JB/042/811/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:52, 4 February 2020

Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight
the continually encreasing mass of solemn falshoods!.
More particularly when the flavour of them, is height-
ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank
of perjury: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood
in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,
and an instrument in the hand of every crime, never,
on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the
exclusion of it.

☞ 23 March 1832. Is this proper? Are they the better for it?
respectively? If so, shew how.

☞ 23 March 1832. The word Observation does
not match with the new-employed phraseology. Would
not Instrumental be the proper word?

Identifier: \| JB/042/811/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1832-03-23	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	811	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13734
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p>Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight<lb/> the continually <sic>encreasing</sic> mass of solemn <sic>falshoods</sic>!<lb/>more particularly when the flavours of them, <add>is</add> height-<lb/>ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank<lb/> of <hi rend="underline">perjury</hi>: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood<lb/> in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,<lb/> and an instrument in the hand of every crime, ne<lb/>-ver, on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the<lb/> exclusion of it.</p>
+<p>Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight<lb/> the continually <sic>encreasing</sic> mass of solemn <sic>falshoods!</sic>.<lb/>More particularly when the flavour of them, <add>is</add> height-<lb/>ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank<lb/> of <hi rend="underline">perjury</hi>: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood<lb/> in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,<lb/> and an instrument in the hand of every crime, never,<lb/>on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the<lb/> exclusion of it.</p>
+<p>☞ 23 March 1832. Is this proper? Are they the better for it?<lb/> respectively? If so, <sic>shew</sic> how.</p>
+<p>☞ 23 March 1832. The word Observation does<lb/> not match with the new-employed phraseology. Would<lb/> not Instrumental be the proper word?</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/042/811/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:52, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search