>yet</add> such a thing had been but | of Excise ? if <add>yet</add> such a thing had been but | ||
| Line 51: | Line 50: | ||
suspected is it possible that the whole metropolis <add>town and</add> | suspected is it possible that the whole metropolis <add>town and</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
the whole notion would not have < | the whole notion would not have <sic>wrung</sic> with it? | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
How happens this ? in the first plan because they | How happens this ? in the first plan because they | ||
| Line 68: | Line 67: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
4 Juries
Beaufry I allow the honourable gentleman and only fear
has not allowing it me . It is bad , not that the
persons entrusted with the collection of the Revenue
should be nominated by the Crown , but that this
office of finance should proportionatly be coupled
with judicature . Another argument I will help
to against this tribunal : that the tribunals
of which a Jury forms a part have a public to
guard their probity , and this by — tribunal none.
Thus it stands upon principle : which says experience ?
With all these such gross and palpable faults is the
administration of justice then administered less
important than that administered by Juries ? It is
most notoriously and beyond all comparison more
so. Was the most corrupt tribunal of the prominent
kind ever charged with half the one partiality
which on in this as will as so many other heads branches
of law is so notorious on the part of Juries ? Who
ever heard of an unjust conviction given by Commissioners
of Excise ? if yet such a thing had been but
suspected is it possible that the whole metropolis town and
the whole notion would not have wrung with it?
How happens this ? in the first plan because they
have no temptation either of interest or prejudice to
act otherwise than justly : in the next plan , because
having their conduct to be the object of
suspicion they put a guard upon it accordingly.
I say repeat it : they have no temptation to
|
Identifier: | JB/035/074/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
074 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 / d3 / d4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
10667 |
|||
