JB/041/111/001

'Click Here To Edit

1823. August Sept.3
Constitutional Code

IV. Features, supposed apt, which not being found in the Jury
System are here, in the Quasi-Jury systems introduced.

So far as they have correspondent and opposite features in
the Quasi Jury system then have been already mentioned

1. Division of the every Quasi Jury into two sections: 1 the
more erudite: 2. the more popular: the more erudite: the more
popular the more numerous, than in case of disagreement the
will of thethose who belong to more numerous section may preponderate over the
will of the less those who belong to the most less numerous
section. the more those who belong to erudite section introduced that by the
influence of stronger understanding over understanding, then
who may be supposed positive to result in intellectual aptitude.
in whose intellectual aptitude may be refracted very guide
than who in whose instance appropriate moral aptitude
is most more probable, in so far as they think as proper to
be so guided

2 Allowing Allotting to the Jury Quasi Jury by law in express terms,
and thence with more comparativeness and more constant -surer effect the several functions herein
designated by the a several adjuncts auditors, subtive,
and consonant, and with more comparative effect than has
place in the case of a the Jury.

3. Stating in express terms the notion of the explanations
expected at the hands of the Judge for the use of the
Quasi Jury as also for the use of the others herein-after members
of the Public Opinion Tribunal.

4. Ordaining the registration of the discourses of the Quasi
Jurymen as well as those of the Judge is for the purpose of subjecting
these to responsibility these to the Judge in case of una discourse on this
past: and the Judge himself in case of disregard shown to
this discourse when its loth to regard shall appear unimpeachable.

5. Admission In <add>to the requests</add> secured, to any alterations amendment proposed by the
Quasi Jury or any member of it to the terms of the decision
debarred by the Judge: yet to us the Judge shall remain
at liberty to pay what regard to it he thinks proper: remaining thus
with his responsibility undiminished: the amendment being rif going after of common to the Judge Appelation for his adoption rejection, or modification.

Identifier: | JB/041/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.
Date_1	1823-09-03	Marginal Summary Numbering	27-32
Box	041	Main Headings	Constitutional Code
Folio number	111	Info in main headings field	Constitutional Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.	Page Numbering	D9 / E1
Penner		Watermarks	J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1822
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer	Jonathan Blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1822
Notes public		ID Number	001
Box Contents