★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>1827 Feb 8 + + Ch.</head> | <head>1827 Feb 8 + + Ch.</head> | ||
<p>Constitutional Code <gap/> Aug. 24 This to be<lb/> | <p>Constitutional Code <gap/> 1828 Aug. 24 This to be<lb/> | ||
preserved, in a Memorandum<lb/> | preserved, in a Memorandum<lb/> | ||
(1) relative to the copy sent to (4)<lb/> | (1) relative to the copy sent to (4)<lb/> | ||
Ratiocinative the Jury of the Netherlands</p> | |||
<note>Ch. XI Ministers severable<lb/> | <note>Ch. XI Ministers severable<lb/> | ||
S2 the Legislative Minister</note><lb/> | S2 the Legislative Minister</note><lb/> | ||
<p>Art. 23. <del>Why An</del> <add> | <p>Art. 23. <del>Why An</del> <add>Why an amendment</add> alteration why not <unclear>receivable</unclear><lb/> | ||
in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons</p> | in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons</p> | ||
<note>Art. 23. Ready written<lb/> | <note>Art. 23. Ready written<lb/> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
considered <lb/> | considered <lb/> | ||
alternatives</note><lb/> | alternatives</note><lb/> | ||
<p>1. Prevention of uncertainty When in this form the alternative<lb/> | |||
<p>1. Prevention of uncertainty When this form the alternative<lb/> | proposed to be made, is, <del>decided and</del> if the proposal be<lb/> | ||
proposed to be | adopted, actually made, the parts meant to be affected by<lb/> | ||
it, being expressly mentioned <add>certainty is the consequence</add> when by a fresh Statute, the<lb/> | it, being expressly mentioned <add>certainty is the consequence</add> when by a fresh Statute, the<lb/> | ||
text of the body of law about it <add>a</add> app<gap/>lies to being left, un<gap/>lled<lb/> | text of the body of law about it <add>a</add> app<gap/>lies to being left, un<gap/>lled<lb/> | ||
it may be | it may be matter of doubt and dispute what are the parts<lb/> | ||
meant to be affected.</p> | meant to be affected.</p> | ||
<head>(2)<lb/> | |||
<unclear>Ratiocinative</unclear></head> | |||
<p>2. Prevention of needless addition to the bulk of the Pannomiun<lb/> | |||
<del>whereby</del> by every such addition a <del><gap/> <gap/></del> proportionate<lb/> | |||
probability being produced of rendering a more or less considerable<lb/> | |||
portion of it incomprehensible to <del><gap/></del> a more or less considerable<lb/> | |||
portion of the individuals whose interests are affected by<lb/> | |||
it.</p> | |||
<p>To p.5</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<head>(4)<lb/> | |||
Instructional Exemplificational</head> | |||
<p>From p..5</p> | |||
<del>3</del>. <add>Art 24</add> In the ordinary mode no such adaptation is made<lb/> | |||
where the change is made <del>by</del> otherwise than by simple<lb/> | |||
repeat or simple addition. In so far as substitution<lb/> | |||
is intended, the effect produced in the <hi rend="underline">old</hi> matter by the <hi rend="underline">new</hi><lb/> | |||
is left questionable and open to argument: and pages in<lb/> | |||
any number are employed to do that what would have <lb/> | |||
been more <del>officially</del><add>effectually</add> done by a single line. [In English <add>(5)</add> Statute<lb/> | |||
law in instance <del><gap/></del> what been observed in what <add>the amount<add><del><gap/></del></add></add> a page <gap/> is <note><gap/> Memorandum<lb/> | |||
In the copy sent at<lb/> | |||
the bottom of page 4<lb/> | |||
is inserted in J.B's<lb/> | |||
hand the following Note<lb/> | |||
These headings not been<lb/> | |||
included for the present<lb/> | |||
occasion. but for the Code<lb/> | |||
only were in <unclear>the</unclear> former<lb/> | |||
<unclear>Sheets</unclear> inserted be<lb/> | |||
<unclear>mistaken</unclear> of a Copyists</note><lb/> | |||
employed in <del>the substitution of the</del> doing what would have<lb/> | |||
been done by the substitution of the word <hi rend="underline">or</hi> to the word <hi rend="underline">and</hi><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> Great lengthiness is <add><unclear>moreover</unclear></add> produced by designating, <del><gap/></del> as<lb/> | |||
otherwise there by <add>general and</add> <unclear>vague</unclear> description, the matter to what other<lb/> | |||
matter is intended to be substituted. "<hi rend="underline">So much</hi>" (in the whole<lb/> | |||
body of the law)" <hi rend="underline">as relates to</hi>" such or such a subject, naming it<lb/><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1827 Feb 8 + + Ch.
Constitutional Code 1828 Aug. 24 This to be
preserved, in a Memorandum
(1) relative to the copy sent to (4)
Ratiocinative the Jury of the Netherlands
Ch. XI Ministers severable
S2 the Legislative Minister
Art. 23. Why An Why an amendment alteration why not receivable
in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons
Art. 23. Ready written
form why necessitated
1. Prevention of uncertainty
2. Addition of needless
quantity
3. Severity against insufficiently
considered
alternatives
1. Prevention of uncertainty When in this form the alternative
proposed to be made, is, decided and if the proposal be
adopted, actually made, the parts meant to be affected by
it, being expressly mentioned certainty is the consequence when by a fresh Statute, the
text of the body of law about it a applies to being left, unlled
it may be matter of doubt and dispute what are the parts
meant to be affected.
(2)
Ratiocinative
2. Prevention of needless addition to the bulk of the Pannomiun
whereby by every such addition a proportionate
probability being produced of rendering a more or less considerable
portion of it incomprehensible to a more or less considerable
portion of the individuals whose interests are affected by
it.
To p.5
—
(4)
Instructional Exemplificational
From p..5
3. Art 24 In the ordinary mode no such adaptation is made
where the change is made by otherwise than by simple
repeat or simple addition. In so far as substitution
is intended, the effect produced in the old matter by the new
is left questionable and open to argument: and pages in
any number are employed to do that what would have
been more officiallyeffectually done by a single line. [In English (5) Statute
law in instance what been observed in what the amount<add></add> a page is Memorandum
In the copy sent at
the bottom of page 4
is inserted in J.B's
hand the following Note
These headings not been
included for the present
occasion. but for the Code
only were in the former
Sheets inserted be
mistaken of a Copyists
employed in the substitution of the doing what would have
been done by the substitution of the word or to the word and
Great lengthiness is moreover produced by designating, as
otherwise there by general and vague description, the matter to what other
matter is intended to be substituted. "So much" (in the whole
body of the law)" as relates to" such or such a subject, naming it
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/042/015/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-02-08 |
|||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
015 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d4 / e4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
12938 |
|||
