JB/057/165/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/165/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 22<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <!-- in pencil --> Intermediate proceedings</note><lb/>(2 <note>§. Epistolary probation<lb/> when employable</note></p> <p><note>14<lb/>Cause of insufficiency<lb/> adverseness maximised</note></p> <p><del>Against the use of this mode the</del> On the part of the result<lb/> of this mode of collection one cause of insufficiency is altogether obvious &#x2014;<lb/> to wit the certainty that in relation to the pursuers <lb/> wishes and to the interest of justice where his demand is well-grounded,<lb/> adverseness will in this instance <add>case</add> be maximised.</p> <p><note>15<lb/> But in this case trustworthiness<lb/> is maximised</note></p>  <p>But if notwithstanding the adverseness <add>the <unclear>power</unclear> of the obstacle/temptation to <gap/></add> the temptation is <unclear>overturned</unclear><lb/> and the evidence sufficiently favourable to the pursuers demand<lb/> the verity of the evidence is more <del><gap/></del> unquestionable as<lb/>well as manifest in this case <add> coming from this party</add> than it could possibly<lb/> be if coming from the most trustworthy <add>extraneous</add> witness</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Even under existing<lb/> system trustworthiness<Lb/> of self <del>accusing</del> <add>adverse</add> testimony<lb/><sic> recognized</sic></note></p> <p>Even under the current system the <add>superior</add> trustworthiness<lb/> of <gap/> testimony <add>in this case</add> when employed against the testifier is universally<lb/> <sic>recognized</sic>, although according to those systems when<lb/> once collected in this mode it can not generally <gap/> be<lb/> extracted from the same individual in relation to the same part<lb/> in the oral mode.  But under the here proposed system it<lb/> is allowed in all cases: and being so allowed how prodigious <add>vast</add><lb/> the <gap/> thus made to the security for veracity and<lb/> verity is altogether manifest.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany 22
Procedure Code

Ch. Intermediate proceedings
(2 §. Epistolary probation
when employable

14
Cause of insufficiency
adverseness maximised

Against the use of this mode the On the part of the result
of this mode of collection one cause of insufficiency is altogether obvious —
to wit the certainty that in relation to the pursuers
wishes and to the interest of justice where his demand is well-grounded,
adverseness will in this instance case be maximised.

15
But in this case trustworthiness
is maximised

But if notwithstanding the adverseness the power of the obstacle/temptation to the temptation is overturned
and the evidence sufficiently favourable to the pursuers demand
the verity of the evidence is more unquestionable as
well as manifest in this case coming from this party than it could possibly
be if coming from the most trustworthy extraneous witness

16
Even under existing
system trustworthiness
of self accusing adverse testimony
recognized

Even under the current system the superior trustworthiness
of testimony in this case when employed against the testifier is universally
recognized, although according to those systems when
once collected in this mode it can not generally be
extracted from the same individual in relation to the same part
in the oral mode. But under the here proposed system it
is allowed in all cases: and being so allowed how prodigious vast
the thus made to the security for veracity and
verity is altogether manifest.




Identifier: | JB/057/165/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-01-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

14-16

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

165

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18495

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in