JB/051/376/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

3 Of Courts

11

A class of persons may be distrusted without offence
In the part of the Executive Magistrate, advisors
of the person who is to fill an office must is unavoidably
liable to give offence: on the part of the Legislator
a distrust of the office, that is of persons unassignable,
can never give any assignable person
any just cause of offence. Suspect an individual,
and you give offence: suspect a class and you
give none

12 Number.

A single judge where sufficient
Qu. for what interlocutory processes may a
single judge suffice?

13 Chambres assemblies

Judges from neighbouring districts
Qu. are there any cases in which
it might be expedient to involve Judges from the
neighbouring districts? This can only happen
in case of the uncertainty or intricacy of the
proof.

14 Qualifications

Judges to rise by gradation
Judges not to be promoted to a
superior superordinate district till they have served a certain
number of years in a subordinate one.

15 Qualifications

Judges to be made from Advocates or Assessors
A man not to be appointed a Judge of the
first (viz court/order) till he has served a
certain number of years as Advocate or Assessor
Qu. in what court whether in an equal or a
superior Court?

Identifier: \| JB/051/376/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	1-19
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	376	Info in main headings field	judicial estab of courts
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f1 / f2 / f3 / f4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16541
Box Contents

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 <head>11</head>
-<p>Tis the part of the Executive Magistrate, <unclear>advisors</unclear> <note>A <unclear>class</unclear> of persons may be <unclear>disrupted</unclear> without offence. </note>
+<p><note>A class of persons may be distrusted without offence</note>
 <lb/>
- of the person who is to fill an office <gap/> is unavoida-
+In the part of the Executive Magistrate, <unclear>advisors</unclear>
 <lb/>
--bly liable to give offence on the part of the Legisla-
+of the person who is to fill an office <del>must</del> is unavoidably
 <lb/>
--tor, a <unclear>distrust</unclear> of the office, that is of persons <unclear>in-
+liable to give offence: on the part of the Legislator
 <lb/>
--estimable</unclear>, can never give any <unclear>inequable person</unclear>
+a distrust of the office, that is of persons unassignable,
 <lb/>
-any just cause of offence. <unclear>Suspect</unclear> an individual,
+can never give any assignable person
 <lb/>
-and you give offence: <unclear>suspect</unclear> a <unclear>class</unclear> and you
+any just cause of offence. Suspect an individual,
 <lb/>
-give <unclear>none</unclear></p>
+and you give offence: suspect a class and you
+<lb/>
+give none</p>
 <head>12</head>
 <head>Number.</head>
-<p>For what <gap/> processes may a <note>A single judge where sufficient</note>
+<p><note>A single judge where sufficient</note>
+<lb/>
+Qu. for what interlocutory processes may a
 <lb/>
 single judge suffice?
@@ Line 32: / Line 36: @@
 <head>13</head>
 <head><sic>Chambres</sic> assemblies</head>
-<p><unclear>Ln.</unclear> are there any cases in which <note>Judges from <sic>neighbouring</sic> districts</note>
+<p><note>Judges from <sic>neighbouring</sic> districts</note>
 <lb/>
-it might be <sic>expediant</sic> to <unclear>consult</unclear> Judges from the
+Qu. are there any cases in which
 <lb/>
-<sic>neighbouring</sic> Districts? This can only happen
+it might be expedient to <unclear>involve</unclear> Judges from the
 <lb/>
-in case of the uncertainty or <unclear>inconstancy</unclear> of the
+neighbouring districts? This can only happen
+<lb/>
+in case of the uncertainty or intricacy of the
 <lb/>
 proof.</p>
@@ Line 45: / Line 51: @@
 <head>Qualifications</head>
-<p>Judges not to be promoted to a <note>Judges to rise by gradation</note>
+<p><note>Judges to rise by gradation</note>
 <lb/>
-superior <add><sic>subordniate</sic></add> district till they have served a certain
+Judges not to be promoted to a
 <lb/>
-number of years in a <sic>subordniate</sic> one.</p>
+superior <add>superordinate</add> district till they have served a certain
+<lb/>
+number of years in a subordinate one.</p>
 <head>15</head>
 <head>Qualifications</head>
-<p>A man not to be appointed a Judge of the <note><sic>Judgis</sic> to be made from Advocates or Assessors</note>
+<p><note>Judges to be made from Advocates or Assessors</note>
+<lb/>
+A man not to be appointed a Judge of the
 <lb/>
-<gap/> court/order <gap/> till he has served a
+first (viz court/order) till he has served a
 <lb/>
 certain number of years as Advocate or Assessor
 <lb/>
-<unclear>Ln.</unclear> in what court whether in an equal or a
+Qu. in what court whether in an equal or a
 <lb/>
 superior Court?</p>
@@ Line 66: / Line 76: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/051/376/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search