JB/070/023/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/070/023/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


<p>at the pleasure, and as it were by the creation of the<lb/>
<p>at the pleasure, and as it were by the creation of the<lb/>
professor; <note>v. I. Locke but an obscure anticipation of those <add>fundamental <gap/></add> truths whereof his metaphysical System smoothed the way to the discovery It was reserved to Helvetius to place them in a full &amp; steady light and perhaps to some one yet to come to put it <foreign>hors d'attiente</foreign> by separating the <del><gap/></del> of that great man from at once questionable and <add>unpopular</add> revoltants by introducing a little more method into the plan, and by <del>multiplying</del> <add>extending</add> the number &amp; particularity of [examples] amplifications to [<add>put it out of the reach</add> satisfy the .... of all objectors] to dissipate every remaining cloud that remains <add>offers itself to the observation</add> exposed to the .... of objectors to reconcile it with opposing prejudices</note></p>
professor;<lb/> <note>v. I. Locke but an obscure anticipation of those <add>fundamental moral</add> truths whereof his metaphysical System smoothed the way to the discovery It was reserved to Helvetius to place them in a full &amp; steady light and perhaps to some one yet to come to put it <foreign>hors d'attiente</foreign> by separating the <del><gap/></del> of that great man from at once questionable and <add>unpopular</add> revoltants by introducing a little more method into the plan, and by <del>multiplying</del> <add>extending</add> the number &amp; particularity of [examples] amplifications to [<add>put it out of the reach</add> satisfy the .... of all objectors] to dissipate every remaining cloud that remains <add>offers itself to the observation</add> exposed to the .... of objectors to reconcile it with opposing prejudices</note></p>


<p>If we ask<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> then<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi>, whether the science be <add>susceptible</add> capable of<lb/>
<p>If we ask<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> then<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi>, whether the science be <add>susceptible</add> capable of<lb/>
Line 11: Line 11:
facts <add>in each case</add> are susceptible <del><add>in</add></del> of, and none other.</p>
facts <add>in each case</add> are susceptible <del><add>in</add></del> of, and none other.</p>


<p>I [would] scorn <add>blush tremble</add> to take an undue credit<lb/>
<p>I [would] scorn <add>blush <add>tremble</add></add> to take an undue credit<lb/>
to my system by omitting to point out any weakness<lb/>
to my system by omitting to point out any weakness<lb/>
in it I can discover.</p>
in it I can discover.</p>


[Desirous of nothing more than that my system<lb/>
<p>[Desirous of nothing more than that my system<lb/>
should not prevail if it be not true, nor <add>if it be</add> any<lb/>
should not prevail if it be not true, nor <add>if it be</add> any<lb/>
farther than it is <add>so</add> true. I would seem &amp;c at  
farther than it is <add>so</add> true. I would seem &amp;c at <gap/>]</p>


<p>It is founded upon sensation &#x2014; that is certain &#x2014;<lb/>
&amp; <del>it</del> sensation is the highest evidence &#x2014; that is also<lb/>
certain</p>
<p>but this sensation is not of him who announces the<lb/>
proposition concerning it [whether of affirmance or<lb/>
denial] it is not of the Professor, nor can it be<lb/>
(but by accident) of the audience: it is in him<lb/>
and in them no more than a presumption of<lb/>
what would be the sensations if other men, <add>in a case which is not present</add> formed<lb/>
upon recollection observation &amp; analogy &#x2014; recollection<lb/>
of past experiences <add>one's own sensations</add> upon past occasions &#x2014; observation<lb/>
of the conduct of other's <del>men</del> &#x2014; analogy according to<lb/>
which such conduct <add>or discourse</add> is presumed to originate from</p>
<pb/>
<p><!-- top right quadrant --> <add>the like</add> sensations as <add>those which</add> give birth to the same conduct in ourselves.<lb/> <note>it is not so with they must be caught as they arise.</note></p>
<p>It is true again on the other hand that this recollection<lb/>
<add>of experience</add> this observation &amp; this analogy are the <add>very</add> grounds <del>which</del><lb/>
and the only one we have) of conduct which are universally<lb/>
received as sufficient for the most<lb/>
as well as least important concerns of common life. <note>I should hold myself accountable for all the mischief it <sic>produc'd</sic> to suffer my system to gain <add>the chance</add> an undue credit by <add>the non-op</add> <del>not <gap/> diss</del> enabling <del>of <gap/></del> of any weakness I can <add>see</add> discover</note></p>
<p><add>These observations</add> This <del>expe</del> recollection of experience may be erroneous &#x2014;<lb/>
it may be incomplete, <sic>tho'</sic> just: the analogy<lb/>
<add>binding <del><gap/></del> together the experiences and observations, according to</add> <del>by</del> which the sensations of others are presumed<lb/>
to be what we think we remember<lb/>
our own to have been in situations <add>cases</add> similar,<lb/>
<sic>tho</sic> <add>true</add> just in kind <add>as to this kind of those sensations</add> may be erroneous as to their<lb/>
degree<lb/> <note>Thus much does it want &amp; thus much it is presumed &amp; much more must every other want <del>Thus much does it</del> want of the evidence of intuition. This is <sic>it's</sic> weakness but it is for those who maintain a different one to <sic>shew</sic> that it is a weakness from whom their own is free <del>is a case which is not present</del></note></p>
<pb/>
<p><!-- lower left quadrant --> <note>Helvetius )( Beccaria</note><lb/> Helvetius established the principle of utility as the universal<lb/>
list <add>the merit of</add> of all actions <add>as well them which are</add> whether the object of law or <add>as</add> any others:<lb/>
Becarria first set <add>it out</add> [the maxim formed upon this principle]<lb/>
at the head of a work of jurisprudence.</p>
<p>It is clear therefore then when Locke proposed<lb/>
to himself the question whether moral truths <note>viz, truths concerning the merit of moral actions</note><lb/>
<add>of the number of</add> <del>of which</del> <add>what are called</add> political are only a part) are <add>strictly</add> susceptible<lb/>
of demonstration, and <sic>answer'd</sic> it in the affirmative,<lb/>
he had no clear notion of the principle<lb/>
of utility as the standard of the merit of those<lb/>
actions.</p>
<head>NOTE</head>
<p>The maxim he has <sic>alledged</sic> as an example, viz:<lb/>
that "where there is no property, there is no injustice",<lb/>
is <add>at bottom</add> nothing more than a proposition concerning<lb/>
the import of the words <sic>employ'd</sic> <add>in it</add> [resolvable<lb/>
into an identical one] what it declares is,<lb/>
that the term injustice is not in the <del>his</del> opinion<lb/>
of the speaker to be applied <add>predicated</add> to any act by which<lb/>
no property is violated: but how to know what<lb/>
is injustice in itself, and how it comes to have an<lb/>
evil influence upon <add>the <sic>ballance</sic> of</add> happiness are questions<lb/>
the solution of which it contributes but little to advance.</p>
<pb/>
<p><!-- lower right quadrant --> <note>Moral Sense &#x2014; different</note><lb/> Fallacy in attributing the word Sense to the<lb/>
pretended <hi rend='underline'>Moral Sense</hi>: this sense is not that<lb/>
of those persons who are affected by the act:<lb/>
That sense is rather <add>a taste; i:e:</add> an instructive and lucky<lb/>
judgment than a sense [than an element of which<lb/>
happiness and misery are composed] and as<lb/>
<add>[different]</add> much distinguishable from these sensations, <add>whether of mind or body</add> the<lb/>
Elements of which happiness and misery are<lb/>
composed, as the aversion felt at seeing a bad<lb/>
action done in common life or represented upon<lb/>
a theatre is from the unhappiness the sensation<lb/>
of pain felt by the persons who are the objects of<lb/>
it.</p>
<p>Demonstration is performed <add>a perpetual</add> by judgments of the<lb/>
agreement or disagreement of ideas, wherein the<lb/>
mind is not passive but active</p>
<head>INTROD. Utility rests on Fact &#x2014; Expectation a fact. How far <hi rend='underline'>certain</hi> [BR][II][ ] Locke "Moral Sense" not a <hi rend='underline'>Sense</hi>.</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:03, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

INTROD.

at the pleasure, and as it were by the creation of the
professor;
v. I. Locke but an obscure anticipation of those fundamental moral truths whereof his metaphysical System smoothed the way to the discovery It was reserved to Helvetius to place them in a full & steady light and perhaps to some one yet to come to put it hors d'attiente by separating the of that great man from at once questionable and unpopular revoltants by introducing a little more method into the plan, and by multiplying extending the number & particularity of [examples] amplifications to [put it out of the reach satisfy the .... of all objectors] to dissipate every remaining cloud that remains offers itself to the observation exposed to the .... of objectors to reconcile it with opposing prejudices

If we ask2 then1, whether the science be susceptible capable of
certainty, the answer is plain, the same that those
facts in each case are susceptible in of, and none other.

I [would] scorn blush <add>tremble</add> to take an undue credit
to my system by omitting to point out any weakness
in it I can discover.

[Desirous of nothing more than that my system
should not prevail if it be not true, nor if it be any
farther than it is so true. I would seem &c at ]

It is founded upon sensation — that is certain —
& it sensation is the highest evidence — that is also
certain

but this sensation is not of him who announces the
proposition concerning it [whether of affirmance or
denial] it is not of the Professor, nor can it be
(but by accident) of the audience: it is in him
and in them no more than a presumption of
what would be the sensations if other men, in a case which is not present formed
upon recollection observation & analogy — recollection
of past experiences one's own sensations upon past occasions — observation
of the conduct of other's men — analogy according to
which such conduct or discourse is presumed to originate from


---page break---

the like sensations as those which give birth to the same conduct in ourselves.
it is not so with they must be caught as they arise.

It is true again on the other hand that this recollection
of experience this observation & this analogy are the very grounds which
and the only one we have) of conduct which are universally
received as sufficient for the most
as well as least important concerns of common life. I should hold myself accountable for all the mischief it produc'd to suffer my system to gain the chance an undue credit by the non-op not diss enabling of of any weakness I can see discover

These observations This expe recollection of experience may be erroneous —
it may be incomplete, tho' just: the analogy
binding together the experiences and observations, according to by which the sensations of others are presumed
to be what we think we remember
our own to have been in situations cases similar,
tho true just in kind as to this kind of those sensations may be erroneous as to their
degree
Thus much does it want & thus much it is presumed & much more must every other want Thus much does it want of the evidence of intuition. This is it's weakness but it is for those who maintain a different one to shew that it is a weakness from whom their own is free is a case which is not present


---page break---

Helvetius )( Beccaria
Helvetius established the principle of utility as the universal
list the merit of of all actions as well them which are whether the object of law or as any others:
Becarria first set it out [the maxim formed upon this principle]
at the head of a work of jurisprudence.

It is clear therefore then when Locke proposed
to himself the question whether moral truths viz, truths concerning the merit of moral actions
of the number of of which what are called political are only a part) are strictly susceptible
of demonstration, and answer'd it in the affirmative,
he had no clear notion of the principle
of utility as the standard of the merit of those
actions.

NOTE

The maxim he has alledged as an example, viz:
that "where there is no property, there is no injustice",
is at bottom nothing more than a proposition concerning
the import of the words employ'd in it [resolvable
into an identical one] what it declares is,
that the term injustice is not in the his opinion
of the speaker to be applied predicated to any act by which
no property is violated: but how to know what
is injustice in itself, and how it comes to have an
evil influence upon the ballance of happiness are questions
the solution of which it contributes but little to advance.


---page break---

Moral Sense — different
Fallacy in attributing the word Sense to the
pretended Moral Sense: this sense is not that
of those persons who are affected by the act:
That sense is rather a taste; i:e: an instructive and lucky
judgment than a sense [than an element of which
happiness and misery are composed] and as
[different] much distinguishable from these sensations, whether of mind or body the
Elements of which happiness and misery are
composed, as the aversion felt at seeing a bad
action done in common life or represented upon
a theatre is from the unhappiness the sensation
of pain felt by the persons who are the objects of
it.

Demonstration is performed a perpetual by judgments of the
agreement or disagreement of ideas, wherein the
mind is not passive but active

INTROD. Utility rests on Fact — Expectation a fact. How far certain [BR][II][ ] Locke "Moral Sense" not a Sense.



Identifier: | JB/070/023/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

023

Info in main headings field

introd. utility rests on fact - expectation a fact - how far certain locke "moral sense" not a sense

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23138

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in