★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
A 1<lb/ | <head>A 1<lb/>CERTAINTY Form of Comm Law. Disadvantages of.</head> | ||
<p>The very Friction which <add>gives foundation to</add> <del>runs through</del> & cleaves to<lb/>the very essence of the Common Laws <del>is</del> <add>subjects it <del>to</del></add> runs<lb/><add>perpetually to run</add> counter to the purposes of true Policy.</p> | |||
<p>The <add>course of the</add> Common Lawyer as of the Algebraist, is to set<lb/>out with supposing his work done: the question is,<lb/>always, <add>not what shall be, but how</add> what <hi rend="underline">is</hi> the common Law: now what<lb/><add>ever</add> <del>it</del> is, <add>now,</add> is what it is already; whereas what is not<lb/>as yet, but remains to be made to be, may, where<lb/>so made,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> be accommodated to the exigencies of the<lb/>present time.<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi><del>may</del> be governed <add>marked out</add> by<lb/>this improved reasoning.</note></p> | |||
<p>Hence it is that in common Law, a reason<lb/>may be competent that is no ways founded upon <add>and end with</add><lb/><note>I except here, the general<lb/>expediency of maintaining<lb/>uniformity which runs<lb/>alike through <del>the whole</del> <add>all decisions</add><lb/>& has no particular application<lb/> to any one.</note><lb/>[any particular] expediency: & <add>in effect</add> therefore, <del>Reason</del> <add>the word</add><lb/>Reason as applied to Common & to Statute Law<lb/>has two different significations: in the latter, it<lb/>denotes the <add>special</add> expediency of that particular provision to which<lb/>it is applied: in the latter, only that general expediency which<lb/>results from its concurring and the general plan of uniformity<lb/>of <gap/>, and of restraint upon the Judge: in the latter it means<lb/>a <hi rend="underline">Justification</hi>, in the former <hi rend="underline">only a cause:</hi> in the latter, it<lb/>accounts for <hi rend="underline">"why it ought to be;"</hi> in the latter, simply for <hi rend="underline">"why it is."</hi></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
A 1
CERTAINTY Form of Comm Law. Disadvantages of.
The very Friction which gives foundation to runs through & cleaves to
the very essence of the Common Laws is subjects it to runs
perpetually to run counter to the purposes of true Policy.
The course of the Common Lawyer as of the Algebraist, is to set
out with supposing his work done: the question is,
always, not what shall be, but how what is the common Law: now what
ever it is, now, is what it is already; whereas what is not
as yet, but remains to be made to be, may, where
so made,+ be accommodated to the exigencies of the
present time.
+may be governed marked out by
this improved reasoning.
Hence it is that in common Law, a reason
may be competent that is no ways founded upon and end with
I except here, the general
expediency of maintaining
uniformity which runs
alike through the whole all decisions
& has no particular application
to any one.
[any particular] expediency: & in effect therefore, Reason the word
Reason as applied to Common & to Statute Law
has two different significations: in the latter, it
denotes the special expediency of that particular provision to which
it is applied: in the latter, only that general expediency which
results from its concurring and the general plan of uniformity
of , and of restraint upon the Judge: in the latter it means
a Justification, in the former only a cause: in the latter, it
accounts for "why it ought to be;" in the latter, simply for "why it is."
Identifier: | JB/050/066/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
050 |
procedure code |
||
066 |
certainty form of comm. law disadvantages of |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
gr |
||
16057 |
|||