JB/044/158/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/044/158/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Will they never be able to persuade<lb/>themselves that the provision made for the reward<lb/> of merit in the persons of these objects of kind<lb/>regard is too ample, or by any amount more than<lb/>sufficient? Yes: when those so illustriously public<lb/> spirited philanthropic and disinterested public<lb/>characters are arrived at that same persuasion</p>
 
<p>The clause requiring a Senator not<lb/> to be less than 30 years of age, must not be omitted.<lb/> Looked at a little beyond the surface, this will be found<lb/> to belong to the catalogue of nugatory securities&#x2014; a<lb/>catalogue of no inconsiderable length in the<lb/> field of legislation.</p>
 
<p>It is grounded on mere theory&#x2014;<lb/>loose and superficial theory&#x2014; not only not supported <lb/> by experience, but even opposed by appropriate <lb/>experience.</p>
<p>1. Under thirty years of age, if a man is<lb/> likely to be less apt than a man above that age in<lb/> some respects, he is likely to be more apt in other<lb/> respects: and those in which he is likely to be <del>less</del><lb/>most apt, are of the greatest consequence.</p>
<p>In</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:53, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Will they never be able to persuade
themselves that the provision made for the reward
of merit in the persons of these objects of kind
regard is too ample, or by any amount more than
sufficient? Yes: when those so illustriously public
spirited philanthropic and disinterested public
characters are arrived at that same persuasion

The clause requiring a Senator not
to be less than 30 years of age, must not be omitted.
Looked at a little beyond the surface, this will be found
to belong to the catalogue of nugatory securities— a
catalogue of no inconsiderable length in the
field of legislation.

It is grounded on mere theory—
loose and superficial theory— not only not supported
by experience, but even opposed by appropriate
experience.

1. Under thirty years of age, if a man is
likely to be less apt than a man above that age in
some respects, he is likely to be more apt in other
respects: and those in which he is likely to be less
most apt, are of the greatest consequence.

In



Identifier: | JB/044/158/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

044

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

158

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c11 f43 / c12 f44

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

13943

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in