JB/051/297/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/297/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/297/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/297/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->14 Obs.</head>
 
<p><note><!-- in pencil -->Secret</note> this sovereign tribunal can <add>never</add> be professed or entertained<lb/>
without the reserve more or less explicit<lb/>
of an appeal to the same tribunal when better<lb/>
informed.</p>
 
<p>In the cases in which the judgments of the<lb/>
public for want of that instruction which<lb/>
Time and Nature are now not backward in<lb/>
disseminating remain still chargeable with<lb/>
<del>contra</del> self-contradiction and inconsistency<lb/>
and self-contradiction <del>th</del> an appeal of this<lb/>
sort is not only justifiable but inevitable:<lb/>
since the same man can not possibly embrace<lb/>
both together of two contradictory propositions<lb/>
knowing them for what they are: and a man<lb/>
without any impeachment of the supremacy of<lb/>
that tribunal before which he pleads may say<lb/>
though it is against me today I am not in<lb/>
the wrong: for if <del>its</del> it is against me on<lb/>
one point it is for me on another: and it<lb/>
wants nothing but time to weigh the force of<lb/>
such reasons as I have to present to it, in<lb/>
order to reconcile itself with itself and come<lb/>
over altogether to my side.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

14 Obs.

Secret this sovereign tribunal can never be professed or entertained
without the reserve more or less explicit
of an appeal to the same tribunal when better
informed.

In the cases in which the judgments of the
public for want of that instruction which
Time and Nature are now not backward in
disseminating remain still chargeable with
contra self-contradiction and inconsistency
and self-contradiction th an appeal of this
sort is not only justifiable but inevitable:
since the same man can not possibly embrace
both together of two contradictory propositions
knowing them for what they are: and a man
without any impeachment of the supremacy of
that tribunal before which he pleads may say
though it is against me today I am not in
the wrong: for if its it is against me on
one point it is for me on another: and it
wants nothing but time to weigh the force of
such reasons as I have to present to it, in
order to reconcile itself with itself and come
over altogether to my side.




Identifier: | JB/051/297/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

297

Info in main headings field

obs.

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16462

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in