★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
ValerieWallace (talk | contribs) Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, awardsmanage, Bureaucrats, giftadmin, staff, Administrators 193 edits No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/082/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/035/082/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1</head><lb/> | |||
<p><del>I have said the</del> <add>As matters stand at present in England this</add> institution, I have said, is <lb/> necessary. I have <sic>shewn</sic> why in its own nature<lb/> it is a bad one in its own nature. I have<lb/> pointed out its defects: I have <sic>shewn</sic> them | |||
<lb/> | |||
to be capital <add>radical</add> and incurable: and it is in<lb/> full view of these defects that without hesitation <add>under the reasons just mentioned</add><lb/> I pronounce it <add>at present</add> necessary. Why is it now<lb/> necessary? because it is so bad a mode of<lb/> judicature.<del> ?</del> how and to what end <add>for what purpose</add> is it necessary?<lb/> to palliate <add>as a <add>feeble</add> palliative </add> in some sort to the defects<lb/> in the state of legislation: to destroy laws which<lb/> <note>to enervate</note> <del>law</del> without this check which would destroy society: to<lb/> strike the sword out of hands which <del>would</del><lb/> want nothing but the removal of this <add>too</add> feeble defence<lb/> to give liberty its death; wound: in<lb/> a word to repeal in effect <del>that</del> the laws that have<lb/> been made by Judges.<lb/></p> | |||
| Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
I have said the As matters stand at present in England this institution, I have said, is
necessary. I have shewn why in its own nature
it is a bad one in its own nature. I have
pointed out its defects: I have shewn them
to be capital radical and incurable: and it is in
full view of these defects that without hesitation under the reasons just mentioned
I pronounce it at present necessary. Why is it now
necessary? because it is so bad a mode of
judicature. ? how and to what end for what purpose is it necessary?
to palliate as a <add>feeble palliative </add> in some sort to the defects
in the state of legislation: to destroy laws which
to enervate law without this check which would destroy society: to
strike the sword out of hands which would
want nothing but the removal of this too feeble defence
to give liberty its death; wound: in
a word to repeal in effect that the laws that have
been made by Judges.
|
Identifier: | JB/035/082/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
082 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
10675 |
|||
