JB/057/254/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/254/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. March 20<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>3<lb/> <note><Sic>Ch.</sic> Prospects as to Reform</note><lb/>3 <note>&sect;. 1</note></p> <p> Opponents: 1.  Patrons, 2 Aspirants to patronage<lb/>3. Legal anti-reformists<lb/>4. Political anti reformists</p> <!-- pencil U shaped dividing mark before text to its right --> <p>4. <!-- 3 overwritten --> <sic>Preventers</sic> of the <lb/>present reform,<lb/> resident reformists<lb/> like the Whigs</p> <p>Lawyer could no more wish for perfect <hi rend="underline">health</hi><lb/>than Physicians for <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> <hi rend="underline">Justice</hi></p> <p>So much for the <add>eventual</add> <unclear>gainers</unclear> and thence the expectation<lb/>prevention of the <sic><unclear>pretent</unclear></sic> reform in question.</p> <p>From these however may have to be deducted those<lb/> whose attachment to the abuse have its rise <del>rather</del> in a greater<lb/>degree from <add>in</add> contempt begotten prejudice, authority begotten prejudice,<lb/> is indigenous witness, answer all then in <add>the</add> sincere<lb/>interest: and as to what proportion these may have to<lb/> those whose conduct will be <add>exclusively</add> determined by a <add>clear comprehensive and</add> just estimate<lb/> of the effects with relation to those interests till<lb/> there will be matter of accident, depending on the circumstance<lb/>of the time.</p> <p> The opponents may be <gap/> and counted<lb/>with much greater certainty and precision.  They may<lb/>be classed a mans following.</p> <p>1. All <del>these</del> persons having a share in the patronage<lb/>of the <sic>prefered</sic> to be suppressed Offices.</p>  
<head>1825. March 20<lb/>
Procedure Code</head>  
<!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>3<lb/>
<note><Sic>Ch.</sic> Prospects as to Reform</note><lb/>
3 <note>&sect;. 1</note></p>


<p> Opponents: 1. Patrons, 2 Aspirants to patronage<lb/>
3. Legal anti-reformists<lb/>
4. Political anti reformists</p>
<!-- pencil U shaped dividing mark before text to its right --> <p>4. <!-- 3 overwritten --> <sic>Preventers</sic> of the <lb/>
present reform,<lb/>
resident reformists<lb/>
like the Whigs</p>


<p>Lawyer could no more wish for perfect <hi rend="underline">health</hi><lb/>
than Physicians for <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> <hi rend="underline">Justice</hi></p>
<p>So much for the <add>eventual</add> gainers and thence the expectation<lb/>
prevention of the partial reform in question.</p>
<p>From these however may have to be deducted those<lb/>
whose attachment to the abuse have its rise <del>rather</del> in a greater<lb/>
degree from <add>in</add> interest begotten prejudice, authority begotten prejudice,<lb/>
or indigenous weakness, answer all then in <add>the</add> sincere<lb/>
interest: and as to what proportion these may have to<lb/>
those whose conduct will be <add>exclusively</add> determined by a <add>clear comprehensive and</add> just estimate<lb/>
of the effects with relation to those interests till<lb/>
there will be matter of accident, depending on the circumstance<lb/>
of the time.</p>
<p>The opponents may be <unclear>unambiguated</unclear> and counted<lb/>
with much greater certainty and precision. They may<lb/>
be classed in manner following.</p>
<p>1. All <del>these</del> persons having a share in the patronage<lb/>
of the proposed to be suppressed Offices.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 20
Procedure Code

3
Ch. Prospects as to Reform
3 §. 1

Opponents: 1. Patrons, 2 Aspirants to patronage
3. Legal anti-reformists
4. Political anti reformists

4. Preventers of the
present reform,
resident reformists
like the Whigs

Lawyer could no more wish for perfect health
than Physicians for do Justice

So much for the eventual gainers and thence the expectation
prevention of the partial reform in question.

From these however may have to be deducted those
whose attachment to the abuse have its rise rather in a greater
degree from in interest begotten prejudice, authority begotten prejudice,
or indigenous weakness, answer all then in the sincere
interest: and as to what proportion these may have to
those whose conduct will be exclusively determined by a clear comprehensive and just estimate
of the effects with relation to those interests till
there will be matter of accident, depending on the circumstance
of the time.

The opponents may be unambiguated and counted
with much greater certainty and precision. They may
be classed in manner following.

1. All these persons having a share in the patronage
of the proposed to be suppressed Offices.



Identifier: | JB/057/254/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

254

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18584

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in