★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/051/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- NB: please note the first two partial folios have been deleted diagonally (either in ink and pencil or in pencil). Delete tags have therefore been added. Amend as necessary. --> | |||
<p><note>Appeal III. Remedia</note> | |||
<lb/><!-- note in pencil --> and improved all concurr in manifesting the | |||
<lb/> | |||
importance of uniformity. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil --> | |||
<p><!-- indented --><note>Note addition</note> | |||
<lb/> | |||
The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision,</add> though naturally | |||
<lb/> | |||
connected with that of rectitude of decision | |||
<lb/> | |||
is perfectly distinct from it. Conceive | |||
<lb/> | |||
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of <add>law</add> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- I'm apt to think that the horizontal line in this case is simply there for the purposes of deletion of the paragraph. Add a separate comment tag, or amend this one if it's required to be denoted as a 'horizontal line' --> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre --> | |||
<p><note>Appeal III. Remedia.</note> | |||
<lb/><!-- in pencil --> <del>the remedy they would propose.</del> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- horizontal line --> | |||
<p><!-- indented --><note>English practice Reports of decisions in Statute</note><!-- note in pencil --> <lb/> | |||
In England no sooner does a clause in a | |||
<lb/> | |||
Statute become the subject of decision, than the <del>public</del> <add><del>science</del></add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add>is <add><del>is loaded</del></add> <del>gratified</del></add> <del>are cursed</del> <add>science is loaded</add> with a history of the arguments at | |||
<lb/> | |||
large in <add>ten or</add> twenty <del>or thirty</del> folio pages which are either | |||
<lb/> | |||
useless or of which the alteration of a single word in | |||
<lb/> | |||
the Statute would have superseded the use. And thus | |||
<lb/> | |||
the Statute — law instead of staying, serves only to | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>its</del> <sic>encrease</sic>, the plague of Common Law. Yet even | |||
<lb/> | |||
this plague is a blessing in comparison of a set of unpublished decisions convertible into <add>at the pleasure of any bookseller or of any note-holder</add> <!-- foreign text checked: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ex-post-facto&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a --><foreign><sic>ex-post-facto</sic><!-- no hyphens! --></foreign> laws. | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>at the pleasure of any note-taker who happens</del> <add><del>finds motives</del></add> <del>to produce | |||
<lb/> | |||
them out of his <gap/></del> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<head><note><del>Ch E<gap/></del></note> Addition to <del>n</del>Note (g) to § 3. being the last note</head> | |||
<p><!-- indented -->Private interests would likewise interfere <del>with the decision | |||
<lb/> | |||
on in the business</del> <add>with the decision,</add> and shake the probity, or what would | |||
<lb/> | |||
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to | |||
<lb/> | |||
give it | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Appeal III. Remedia
and improved all concurr in manifesting the
importance of uniformity.
Note addition
The consideration of uniformity of decision, though naturally
connected with that of rectitude of decision
is perfectly distinct from it. Conceive
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of law
---page break---
Note
Appeal III. Remedia.
the remedy they would propose.
English practice Reports of decisions in Statute
In England no sooner does a clause in a
Statute become the subject of decision, than the public science
is <add>is loaded gratified</add> are cursed science is loaded with a history of the arguments at
large in ten or twenty or thirty folio pages which are either
useless or of which the alteration of a single word in
the Statute would have superseded the use. And thus
the Statute — law instead of staying, serves only to
its encrease, the plague of Common Law. Yet even
this plague is a blessing in comparison of a set of unpublished decisions convertible into at the pleasure of any bookseller or of any note-holder ex-post-facto laws.
at the pleasure of any note-taker who happens finds motives to produce
them out of his
---page break---
Ch E Addition to nNote (g) to § 3. being the last note
Private interests would likewise interfere with the decision
on in the business with the decision, and shake the probity, or what would
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
give it
Identifier: | JB/051/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
5 |
|||
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
286 |
|||
001 |
note |
||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
16451 |
|||