★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 22<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <!-- in pencil --> IX Intermediate proceedings</note><lb/>(3 <note>§. Epistolary probation<lb/> when employable.</note></p> <p><note>17<lb/>If | <head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 22<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <!-- in pencil --> IX Intermediate proceedings</note><lb/>(3 <note>§. Epistolary probation<lb/> when employable.</note></p> <p><note>17<lb/>If Defendants answer<lb/> insufficient ulterior<lb/> interrogation where<lb/> employable</note></p> <p>If in the <sic>judgment</sic> of the Judge the Defendant's response <add>answer</add><lb/>is not sufficient to grant the demand, and at the same time<lb/>in the <sic>judgment</sic> of the Judge, on <add>after</add> hearing the <del><gap/></del> pursuer, not<lb/>so correct and <sic>compleat</sic> as by ulterior interrogatories <add>observation communicated,</add> it might<lb/>be ready, and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> in such first as to furnish a sufficient<lb/>ground for the demand, in such case a second <del>instrum</del> interrogative<lb/>instrument approved by the Judge may be transmitted<lb/>to the Defendant: and so to his question, the one thing as often<lb/> as the other until <del>the</del> confessional evidence <del>the adequate to</del> <add> sufficient</add><lb/> for the establishment of the demand be regarded as being either<lb/><add>actually</add> obtained or hopeless</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. Jany 22
Procedure Code
Ch. IX Intermediate proceedings
(3 §. Epistolary probation
when employable.
17
If Defendants answer
insufficient ulterior
interrogation where
employable
If in the judgment of the Judge the Defendant's response answer
is not sufficient to grant the demand, and at the same time
in the judgment of the Judge, on after hearing the pursuer, not
so correct and compleat as by ulterior interrogatories observation communicated, it might
be ready, and that in such first as to furnish a sufficient
ground for the demand, in such case a second instrum interrogative
instrument approved by the Judge may be transmitted
to the Defendant: and so to his question, the one thing as often
as the other until the confessional evidence the adequate to sufficient
for the establishment of the demand be regarded as being either
actually obtained or hopeless
|
Identifier: | JB/057/166/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-01-22 |
17 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
166 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
18496 |
|||
