JB/035/216/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/216/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Four: <del>the</del> accordingly what is not a disadvantage<lb/>from the nature of the Judiciary is the cir-<lb/>-cumstance of not being provided with any such set<lb/>of rules  <del>But as dis</del><lb/><lb/>But a disadvantage which <add>as already observed<hi rend="superscript">+</hi></add> does seem <gap/>-<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> a. Ch.</note><lb/>-<gap/> from it is &#x2014; that is a comparative degree of<lb/><note>Were a set of rules<lb/>provided, juries would<lb/>not be qualified to<lb/>make the best use of<lb/>them.</note><lb/>unfitness relative being had to a freed Judicatory<lb/><gap/> for the <gap/> to the best account any such<lb/>set of rules as these in question, <gap/> then <gap/>.<lb/><lb/>What I do not mean to say, is that to a<lb/><note>It is not however meant<lb/>to say that Jury Judicature<lb/>would not be improved<lb/>by such rules.</note><lb/>jury in a set of instructions as this kind would be of<lb/>no use: or that <del>the effect would</del> <add><gap/></add> perplexity would<lb/>be a more probable result than useful guidance.<lb/>All I mean to say is &#x2014; that supposing the rules<lb/>framed, I should not expect to find the degree<lb/>of observance paid to them so <add>equally</add> exact in the case<lb/>of this unexperienced and <add><gap/> moveable</add> unbarred Judicatory as<lb/>the case of an experienced and permanent <add>Judicatory</add> one.<lb/>Suppose that <del>an in</del> facing the question of pecuniary<lb/>compensation on any given occasion the number of<lb/><gap/> to be <gap/> to be half a dozen.<lb/>one or two of them perhaps, if that were all, the<lb/><add>most inexperienced</add> Jury would be as well able to pay proper attention<lb/>as in the most experienced Judge: but when the number<lb/><gap/> to be ruled <del>to</del> so high as to half a <gap/><lb/>then comes the complexity, and with it the <add>comparative</add> inability<lb/><add>reference being had to the <gap/> state of Judges</add> to pay the proper attention to such a cluster of circumstances at once.
<head>31 May 1801</head>
 
<p>From: <del>the</del> accordingly what is not a disadvantage<lb/><gap/> from the nature of the Judiciary is the circumstance<lb/>  
of not being provided with any such set<lb/>of rules  <del>But as dis</del></p>
 
<p>But a disadvantage which <add>as already observed<hi rend="superscript">+</hi></add> does seem inseparable<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> a. Ch.</note><lb/>from it is &#x2014; that is a comparative degree of<lb/><note>Were a set of rules<lb/>provided, juries would<lb/>not be qualified to<lb/>make the best use of<lb/>them.</note><lb/>unfitness relative being had to a freed Judicatory<lb/>inaptitude for the turning to the best account any such<lb/>set of rules as these in question, supposing them framed.</p>
 
<p>What I do not mean to say, is that to a<lb/><note>It is not however meant<lb/>to say that Jury Judicature<lb/>would not be improved<lb/>by such rules.</note><lb/>jury in a set of instructions as this kind would be of<lb/>no use: or that <del>the effect would</del> <add><gap/></add> perplexity would<lb/>be a more probable result than useful guidance.<lb/>All I mean to say is &#x2014; that supposing the rules<lb/>framed, I should not expect to find the degree<lb/>of observance paid to them so <add>equally</add> exact in the case<lb/>of this unexperienced and <add><add>impermanent</add> moveable</add> untrained Judicatory as<lb/>the case of an experienced and permanent <add>Judicatory</add> one.<lb/>Suppose that <del>an in</del> facing the question of pecuniary<lb/>compensation on any given occasion the number of<lb/>circumstances to be attended to be half a dozen.<lb/>one or two of them perhaps, if that were all, the<lb/><add>most inexperienced</add> Jury would be as well able to pay proper attention<lb/>as in the most experienced Judge: but when the number<lb/><gap/> to be ruled <del>to</del> so high as to half a <gap/><lb/>then comes the complexity, and with it the <add>comparative</add> inability<lb/><add>reference being had to the experienced class of Judges</add> to pay the proper attention to such a cluster of circumstances at once.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

31 May 1801

From: the accordingly what is not a disadvantage
from the nature of the Judiciary is the circumstance
of not being provided with any such set
of rules But as dis

But a disadvantage which as already observed+ does seem inseparable
+ a. Ch.
from it is — that is a comparative degree of
Were a set of rules
provided, juries would
not be qualified to
make the best use of
them.

unfitness relative being had to a freed Judicatory
inaptitude for the turning to the best account any such
set of rules as these in question, supposing them framed.

What I do not mean to say, is that to a
It is not however meant
to say that Jury Judicature
would not be improved
by such rules.

jury in a set of instructions as this kind would be of
no use: or that the effect would perplexity would
be a more probable result than useful guidance.
All I mean to say is — that supposing the rules
framed, I should not expect to find the degree
of observance paid to them so equally exact in the case
of this unexperienced and <add>impermanent moveable</add> untrained Judicatory as
the case of an experienced and permanent Judicatory one.
Suppose that an in facing the question of pecuniary
compensation on any given occasion the number of
circumstances to be attended to be half a dozen.
one or two of them perhaps, if that were all, the
most inexperienced Jury would be as well able to pay proper attention
as in the most experienced Judge: but when the number
to be ruled to so high as to half a
then comes the complexity, and with it the comparative inability
reference being had to the experienced class of Judges to pay the proper attention to such a cluster of circumstances at once.




Identifier: | JB/035/216/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

1808-05-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

216

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

10809

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in