JB/035/174/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/174/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>27 May  1808  6 </head>
<head>27 May  1808  6 </head>
<hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi> We speak here as capital convictions today<lb/>
<p><!-- indent -->
   
We shall hear no capital convictions today<lb/><!-- include penciled punctuation? -->said a certain Judge once to Judge <unclear>Karce</unclear> - - How<lb/> so? &#x2014; Why, yes sir that man there in the <sic>Jurybox</sic>. He has set his face against capital punishment.<lb/> So often as the <sic>offence</sic> is capital <del>to</del> it is<lb/> a rule with him to <sic>acquitt</sic> and his determination<lb/> being known, the others acquiesce in it.</p>  
 
<p><!-- indent -->
 
The prediction proved true: so long as that man<lb/> continued in the Jury box no capital conviction took<lb/> place. <del>This was related by</del> The relation <add><del>st</del></add> was given<lb/> by Judge <unclear>Karce</unclear> himself to <del>a relation of <gap/><add><del>was my own</del></add></del><lb/> <del>no more</del>, <add>a man of law, a man on whom I could depend,</add> who related it to me</p>.
 
<p><!-- indent -->
 
In this individual, in two contrasting <add>opposite</add> points of view<lb/>  <add>and two incorrect <gap/></add>
 
<add>at the same time </add> may be seen a picture of English justice.<add>criminal</add>  A predilection<lb/> for capital punishment, coupled with a predilection<lb/> equally strong for judicial <unclear>perjury</unclear>. Instead<lb/> of doing away both abominations, both kept up, and<lb/> the one employed to combat and defeat the other.</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

27 May 1808 6

We shall hear no capital convictions today
said a certain Judge once to Judge Karce - - How
so? — Why, yes sir that man there in the Jurybox. He has set his face against capital punishment.
So often as the offence is capital to it is
a rule with him to acquitt and his determination
being known, the others acquiesce in it.

The prediction proved true: so long as that man
continued in the Jury box no capital conviction took
place. This was related by The relation st was given
by Judge Karce himself to a relation of <add>was my own</add>
no more, a man of law, a man on whom I could depend, who related it to me

.

In this individual, in two contrasting opposite points of view
and two incorrect at the same time may be seen a picture of English justice.criminal A predilection
for capital punishment, coupled with a predilection
equally strong for judicial perjury. Instead
of doing away both abominations, both kept up, and
the one employed to combat and defeat the other.



Identifier: | JB/035/174/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

1808-05-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

174

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10767

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in