JB/035/080/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/035/080/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Juries

Relative necessity That the decision of a Jury can scarce
have any guidance guide than caprice , I admitt
with sorrow : but where law obstinately abdicates Law is obstinate in ,
and Reason is at too great a distance abdicating , and the voice of Reason is too distant
to be heard , caprice can be the only guide.
Caprice against caprice , there can be no doubt
which to choose , that of the Jury which may
be favourable to liberty , and that of the Judge
which can never be otherwise than hostile to it.




Identifier: | JB/035/080/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

080

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

floyd & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10673

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in