★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. March 20.<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <!-- note in pencil apart from Ch and § --><p>13<lb/> <note><sic>Ch</sic> IX </note><lb/> (13 <note>§. 10 Testimony how procurable<lb/> 12 Epistolary better than<lb/> oral elicitation — Exceptions</note></p> <p><add><sic>Art.</sic> Of the Case in which the <del>< | <head>1825. March 20.<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <!-- note in pencil apart from Ch and § --><p>13<lb/> <note><sic>Ch</sic> IX </note><lb/> (13 <note>§. 10 Testimony how procurable<lb/> 12 Epistolary better than<lb/> oral elicitation — Exceptions</note></p> <p><add><sic>Art.</sic> Of the Case in which the <del><sic>preferability</sic></del> <sic>preferableness</sic> of the</add><lb/><del><sic>Art</sic> Example may have place in any<lb/> <gap/> testimony in the <gap/> or</del> the epistolary mode to the Testimony <add>the testimony being delivered</add> <lb/><del><gap/> as <gap/> of the case following.</del><lb/> requiring Judicatory <del> in character <gap/> <gap/> </del> to the oral mode the testimony<lb/>being <del><gap/></del> <add>elicited</add> at a distant Judicatory is most apt to have place, examples are<lb/> the following</p> <p><note>9<lb/> Cases for <sic>preferableness</sic><lb/> of epistolary over<lb/> oral testimony<lb/> 1 fact solitary<lb/> 2 fact simple</note></p> <p>1. The fact, in relation to which the proposed witnesses<lb/> testimony is needed, a fact standing by itself, unconnected<lb/>in respect of evidence with the main subject of the enquiry.</p> <p>2. The fact at the same time a simple one: such<lb/>for instance as the fact of authenticity or non-authenticity <add>spuriousness</add><lb/> the fact of <del>t</del> a man having written or not written<lb/>adopted or not adopted a deed, or letters, or other<lb/>writing, to which, for the purpose of its being requested as<lb/> having been his, a name purporting to be his name is <add>stands</add><lb/> subjoined. <add> attached.</add></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. March 20.
Procedure Code
13
Ch IX
(13 §. 10 Testimony how procurable
12 Epistolary better than
oral elicitation — Exceptions
Art. Of the Case in which the preferability preferableness of the
Art Example may have place in any
testimony in the or the epistolary mode to the Testimony the testimony being delivered
as of the case following.
requiring Judicatory in character to the oral mode the testimony
being elicited at a distant Judicatory is most apt to have place, examples are
the following
9
Cases for preferableness
of epistolary over
oral testimony
1 fact solitary
2 fact simple
1. The fact, in relation to which the proposed witnesses
testimony is needed, a fact standing by itself, unconnected
in respect of evidence with the main subject of the enquiry.
2. The fact at the same time a simple one: such
for instance as the fact of authenticity or non-authenticity spuriousness
the fact of t a man having written or not written
adopted or not adopted a deed, or letters, or other
writing, to which, for the purpose of its being requested as
having been his, a name purporting to be his name is stands
subjoined. attached.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-03-20 |
9 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
217 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d13 / e13 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18547 |
|||
