★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>Constitutional Code</head><lb/> | <head>Constitutional Code</head><lb/> | ||
The Gazette and <gap/> of <gap/> a obligation for<lb/> | The Gazette and <gap/> of <gap/> a obligation for<lb/> | ||
a <gap/> <gap/> | a <gap/> <gap/> a Judge <gap/> | ||
<p>Compared with the power of <del>an Engl</del> Jury with English <gap/><lb/> | <p>Compared with the power of <del>an Engl</del> Jury with English <gap/><lb/> | ||
the power of a Quasi Jury <del>wither</del> will in respect of <hi rend='underline'>effective</hi><lb/> | the power of a Quasi Jury <del>wither</del> will in respect of <hi rend='underline'>effective</hi><lb/> | ||
<hi rend='underline'>force</hi> be found much narrowed | <hi rend='underline'>force</hi> be found much narrowed <add>lessened</add>: on the other hand, in prospect<lb/> | ||
of extent even the field of Law and legislation much enlarged:<lb/> | of extent even the field of Law and legislation much enlarged:<lb/> | ||
rendered in a word | rendered in a word conclusive <add>consistent throughout</add> with that of the judicial power<lb/> | ||
itself.<lb/></p> | itself.<lb/></p> | ||
<p><gap/>dently to all instances into particulars the <unclear>reason</unclear> why.<lb/> | <p><gap/>dently to all instances into particulars the <unclear>reason</unclear> why.<lb/> | ||
the power of this body of Frenchmen is comparatively effective <add>rendered</add>thus<lb/> | the power of this body of Frenchmen is comparatively effective <add>rendered</add> thus<lb/> | ||
narrowed<add>narrowed</add> is, that the demand <add>for it</add>which under the English constitution<lb/> | narrowed <add>narrowed</add> is, that the demand <add>for it</add>which under the English constitution<lb/> | ||
is so urgent, leave us the Constitution dilemma in the proposal <lb/>Costs us power. In the English form of government the medium<lb/> | is so urgent, leave us the Constitution dilemma in the proposal <lb/>Costs us power. In the English form of government the medium<lb/> | ||
in which <add>Judges</add> as well as almost all the | in which <add>Judges</add> as well as almost all the functionaries have and <gap/><lb/> | ||
and here then being is in an atmosphere of corruption: the Judges<lb/> | and here then being is in an atmosphere of corruption: the Judges<lb/> | ||
careless and in effect and present cr<gap/> of the Monarch<lb/> | careless and in effect and present cr<gap/> of the Monarch<lb/> | ||
where <gap/> is <add>compleatly</add> hostile to that of the purpose: and at this<lb/> | where <gap/> is <add>compleatly</add> hostile to that of the purpose: and at this<lb/> | ||
<gap/> <gap/> in regard to responsibility, as well as respect of<lb/> | <gap/> <gap/> in regard to responsibility, as well as respect of<lb/> | ||
distructibility as <gap/>, violently effectually, and according <lb/> | <sic>distructibility</sic> as <gap/>, violently effectually, and according <lb/> | ||
to all expresses irresponsible.<lb/></p> | to all expresses irresponsible.<lb/></p> | ||
<p>This rule of | <p>This rule of <gap/> hurry <add>for its number</add> in all its parts a set of <unclear>some</unclear><lb/> | ||
when | when interest is a very branch of it in a state of correspondent<lb/> | ||
hostility to the proper, are great and perhaps the principal are<lb/> | hostility to the proper, are great and perhaps the principal are<lb/> | ||
and good <unclear> | and good effect of them | ||
<unclear>indelenting</unclear> cu<gap/>es in which it does intend<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <add>diversity of ideas efficiency</add>of are apart. every part to climb it | <gap/> <add>diversity of ideas <add>in</add> efficiency</add> of are apart. every part to climb it equates itself<lb/> | ||
in the body of the laws. In a view to undo what legislators<lb/> | in the body of the laws. . In a view to undo what legislators<lb/> | ||
and lawyers have done is the | and lawyers have done is the past use of Juries<lb/></p> | ||
In so far as what these <add>is <gap/> by those highest</add> <unclear> | <p>In so far as what these <add>is <del><gap/></del> done by those highest</add> indebted <unclear>unblameless</unclear> as rights<lb/> | ||
endeavour to the greatest happiness of the greatest number the installation<lb/> | endeavour to the greatest happiness of the greatest number the installation<lb/> | ||
of a Jury can not but a | of a Jury can not but a prejudicial - <del>a</del> <add>detraction </add> <unclear>distraction</unclear> from the <lb/> | ||
<gap/>of that same greatest happiness.<lb/> | <gap/> of that same greatest happiness.<lb/></p><pb/> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
'Click Here To Edit
1823 . August 28
Constitutional Code
The Gazette and of a obligation for
a a Judge
Compared with the power of an Engl Jury with English
the power of a Quasi Jury wither will in respect of effective
force be found much narrowed lessened: on the other hand, in prospect
of extent even the field of Law and legislation much enlarged:
rendered in a word conclusive consistent throughout with that of the judicial power
itself.
dently to all instances into particulars the reason why.
the power of this body of Frenchmen is comparatively effective rendered thus
narrowed narrowed is, that the demand for itwhich under the English constitution
is so urgent, leave us the Constitution dilemma in the proposal
Costs us power. In the English form of government the medium
in which Judges as well as almost all the functionaries have and
and here then being is in an atmosphere of corruption: the Judges
careless and in effect and present cr of the Monarch
where is compleatly hostile to that of the purpose: and at this
in regard to responsibility, as well as respect of
distructibility as , violently effectually, and according
to all expresses irresponsible.
This rule of hurry for its number in all its parts a set of some
when interest is a very branch of it in a state of correspondent
hostility to the proper, are great and perhaps the principal are
and good effect of them
indelenting cues in which it does intend
diversity of ideas <add>in efficiency</add> of are apart. every part to climb it equates itself
in the body of the laws. . In a view to undo what legislators
and lawyers have done is the past use of Juries
In so far as what these is done by those highest indebted unblameless as rights
endeavour to the greatest happiness of the greatest number the installation
of a Jury can not but a prejudicial - a detraction distraction from the
of that same greatest happiness.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/041/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1823-08-28 |
4-8 |
||
|
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
|
104 |
Constitutional Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D2 / E2 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
