JB/042/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/019/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1826. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y..</hi> 28.</head><lb/>
<head>1826. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y..</hi> 28.</head><lb/>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head><lb/>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> <note>12 1839. May 19.</note><lb/>
<note>.1828 Aug 24<lb/>
1828 .Aug 24<lb/>
12 1839. May 19.<lb/>
<note>Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.<lb/>
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.<lb/>
12 §.2.11. Legislation Minister<lb/>
12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister<lb/>
Rationale</note><lb/>
Rationale</note><lb/>
<head>Used<lb/>
<del><hi rend="underline">R<gap/>atives</hi></del>
<del><hi rend="underline">R<gap/>atives</hi></del>
</head><lb/>
</head><lb/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<p>Art 20  [<unclear>Dejected.</unclear> <add><gap/></add>] Reasons for the <del>rejection</del> <hi rend="superscript"><add>dropping</add></hi> of <note>Art Reasons for dropping<lb/>
<p>Art 20  [Rejected. <add>Dropt</add>] Reasons for the <del>rejection</del> <add>dropping</add> of <note>Art Reasons for dropping<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> note <unclear>symmetriated</unclear><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> note symmetrical<del>ated</del><lb/>
amendments.<lb/>
amendments.<lb/>
In Judges hands<lb/>
In Judges hands<lb/>
this <gap/> is in the<lb/>
this initiative is in the<lb/>
most apt hands <del><gap/></del></note><lb/>
most apt hands <del><gap/></del></note><lb/>
amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical<lb/>
amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical<lb/>
Line 29: Line 29:
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands<lb/>
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands<lb/>
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties<lb/>
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties<lb/>
of <unclear>clearness,</unclear> correctness, all comprehensiveness,<lb/>
of <unclear>clearness,</unclear> correctness, all-comprehensiveness,<lb/>
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,<lb/>
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,<lb/>
much <hi rend="underline">waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</hi></add> saved.</hi></p>
much <hi rend="underline">waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</hi></add> saved.</hi></p>
 
<p>Art<add>37.iv.=</add><del>25.2</del> Under this condition, added to that of the <gap/>tion<add> <del>Instructional Ratiocinative</del><del><add>Not for <unclear>Netherlands</unclear> but <gap/></del></add></add><add><hi rend="underline">Instructional Ratiocinative</hi></add><del>,</del><lb/>
 
given to the proposed amendment by the motion <note><del>Note On this condition<lb/>
persons at large may<lb/>
<add>Art7</add> In <gap/> without<lb/>
<gap/> note a <lb/>
<gap/>(viz. the instruction)<lb/>
in legislation</del></note><lb/>
of one Member seconded by another <add>as per Ch. VI. <hi rend="underline">Legislature</hi> §.29. <hi rend="underline">Member's Motions</hi>,</add> a sort of share<lb/>
in legislation is capable of being imparted- not only<lb/>
to Ministers-Members as they are of the Legislative<lb/>
body, as to every right but that of voting,<add>-</add>but also<lb/>
to <hi rend="underline">persons at large</hi> considered as member of the Constitutive:<lb/>
<add><del><gap/></del></add> And this, <add>too,</add> without preponderant inconvenience.<lb/>
See Ch. XII. <hi rend="underline">Judiciary Collectively
</hi> §.19. <hi rend="underline">Judges'</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">contested interpretation-reporting junction</hi>: §.20.<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Judges' eventually-emendative function</hi>: §.<hi rend="underline">21. Judges'</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Sistitive function</hi>: §.22. <hi rend="underline">Judges' preinterpretative function</hi></p>
<p>Art.</p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:51, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1826. Feby.. 28.
Constitutional Code. 12 1839. May 19.
1828 .Aug 24
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.
12 §.2.11. Legislation Minister
Rationale

Used
Ratives


Art 20 [Rejected. Dropt] Reasons for the rejection dropping of Art Reasons for dropping
note symmetricalated
amendments.
In Judges hands
this initiative is in the
most apt hands

amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical
form.

1. In the case where the proposed amendment is
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. Judiciary
Collectively,
S.20. Eventually emendative function,
indication of a supposed demand for amendment
has, in the exercise of such his functions been made,-
the task of giving expressions to the amendment, on the
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties
of clearness, correctness, all-comprehensiveness,
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,
much waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</add> saved.</hi>

Art37.iv.=25.2 Under this condition, added to that of the tion Instructional Ratiocinative<add>Not for Netherlands but </add>Instructional Ratiocinative,
given to the proposed amendment by the motion Note On this condition
persons at large may
Art7 In without
note a
(viz. the instruction)
in legislation

of one Member seconded by another as per Ch. VI. Legislature §.29. Member's Motions, a sort of share
in legislation is capable of being imparted- not only
to Ministers-Members as they are of the Legislative
body, as to every right but that of voting,-but also
to persons at large considered as member of the Constitutive:
And this, too, without preponderant inconvenience.
See Ch. XII. Judiciary Collectively §.19. Judges'
contested interpretation-reporting junction: §.20.
Judges' eventually-emendative function: §.21. Judges'
Sistitive function: §.22. Judges' preinterpretative function

Art.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/042/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-02-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d12 / e12

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham; sir john bowring

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"used"

ID Number

12942

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in