JB/051/283/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/283/003: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:




24-Sept-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
<head>Tit VII. B</head><!-- in pencil -->
<head>District Court of Appeal</head>


<head>not <unclear>B</unclear><!-- 'B' ? --> </head><!-- note and heading in pencil -->


<head><note>Tit VII . B</note></head><!-- in pencil -->
<head>not <gap/><!-- 'B' ? -->  <note>District Court of Appeal</note></head><!-- note and heading in pencil -->
<p><!-- indented -->The natural object of such a forfeiture is to pay
<p><!-- indented -->The natural object of such a forfeiture is to pay
<lb/>
<lb/>
for the <del>trouble</del> <add>time</add> <del>created</del> <del>to</del> <add><del><gap/></del> <gap/> at</add> the Court above , the
for the <del>trouble</del> <add>time</add> <del>created</del> <del>to</del> <add><del>give</del> <gap/> at</add> the Court above, the
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>Department or</add> Metropolitan Court .  But if <del><gap/></del> it <del>had him</del> were
<add>Department or</add> Metropolitan Court.  But if <del><gap/></del> it <del>had him</del> were
 
<lb/>
 
given to that Court <del>it might appear as if they</del> <add>they would <del>stand chargeable in appearance</del> <add>be obnoxious to the imputation</add></add>
<lb/>
<del>had interest in exacting the forfeiture and refusing</del> <add><del><gap/></del> if <del>ha</del> profiting by their own injustice, when</add>
<lb/>
they exa<del>t</del>cted the forfeiture and refused their
<lb/>
certificate.  If their emoluments were fixed <del>they</del> <add><sic>their</sic></add>
<lb/>
<del>would in fact</del> gain, would in fact be nothing: but
<lb/>
detraction <del>does</del> <add>would</add> not stop to observe the difference.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Tit VII. B District Court of Appeal

not B

The natural object of such a forfeiture is to pay
for the trouble time created to give at the Court above, the
Department or Metropolitan Court. But if it had him were
given to that Court it might appear as if they they would stand chargeable in appearance <add>be obnoxious to the imputation</add>
had interest in exacting the forfeiture and refusing if ha profiting by their own injustice, when
they exatcted the forfeiture and refused their
certificate. If their emoluments were fixed they their
would in fact gain, would in fact be nothing: but
detraction does would not stop to observe the difference.



Identifier: | JB/051/283/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

283

Info in main headings field

judic. estab.

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16448

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in