★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<head>1826. Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> 22?</head> | <head>1826. Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> 22?</head> | ||
<head>Constitutional Code</head> | <head>Constitutional Code</head> | ||
<note>Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively<lb/> | |||
<p>1.<lb/> Objection-imperative<lb/> functions stated as | S.9. Elementary functions</note> | ||
<p>1.<lb/> Objection-imperative<lb/> functions stated as necessarily<lb/> common to<lb/> all Judges- why more<lb/> necessary than in Danish<lb/> Conciliatory<lb/> Courts?</p> | |||
<p>2.<lb/> Answer By proposed<lb/> system, all the good<lb/> done by Conciliatory<lb/> Courts will be done,<lb/> and a great deal more<lb/> which they could not<lb/> do.</p> | <p>2.<lb/> Answer By proposed<lb/> system, all the good<lb/> done by Conciliatory<lb/> Courts will be done,<lb/> and a great deal more<lb/> which they could not<lb/> do.</p> | ||
<p>3.<lb/> In Conciliatory<lb/> Courts, Evidence in<lb/> many cases must<lb/> have been deficient<lb/> or partial.</p> | <p>3.<lb/> In Conciliatory<lb/> Courts, Evidence in<lb/> many cases must<lb/> have been deficient<lb/> or partial.</p> | ||
<p>4.<lb/> Of compulsory evidence<lb/> no means of | <p>4.<lb/> Of compulsory evidence<lb/> no means of procurement.</p> | ||
<p>5.<lb/>Means of securing ge<lb/>nuineness and veracity,<lb/> none.</p> | <p>5.<lb/>Means of securing ge<lb/>nuineness and veracity,<lb/> none.</p> | ||
<p>6.<lb/> The Judicatory many<lb/> seated, consequent<lb/> inconvenience.</p> | <p>6.<lb/> The Judicatory many<lb/> seated, consequent<lb/> inconvenience.</p> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
<p>8.<lb/> True it is, that the<lb/> good done was done<lb/> without expence to the<lb/> public.</p> | <p>8.<lb/> True it is, that the<lb/> good done was done<lb/> without expence to the<lb/> public.</p> | ||
<pb/> | <pb/> | ||
<p>9.<lb/> No reason why the<lb/> saving made there<lb/> should not be made<lb/> under the here | <p>9.<lb/> No reason why the<lb/> saving made there<lb/> should not be made<lb/> under the here proposed<lb/> system.</p> | ||
<p>10.<lb/> Of the economy | <p>10.<lb/> Of the economy resulting<lb/> from proposed<lb/> systems, strong presumptive<lb/> evidence</p> | ||
<p>11. Though remuneration<lb/> given, it is cut down<lb/>to the smallest portion<lb/> each person will be<lb/> content to take.</p> | <p>11. Though remuneration<lb/> given, it is cut down<lb/>to the smallest portion<lb/> each person will be<lb/> content to take.</p> | ||
<p>12. Objections to small<lb/>ness of remuneration<lb/> the prodigious mass<lb/>of scientific | <p>12. Objections to small<lb/>ness of remuneration<lb/> the prodigious mass<lb/> of scientific informations<lb/> required on<lb/> the part of the Judge.</p> | ||
<p>13.<lb/> Under proposed Penal<lb/> and Procedure Code,<lb/> the requisite | <p>13.<lb/> Under proposed Penal<lb/> and Procedure Code,<lb/> the requisite scientific<lb/> information minimized.</p> | ||
<p>14.<lb/> Government Advocate's<lb/>functions-<lb/>1. In an imediate<lb/> Judicatory-<lb/>2. in an Appellate<lb/> Judicatory.</p> | <p>14.<lb/> Government Advocate's<lb/>functions-<lb/>1. In an imediate<lb/> Judicatory-<lb/>2. in an Appellate<lb/> Judicatory.</p> | ||
<p>15.<lb/> Elementary | <p>15.<lb/> Elementary Advocate's<lb/> functions<lb/>1. In an imediate<lb/> Judicatory-<lb/>2. in an Appellate<lb/> Judicatory.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Ch. 13. 1827. Novr. 20 copied.
1826. Augt 22?
Constitutional Code
Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively
S.9. Elementary functions
1.
Objection-imperative
functions stated as necessarily
common to
all Judges- why more
necessary than in Danish
Conciliatory
Courts?
2.
Answer By proposed
system, all the good
done by Conciliatory
Courts will be done,
and a great deal more
which they could not
do.
3.
In Conciliatory
Courts, Evidence in
many cases must
have been deficient
or partial.
4.
Of compulsory evidence
no means of procurement.
5.
Means of securing ge
nuineness and veracity,
none.
6.
The Judicatory many
seated, consequent
inconvenience.
7.
So waste of time to
Judges all but one
8.
True it is, that the
good done was done
without expence to the
public.
---page break---
9.
No reason why the
saving made there
should not be made
under the here proposed
system.
10.
Of the economy resulting
from proposed
systems, strong presumptive
evidence
11. Though remuneration
given, it is cut down
to the smallest portion
each person will be
content to take.
12. Objections to small
ness of remuneration
the prodigious mass
of scientific informations
required on
the part of the Judge.
13.
Under proposed Penal
and Procedure Code,
the requisite scientific
information minimized.
14.
Government Advocate's
functions-
1. In an imediate
Judicatory-
2. in an Appellate
Judicatory.
15.
Elementary Advocate's
functions
1. In an imediate
Judicatory-
2. in an Appellate
Judicatory.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/148/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-08-22 |
1-15 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
148 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
13071 |
|||
