JB/070/062/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/070/062/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>VOLUMINOUSNESS</head>
<head>VOLUMINOUSNESS</head>
<p>It is by the wanton and deplorable <gap/> of Paper <add><unclear>comments</unclear></add> made by <del>all</del> Legislation, much <add>more</add> <unclear>to</unclear><lb/>
<p>It is by the wanton and deplorable waste of Paper <add>committed</add> made by <del>all</del> Legislation, much <add>more</add> so<lb/>
than from the <del>nature of the work</del> <add>the very nature of the subject</add> itself, that a Digest <add>of any</add> of the Law <del><gap/></del> <add>is found to be</add><lb/>
<add>volu</add>minous a work:&#x2014; What need for instance <add>in a work <add>too</add> which professes to be a compound</add> to prove be <add><unclear>only</unclear> of</add> Homer with <lb/>
Justinian that the Swine <add>Pig</add> is a gregarious animal by a passage <add>from Homer</add> which <del>does</del><lb/>
<del>prove it</del> after all? <add>proves no such thing</add> as if that absolute Emperor <del>had it not <add>otherwise</add>in his power</del> <add>Willing</add> to establish<lb/>
the <add>doctrine</add> proposition which he inferred from <sic>it's</sic> so being, had it not otherwise in his power</p>  


<unclear>than</unclear> from the <del><gap/> of the <gap/></del> <add><unclear>stormy</unclear> nature of the subject</add> itself<unclear>,</unclear> that a Digest <add>of say</add> of the Law <del><gap/></del> <add>informed to <gap/></add><lb/>
<note> ... Now it was no more than the fashion<lb/>
for Hog-drivers to read Homer <lb/>
in Rome <add>than</unclear></add> but this were indeed in <lb/>
Constantinople than it is now and <unclear>England</unclear><lb/>
<p>I make instance of this truth,<lb/>
as being celebrated for its conciseness,<lb/>
to <unclear>shew</unclear> how much further<lb/>
that property might be carried<lb/>
if all superfluities were to <lb/>
be [rigorously] lopped off.</note>


<add>volu</add>minous a work<unclear>:</unclear> What and for instance <add>in a work <gap/> which <unclear>probably</unclear> to by a <unclear>compend</unclear></add> to prove <unclear><gap/></unclear> <add><unclear>only</unclear> of</add> Homer with <lb/>  
<p>What need for the preposterous modesty of the word "<unclear>indeter</unclear>" <unclear>recurring</unclear> in every <add>page</add><lb/>
<add>a mode of language</add> as inconsistent to <add>with</add> that precision which is the <add>most indispensable of the formal qualities</add> first quality <add>property <add><gap/> <unclear>month</unclear></add></add> of a Law or <unclear>worth thing</unclear><lb/> majority of the Sovereign power: which betrays from under <add>Imperial marble</add> the name of the Sovereignty<lb/>
the dispensations &amp; indeterminate</unclear> <add><del>irresolute</del></add>  <del><gap/></del><add>diffidence</add> of the <add>compositor</add> commentator, like the <unclear>chemothestic</unclear> <add>features</add> of the ignobler animal <del>pushing <add>projecting</add> through</del> <add> <del><gap/></del> <sic>ill-cover'd</sic> by </add> the Lion's <gap/>.</p>


gregarious <gap/> by a <unclear>passage</unclear> <add>from Homer</add> which <del><unclear>is</unclear></del><lb/>
<p>More than half <add>perhaps</add> that work short <add>small</add> as it is will be found to be taken up by the <lb/> frivolous disputations spun out <add>sometimes</add> to the length of <add>1/2</add> a page to have understand after all <add>what</add> <del><gap/></del> <lb/> <add>the</add> two words would have determined either way with equal utility.<add>||</add></p>  


<del>prove of</del> after all <add>proves no such thing</add> as if that <gap/> <gap/> <del><gap/><add><gap/></add>in his <gap/></del> <add><unclear>willing</unclear></add> to establish<lb/>
<note>|| Note<lb/>
This practice seems to have proceeded <add>had its</add><lb/>origin in good measure, from the notion <add>law is more conformable</add> <lb/>that no alteration must on exclusion <lb/><add>of the other</add> conformity to the confused Idea of<lb/> Natural Justice, whose dictates therefore <lb/> it was the business to find out<lb/> whereas by far the greater share of<lb/> ability accrued not from the <del>produ</del> but from the establishment of either.</note>


the <add><gap/></add><unclear>proposition</unclear> which he <unclear>inferred</unclear> from <unclear>its to bring,</unclear> had it not otherwise in his power <unclear>.</unclear><lb/></p>  
<p>For of disputation <del>there</del> <add>is</add> <lb/> <del>and neither is</del> <add>nor is any thing</add> easier than for one man standing in the station of a pleader to <lb/> employ a volume upon a question, which another invested with due authority shall decide <add>with perfect <gap/></add><lb/> <add>one or two</add> <del>two or three times</del>.</p>


<note>  
<note>And to this,<del> if I may be permitted</del>
... Now it was no <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>
<lb/> to mention <add>the mask</add> <del><gap/></del> a little sort of its place <lb/> is among the monstrous voluminousness<lb/> of our <hi rend='underline'>Common Law</hi>; which consists of comparatively but a few axiomatical <lb/> propositions</unclear>, floating in an <unclear>immense Sea of controversy.</note>
<gap/> for <gap/>-<unclear>driven</unclear> to read Homer <lb/>
<p>I insist not upon the Legislative <sic>stile</sic> of <add>the</add> <unclear>effects</unclear> of a more modern and equally <lb/>
in  <gap/> <add><unclear>start</unclear></add> but than ever <gap/> in <lb/>
race, who<add> not content to "disdain" without they who "statute &amp; command"</add> are <del><gap/></del> made to talk in a language which <del><gap/></del> often describes as much <add>from</add><lb/>
<unclear>Constantinople</unclear> than it is now and <unclear>England</unclear><lb/>
<gap/> him <note> <unclear>concordant</unclear> lines of {<add>simplicity</add> proponents}<lb/>
<p>I make <gap/> of <unclear>this fourh,</unclear><lb/>
as being <gap/> for <unclear>this concire-</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>nets</unclear>, to How how much <unclear>further</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>that property</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>to carried</unclear><lb/>
if all <unclear>improperucity</unclear> were to <lb/>
be [rigorously] lopped off.</p>
</note>
</note>
 
of his Majesty <note>  
 
from Majesty<lb/>  
 
What need for the <unclear>preposterous moderty</unclear> of this word "<unclear>indeter</unclear>" <unclear>recurring</unclear> in every <add>page</add> <lb/>
 
<add>a mode of language</add> as inconsistent to <add>with</add> that precision which is the <add>mark <unclear>indiscriminate</unclear> of the formal <unclear>quality</unclear></add> <unclear>first</unclear> quality <add>property <add><gap/> <unclear>month</unclear></add></add> of a Law or <unclear>worth thing</unclear><lb/> majority of the foreign power: which <unclear>belongs</unclear> from under the name of the <unclear>Lowery</unclear> <lb/>
 
<unclear>the</unclear> <unclear>dispensations of indeterminate</unclear> <add> <del><gap/></del> </add>  <del><gap/></del><add><gap/></add> of the <add><unclear>compitor</unclear></add> commentator, like the <unclear>chemothestic</unclear> <add>features</add> of the <gap/> <unclear>dominal</unclear> <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add> <del><gap/></del> ill-<sic>cover'd</sic> by </add> the Lion's <gap/>.<lb/>
 
More than half <add><gap/></add> <unclear>that</unclear> work <unclear>immutable</unclear> as it is will be found to be take up by the <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <unclear>disfrutation</unclear> <unclear>upon</unclear> <add><gap/></add> out to the length of <add>1/2</add> a <unclear>frago</unclear> to hear <unclear>indetermined</unclear> after all <add>what</add> <del><gap/></del> <lb/> <unclear>two</unclear> words <sic>wantd</sic> have determined <unclear>either cray</unclear> with equal utility.
 
<note><head>II Note</head> This practice <unclear>seems</unclear> to have<add> had its </add> <gap/><lb/><gap/> in <unclear>good manner</unclear> from the <unclear>notion</unclear><add><unclear>law is more confirmation</unclear></add> <lb/>that no alteration must an exclusion <lb/><add><gap/><gap/><add><gap/></add></add> conformity to the confused Idea of no end:<lb/> Natural Justice, where dictates <unclear>than</unclear> <lb/><add>fore</add> it was the <gap/> to find out<lb/> wheras by <sic><unclear>farr</unclear></sic> the <unclear>greater than</unclear> of<lb/> ability accend not from the <del>pardon</del><add><gap/></add>  <lb/><del><gap/></del> of our in <gap/>, but him<lb/> the establisment of <gap/></note>
 
Fear of diputation <del>were</del><add>is</add> <lb/> <del>and <unclear>neither</unclear> is</del> <add>nor is any thing.</add> <unclear>easier</unclear> than for one man standing in the station of a<unclear>pleader</unclear> to <lb/> employ a <gap/> when a question, whcih another <unclear>endocrted</unclear> with <unclear>for</unclear> authority shall decide <add>with perfect <gap/></add><lb/><del><gap/> or <gap/> him</del> <add> <unclear>or one or him</unclear></add> <lb/>
 
<note>
And to <unclear>this</unclear>,<del> of <gap/> many for <gap/></del>
<lb/> to mention <add>a <gap/> <gap/></add> <del><gap/></del>  a <gap/> out of its place <lb/> is <gap/> the <gap/> <unclear>underestimations</unclear><lb/> of our <hi rend='underline'>Common Law</hi>; which consists of <gap/> but a few <unclear>axioms</unclear> <lb/>  <unclear> trial propositions</unclear>, floating in an <unclear>immense Law of controrering</unclear>.</note>
 
<gap/> not upon the Legislation <gap/> of <add>the</add> <unclear>effects</unclear> of a more modern and equally <lb/>
pace, who not content to "disdain" without they who " <unclear>Hatuto</unclear> of command" are <del><gap/></del> made to talk in a language which <del><gap/></del> often <unclear> a counts</unclear> as much <add>from</add><lb/>
<gap/> him <note> <unclear>corrdardent</unclear> lines of {<add><unclear>simplicity</unclear></add> proponents}<lb/>
</note>
 
of <unclear>his</unclear> Majesty  
<note>  
<head> <gap/>from Magesty </head> <lb/>  
whom utility would either way have <lb/>
whom utility would either way have <lb/>
followed the decision<lb/>
followed the decision<lb/>
<unclear>when</unclear> a decision <unclear>ishan pusmanent of</unclear> <lb/>
when a decision when permanent &amp;<lb/>
<unclear>pronolified</unclear> will either way be followed <lb/>
praenotified will either way be followed <lb/>
by Justice <sic>+</sic> by Utility.
by Justice &amp; by Utility</note>
</note>
by a loquacious <add>rampant / <gap/></add> haughtiness <add><gap/></add> as that of the Roman <add>Emperor</add> <gap/><lb/>
 
by a creeping Irresolution.<lb/>
by a loquacious <add><unclear>pampant</unclear><add><gap/></add></add> Laughting <add><gap/></add> as that of the Roman <add><sic>Emporor</sic></add> <gap/><lb/>
by a <unclear>cruping vorrecolution</unclear> <lb/>


<p><unclear>There</unclear> examples will <add>suffice</add><lb/>
<p><unclear>There</unclear> examples will <add>suffice</add><lb/>
Line 75: Line 59:
<gap/> from eligance <gap/> <unclear>precision</unclear></note>
<gap/> from eligance <gap/> <unclear>precision</unclear></note>


<head>COM<unclear>P</unclear>OS Statsingly as a discourse. General Idea <gap/> [ ] <gap/>. <unclear>Battologia</unclear> <unclear>fastuosa</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>hoesitatomae Justinian</unclear> <add>Louis</add> <gap/>
<p>COMPOS Stat singly as a discourse. General Idea Bk. [ ] <gap/>. <unclear>Battologia</unclear> <unclear>fastuosa</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>hoesitatomae Justinian</unclear> <add>Louis</add> <gap/>
</head>
</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:03, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

VOLUMINOUSNESS

It is by the wanton and deplorable waste of Paper committed made by all Legislation, much more so
than from the nature of the work the very nature of the subject itself, that a Digest of any of the Law is found to be
voluminous a work:— What need for instance in a work <add>too which professes to be a compound</add> to prove be only of Homer with
Justinian that the Swine Pig is a gregarious animal by a passage from Homer which does
prove it after all? proves no such thing as if that absolute Emperor had it not otherwisein his power Willing to establish
the doctrine proposition which he inferred from it's so being, had it not otherwise in his power

... Now it was no more than the fashion
for Hog-drivers to read Homer
in Rome than</unclear> but this were indeed in
Constantinople than it is now and England

I make instance of this truth,
as being celebrated for its conciseness,
to shew how much further
that property might be carried
if all superfluities were to
be [rigorously] lopped off.

What need for the preposterous modesty of the word "indeter" recurring in every page
a mode of language as inconsistent to with that precision which is the most indispensable of the formal qualities first quality property <add> month</add> of a Law or worth thing
majority of the Sovereign power: which betrays from under Imperial marble the name of the Sovereignty
the dispensations & indeterminate</unclear> irresolute diffidence of the compositor commentator, like the chemothestic features of the ignobler animal pushing projecting through ill-cover'd by the Lion's .

More than half perhaps that work short small as it is will be found to be taken up by the
frivolous disputations spun out sometimes to the length of 1/2 a page to have understand after all what
the two words would have determined either way with equal utility.||

|| Note
This practice seems to have proceeded had its
origin in good measure, from the notion law is more conformable
that no alteration must on exclusion
of the other conformity to the confused Idea of
Natural Justice, whose dictates therefore
it was the business to find out
whereas by far the greater share of
ability accrued not from the produ but from the establishment of either.

For of disputation there is
and neither is nor is any thing easier than for one man standing in the station of a pleader to
employ a volume upon a question, which another invested with due authority shall decide with perfect
one or two two or three times.

And to this, if I may be permitted
to mention the mask a little sort of its place
is among the monstrous voluminousness
of our Common Law; which consists of comparatively but a few axiomatical
propositions</unclear>, floating in an <unclear>immense Sea of controversy.

I insist not upon the Legislative stile of the effects of a more modern and equally
race, who not content to "disdain" without they who "statute & command" are made to talk in a language which often describes as much from
him concordant lines of {simplicity proponents}
of his Majesty from Majesty
whom utility would either way have
followed the decision
when a decision when permanent &
praenotified will either way be followed
by Justice & by Utility
by a loquacious rampant / haughtiness as that of the Roman Emperor
by a creeping Irresolution.

There examples will suffice
to illustrate the aphorism That "The Laws should command J not ad argue dispute" of the

Bacon who to all the majesty of genius and examplified in that invaluable
collectiopn of Jurisprudence maxims Aphorisms of which
there is one
, adds more of the precision of Ju
intermuted judgement exporance than his age could reasonalby have hoped to see, and is more truely
perhaps than the Grecian Critic of whom it was first applied " himself the image an example of the great sotlaine he
draws."

So distant from true dignity,
from eligance precision

COMPOS Stat singly as a discourse. General Idea Bk. [ ] . Battologia fastuosa hoesitatomae Justinian Louis



Identifier: | JB/070/062/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

062

Info in main headings field

voluminousness compos. stat. singly as a discourse general idea

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23177

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in