★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
your offices of doing better than your Courts.</p> | your offices of doing better than your Courts.</p> | ||
<p>I see how the case has been — Men have invented<lb/> | |||
imagined new expedients in Procedure, and<lb/> | |||
finding them not match with the expedients <add>system</add> of Procedure<lb/> | |||
in use before Courts of Justice, have gone<lb/> | |||
on imagining new systems to put the expedients into<lb/> | |||
and as a sort of natural consequence new Courts<lb/> | |||
to act with the benefit of these new systems. All<lb/> | |||
this is natural: but all this is crude: it is a step | |||
<unclear>latern</unclear> in the search of a good plan: but it is not<lb/> | |||
itself a good plan. This new expedient whatever<lb/> | |||
it be is it well adapted to promote the ends of<lb/> | |||
Justice? I take it up, and I put it into my system<lb/> | |||
of Procedure before Courts of Justice. I don't want <add>build</add> <add>Accommodation-Offices</add></p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
---page break---
49
Tit. II. B. & C.
of Procedure would be perfect if I could make it so,
but perfection is not the lot of human works. The
imperfection of your system of Procedure before your
Courts of Justice will afford no advantage to the institution
of your Accommodation-Offices unless the system
of Procedure before them is better than that before
the Courts. But why should it be? If you know
how to give a good better system than you have
given to your Courts why refuse it them and give
it to your offices. If you do not, what chance have
your offices of doing better than your Courts.
I see how the case has been — Men have invented
imagined new expedients in Procedure, and
finding them not match with the expedients system of Procedure
in use before Courts of Justice, have gone
on imagining new systems to put the expedients into
and as a sort of natural consequence new Courts
to act with the benefit of these new systems. All
this is natural: but all this is crude: it is a step
latern in the search of a good plan: but it is not
itself a good plan. This new expedient whatever
it be is it well adapted to promote the ends of
Justice? I take it up, and I put it into my system
of Procedure before Courts of Justice. I don't want build Accommodation-Offices
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/051/219/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
219 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f49 / f50 |
||
jeremy bentham |
l munn |
||
benjamin constant |
|||
16384 |
|||