JB/057/009/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/009/004: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>C.P<lb/> [Publicity]</head> <!-- in pencil --><p>Courts why open <note>4</note></p> <p><sic>controul</sic> <del>these</del> the rest, apply to them.  Shut it<lb/> out, there is no power to <sic>controul</sic> them upon<lb/> earth.  Shut it out <del>ref</del> imperfectly, you have<lb/> a tribunal more or less tyrannical and corrupt,<lb/> according to the degree of secrecy.  shut it out
<note>4</note> <head>C.P<lb/>[Publicity]</head> <!-- in pencil --><p>Courts why open </p> <p><sic>controul</sic> <del>these</del> the rest, apply to them.  Shut it<lb/> out, there is no power to <sic>controul</sic> them upon<lb/> earth.  Shut it out <del>perf</del> imperfectly, you have<lb/> a tribunal more or less tyrannical and corrupt,<lb/> according to the degree of secrecy.  Shut it out perfectly,<lb/> you have an Inquisition or a  <unclear>Vehmire</unclear><lb/> council.  Would you have Justice corrupt, shut<lb/> up your Courts; would you have it spotless,<lb/> open them: and open <add>that</add> them as wide as possible.<lb/> That prevarication is scarce ever so much as imputed<lb/> to English Judges is well known: it is<lb/> because the eye of a scrutinising public is <del>of</del> <lb/> upon them.  It is this together with a very few<lb/> other features, which in spite of a thousand<lb/> <del>other</del> <add> deformities</add> <del>mark of <add>some such <gap/> as</add> deformity</del>, makes the face of<lb/> English Jurisprudence still amiable in the<lb/>public eye.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:57, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

4 C.P
[Publicity]

Courts why open

controul these the rest, apply to them. Shut it
out, there is no power to controul them upon
earth. Shut it out perf imperfectly, you have
a tribunal more or less tyrannical and corrupt,
according to the degree of secrecy. Shut it out perfectly,
you have an Inquisition or a Vehmire
council. Would you have Justice corrupt, shut
up your Courts; would you have it spotless,
open them: and open that them as wide as possible.
That prevarication is scarce ever so much as imputed
to English Judges is well known: it is
because the eye of a scrutinising public is of
upon them. It is this together with a very few
other features, which in spite of a thousand
other deformities mark of some such as deformity, makes the face of
English Jurisprudence still amiable in the
public eye.




Identifier: | JB/057/009/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

009

Info in main headings field

c p

Image

004

Titles

[[titles::[publicity] / courts why open]]

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

g1 / g2 / g3 / g4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18339

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in