JB/051/209/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/209/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
would be the worst <add>only bad</add> Court of Judicature in the Kingdom<lb/>
would be the worst <add>only bad</add> Court of Judicature in the Kingdom<lb/>
if it could spare time: and it has none to spare.</p>
if it could spare time: and it has none to spare.</p>
<p>I make no scruple of allowing it to alter<lb/>
the decree, upon the terms of passing censure on the<lb/>
author. <add>Even in</add> A prosecution with that for its object is<lb/>
<add>more than I expect ever</add> what I expect to see happen. <del>As</del> In England<lb/>
appeals <del>for</del> from the Chancellor [judging in the first<lb/>
instance to the House of Lords on the ground of<lb/>
mere error in judgment happen half a dozen <add>several times</add> or<lb/>
a dozen times in a year: prosecutions <add>impeachments</add> for wilful<lb/>
bad judgment, as I have said already, never.</p>
<p><del>The</del> It can do no harm therefore to give this<lb/>
power: it would do some harm to with-hold it. To<lb/>
determine that there has been an injury, and that<lb/>
a wilful one done by a man in high office, and<lb/>
at the same time refuse redress would be a melancholy<lb/>
decision and an useless shock to the feelings of<lb/>
mankind. <add>Injury</add></p>
<pb/> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1

Observations on Mr B's Draught Tit. X. art. 3.

Committee's Draught Tit. II. art. 6.

High Court I allow of no alteration in the to be made by
the Nation-Assembly-Court in the decree of the
Metropolitan Court — I have already said why why? because I do not
mean to turn the National Assembly into an ordinary
Court of Judicature: I have already said why: it
would be the worst only bad Court of Judicature in the Kingdom
if it could spare time: and it has none to spare.

I make no scruple of allowing it to alter
the decree, upon the terms of passing censure on the
author. Even in A prosecution with that for its object is
more than I expect ever what I expect to see happen. As In England
appeals for from the Chancellor [judging in the first
instance to the House of Lords on the ground of
mere error in judgment happen half a dozen several times or
a dozen times in a year: prosecutions impeachments for wilful
bad judgment, as I have said already, never.

The It can do no harm therefore to give this
power: it would do some harm to with-hold it. To
determine that there has been an injury, and that
a wilful one done by a man in high office, and
at the same time refuse redress would be a melancholy
decision and an useless shock to the feelings of
mankind. Injury


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/051/209/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

209

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16374

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in