JB/050/041/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/041/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Batch upload Box 50 - first attempt - fingers crossed
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>CERTAINTY - Inexecution Interest: individual x general. <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
 
<p>An interest is <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> only, when a benefit accrues<lb/>
to a given person on the supposition<lb/>
of a number of persons observing a certain<lb/>
conduct at once, &amp; not otherwise-</p>
 
<p>Persons are <hi rend='underline'>individually</hi> interested, when upon<lb/>
each person's observing a certain conduct, <del>happening</del> <add>profit</add><lb/>
accrues to that person, &amp; not observing <del>it</del>, loss. <lb/><note>immediate - remote</note></p>
 
<p>In order to know <add>(<foreign>a priori</foreign>)</add> whether a Law will be executed<lb/>
or no, there is but one method <add>way</add>, but it<lb/>
is a certain one.</p>
 
<p><note>Denominations</note> <lb/> Make out a list of [all the] <add>the normal</add> different classes<lb/>
of persons who, from the first to the last, are<lb/>
concerned in the execution - Carry your eye along<lb/>
that list, from the individual from whom<lb/>
information is to come of the offence [down] to the<lb/>
officer by whose hands Punishment is to be inflicted.</p>
 
<p>If upon every person in that list it be so <sic>order'd</sic> that<lb/>
a portion of <unclear>clear</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> enjoyment <unclear>devolves</unclear> upon his performing &amp; of &amp;c</note>
&amp; of sufferance upon his not performing<lb/>
that part which is competent to him- it is well -</p>
<pb/>
 
<head><hi rend='superscript'>2</hi><lb/></head>
 
<p>That [Substantive] Law will be executed.</p>
 
<p>If the succession is broken in any one instance<lb/>
if at any stage there be found a naked precept,<lb/>
<del>without</del> a precept unprovided with a<lb/>
Sanction strong enough <add>according to the circumstances of the person</add> to surmount the <gap/>,<lb/>
or the <add>notion</add> counter-interest that may oppose<lb/>
it's observance, the whole fabric crumbles<lb/>
That Law will not be executed.</p>
 
<p>It is not (however) <del><gap/></del> necessary that in every <unclear>inst</unclear><!-- word cut off at edge of page --> <add><unclear>article</unclear></add><!-- word cut off at edge of page --> <lb/>
the Sanction be an artificial one of the<lb/>
Law's providing</p>
 
<p>Put the question concerning every person by <add>on</add> whom<lb/>
something <del>comes</del> <add>devolves</add> to be done in the course of<lb/>
this. . . . . . What will be the consequence<lb/>
<add>to him</add> if he does it not?
<note>What is <add>will be</add> about to happen to him</note>
unless the answer <gap/><!-- word cut off at edge of page --> <lb/>
something unpleasant, <add>unpleasant to a degree superior to that of the unpleasantness of <add>doing</add></add> the Law will not be <del>exe</del> <add>executed</add></p> <pb/>
 
<head><hi rend='superscript'>3</hi></head>
 
<p>Now that something unpleasant is not all of one kind.<lb/>
It may consist in the acting against established<lb/>
<add>moral</add> propensity whether implanted by nature or by education:<lb/>
in the incurring of loss of reputation <hi rend='superscript'>[++]</hi>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>[++]</hi> where the Stature in less is such as behaves to confer <add>conciliate</add> a <unclear>Fund</unclear> of Reputation to the occupier</note><lb/>
<add>in the foregoing of any of those special <add>individual</add> rewards <del>which Laws</del></add><lb/>
in fine, in the suffering of <add>any of</add> those Punishments<lb/>
of positive establishment which Laws <add><del>they</del></add> <del>inflict</del> <add>hold out</add></p>
 
<p>It is observed that <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><lb/>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> where punishment is natural, its devolution depends no further when artificial, it goes on in the same train of dependence with the <add>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> substantive</add> Punishment to the</note></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<head><hi rend='superscript'>4</hi></head>
 
<p>For a thing to be done, those who are to do it,<lb/>
be interested <hi rend='underline'>individually</hi> &#x2014; a <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> Interest<lb/>
is as none.
<lb/>
<note>Each must find an advantage to himself immediately consequent upon his own [particular act [singly]</note></p>
 
<p>The confounding of these 2 different species (<gap/><!-- word cut off at edge of page --> <lb/>
they may be so termed) of Interest, is the <foreign>ignis</foreign><lb/>
<foreign><unclear>fatuus</unclear></foreign> by which vulgar Politicians in their<lb/>
Theories are <sic>bewilder'd</sic>; &amp; the rock against<lb/>
which their projects split. [And <del>this was</del> <add><unclear>examples</unclear> <add>of</add></add><lb/>
this are more especially frequent in <add>reasonings on</add> Political<lb/>
<sic>Oeconomy</sic>.]</p>
 
<p><hi rend='underline'>In their Theories</hi> - you shall see a man<lb/>
proving well or ill that a certain conduct is<lb/>
advantageous to a certain nation - that <gap/><!-- word cut off at edge of page --> <lb/>
you shall see him pass on <add>in</add> to an <del><gap/></del> <add>ecstacy</add><lb/>
<del><unclear>under</unclear></del> <add>amazement</add> that it is not pursued - to account<lb/>
for this, <note>stamp it for Utopian</note> his <del><unclear>his</unclear></del> philosophy furnishes him with<lb/>
but two suppositions &#x2014; either that (<unclear>contrary</unclear><!-- end of word cut off at edge of page --> <lb/>
to a fundamental maxim in science of<lb/>
humanity) [<unclear>the</unclear><del>]</del> <unclear>than</unclear> [in <unclear>action</unclear>] act contrary <add>counter</add></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

CERTAINTY - Inexecution Interest: individual x general. 1

An interest is general only, when a benefit accrues
to a given person on the supposition
of a number of persons observing a certain
conduct at once, & not otherwise-

Persons are individually interested, when upon
each person's observing a certain conduct, happening profit
accrues to that person, & not observing it, loss.
immediate - remote

In order to know (a priori) whether a Law will be executed
or no, there is but one method way, but it
is a certain one.

Denominations
Make out a list of [all the] the normal different classes
of persons who, from the first to the last, are
concerned in the execution - Carry your eye along
that list, from the individual from whom
information is to come of the offence [down] to the
officer by whose hands Punishment is to be inflicted.

If upon every person in that list it be so order'd that
a portion of clear [+] [+] enjoyment devolves upon his performing & of &c & of sufferance upon his not performing
that part which is competent to him- it is well -


---page break---

2

That [Substantive] Law will be executed.

If the succession is broken in any one instance
if at any stage there be found a naked precept,
without a precept unprovided with a
Sanction strong enough according to the circumstances of the person to surmount the ,
or the notion counter-interest that may oppose
it's observance, the whole fabric crumbles
That Law will not be executed.

It is not (however) necessary that in every inst article
the Sanction be an artificial one of the
Law's providing

Put the question concerning every person by on whom
something comes devolves to be done in the course of
this. . . . . . What will be the consequence
to him if he does it not? What is will be about to happen to him unless the answer
something unpleasant, unpleasant to a degree superior to that of the unpleasantness of <add>doing</add> the Law will not be exe executed


---page break---

3

Now that something unpleasant is not all of one kind.
It may consist in the acting against established
moral propensity whether implanted by nature or by education:
in the incurring of loss of reputation [++] [++] where the Stature in less is such as behaves to confer conciliate a Fund of Reputation to the occupier
in the foregoing of any of those special <add>individual rewards which Laws</add>
in fine, in the suffering of any of those Punishments
of positive establishment which Laws they inflict hold out

It is observed that +
+ where punishment is natural, its devolution depends no further when artificial, it goes on in the same train of dependence with the 1st substantive Punishment to the


---page break---

4

For a thing to be done, those who are to do it,
be interested individually — a general Interest
is as none.
Each must find an advantage to himself immediately consequent upon his own [particular act [singly]

The confounding of these 2 different species (
they may be so termed) of Interest, is the ignis
fatuus by which vulgar Politicians in their
Theories are bewilder'd; & the rock against
which their projects split. [And this was examples <add>of</add>
this are more especially frequent in reasonings on Political
Oeconomy.]

In their Theories - you shall see a man
proving well or ill that a certain conduct is
advantageous to a certain nation - that
you shall see him pass on in to an ecstacy
under amazement that it is not pursued - to account
for this, stamp it for Utopian his his philosophy furnishes him with
but two suppositions — either that (contrary
to a fundamental maxim in science of
humanity) [the] than [in action] act contrary counter




Identifier: | JB/050/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

certainty inexecution interest: individual & general

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16032

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in