JB/035/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/035/115/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- indent -->
<!-- indent -->
<p>Jury trial is a chance of arrangement, <add>as practiced in England in civil cases is composed of <add>includes</add></add> of which some<lb/> may be conducive, others indifferent, others adverse to the ends <lb/> <del>of justice</del> <add>of justice:  <del><unclear>taken</unclear> in <add>are</add> </del> the aggregate of those ends: arrangements of </add> of which some again may be conducive, others indifferent,<lb/> others again adverse to the particular <del>ad</del> ends, <del>&amp; which it</del> whatever  they<lb/> <add>may be,</add> its <unclear>subversion</unclear> of or supposed subversion to which is the <add>given efficient</add>cause<lb/> of the attachment manifested<add> around the institution</add> for it by its advocates.
<p>Jury trial is a chance of arrangement, <add>as practiced in England in civil cases is composed of <add>includes</add></add> of which some<lb/> may be conducive, others indifferent, others adverse to the ends <lb/> <del>of justice</del> <add>of justice:  <del>taken in <add>are</add> </del> the aggregate of those ends: arrangements of </add> of which some again may be conducive, others indifferent,<lb/> others again adverse to the particular <del>ad</del> ends, <del>&amp; which it</del> whatever  they<lb/> <add>may be,</add> its subversion of or supposed subversion to which is the <add>given efficient</add> cause<lb/> of the attachment manifested <add> around the institution</add> for it by its advocates.
</p>
</p>
<!-- indent -->
<!-- indent -->
<p>Without <del>new</del> regard to any of these distractions it is advocated<lb/> in the <unclear>lump</unclear>, it is opposed in the lump. By those<lb/> who advocate <add>it,</add> no idea is <gap/> of separating the tares from<lb/> the wheat of adopting the efficient and useful <add><gap/></add><unclear>points</unclear> of it<lb/> and clearing it of <add>the bad</add> those <add>objections</add> inconveniences which serve for arms<lb/> against it in the hands of its opponents. By those who<lb/> oppose <del>to</del> it, an little idea is <unclear>enlistment</unclear> of trying the words<lb/> of <unclear>trial</unclear>, and taking those features and those only, in which<lb/> its advocates can find a justification for the zeal <del>displayed</del><lb/> &amp; with which its introduction is <unclear>pursued</unclear>.</p>
<p>Without <del>new</del> regard to any of these distractions it is advocated<lb/> in the lump, it is opposed in the lump. By those<lb/> who advocate <add>it,</add> no idea is introduced of separating the tares from<lb/> the wheat of adopting the efficient and useful <add>features</add> points of it<lb/> and clearing it of <add>the bad</add> those <add>objections</add> inconveniences which serve for arms<lb/> against it in the hands of its opponents. By those who<lb/> oppose <del>to</del> it, an little idea is entertained of trying the words<lb/> of trial, and taking those features and those only, in which<lb/> its advocates can find a justification for the zeal <del>displayed</del><lb/> &amp; with which its introduction is pursued.</p>
<!-- indent -->     
<!-- indent -->     
<p>In Jury-trial, as practiced in England in civil cases<lb/> the following arrangements <add>features<add>circumstances</add></add> seem distinguishable and<lb/> if <del>are</del> <gap/> to influence the effect of it.</p>  
<p>In Jury-trial, as practiced in England in civil cases<lb/> the following arrangements <add>features<add>circumstances</add></add> seem distinguishable and<lb/> if <del>are</del> <unclear>entire</unclear> to influence the effect of it.</p>  
<!-- indent -->
<!-- indent -->
<p>Another point is the <gap/>. I do not mean<lb/> the <add>possibilities of</add> giving sure <gap/> in <gap/> in Jury trial <del><gap/></del><lb/> than even in civil causes is out of dispute: but the<lb/> <gap/> of giving to it that extent and <unclear>independency</unclear><lb/> <del>without</del> while the advocates seem to <add><gap/></add> <gap/> upon, and<lb/> without which it can not fall widely short of <unclear>their</unclear><lb/> wishes &#x2014; or at least of their declared wishes. </p>
<p>Another point is the <gap/>. I do not mean<lb/> the <add>possibility of</add> giving some <gap/> in <gap/> in Jury trial <del>mo</del><lb/> than even in civil causes is out of dispute: but the<lb/> <gap/> of giving to it that extent and <sic>independency</sic><lb/> <del>without</del> while the advocates seem to <add>count</add> rest  in upon, and<lb/> without which it can not fall widely short of <unclear>their</unclear><lb/> wishes &#x2014; or at least of their declared wishes. </p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Jury trial is a chance of arrangement, as practiced in England in civil cases is composed of <add>includes</add> of which some
may be conducive, others indifferent, others adverse to the ends
of justice of justice: taken in <add>are the aggregate of those ends: arrangements of </add> of which some again may be conducive, others indifferent,
others again adverse to the particular ad ends, & which it whatever they
may be, its subversion of or supposed subversion to which is the given efficient cause
of the attachment manifested around the institution for it by its advocates.

Without new regard to any of these distractions it is advocated
in the lump, it is opposed in the lump. By those
who advocate it, no idea is introduced of separating the tares from
the wheat of adopting the efficient and useful features points of it
and clearing it of the bad those objections inconveniences which serve for arms
against it in the hands of its opponents. By those who
oppose to it, an little idea is entertained of trying the words
of trial, and taking those features and those only, in which
its advocates can find a justification for the zeal displayed
& with which its introduction is pursued.

In Jury-trial, as practiced in England in civil cases
the following arrangements features<add>circumstances</add> seem distinguishable and
if are entire to influence the effect of it.

Another point is the . I do not mean
the possibility of giving some in in Jury trial mo
than even in civil causes is out of dispute: but the
of giving to it that extent and independency
without while the advocates seem to count rest in upon, and
without which it can not fall widely short of their
wishes — or at least of their declared wishes.



Identifier: | JB/035/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

1808-05-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10708

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in