JB/070/159/001: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Latest revision as of 10:03, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

TABULATION. Hermes 2

— seated in a Table

(xx xx
(
{
(
( Attributions
and these
are

( 1. Verbs
(
{ 2.d Participles
(
(
( 3d Adjectives

( xxxx&c
(
{
(x xx &c

( &c
(
{
(
( &c

( &c

{
( &c

Here we have an example of that articulation form of Tabulation
+ + compaction — which from hence forward I will take leave to
form call the Unarticulated.
To it give it then articulation, I select from the Book some one or
more of the most remarkable essential characteristic differences
circumstances noted in the manufacation and I proceed
in this manner

Hermes 3

Attributions are divisible into such as contain
an Assertion coupled with the Attributes, &
such others as do not — Such as do are
known by the name of Verbs: such as do
not, by that the names either of Participles
or of Adjectives.

Verbs again denote (along with their assertion)
denote as well Quantities and Qualities or Motions
with their privation [+] [+] Adjectives denote
only Quantities &
Qualities Participles denote
only Motions and their privation —

Put All Now this we may put represent Table-wise thus:

Identifier: \| JB/070/159/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	070	Main Headings	of laws in general
Folio number	159	Info in main headings field	tabulation hermes
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / c3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23274
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 <!-- this page is organised in two columns -->
-<head>TABULATION.  Hermes <hi rend="superscript">2</hi></head> <p> &#x2014; seated in a Table</p><!-- this table is a series of linked brackets.   the relationship is described by each bracketed set --> <p> ( XXXX<lb/> (<lb/> { <lb/> (<lb/> ( Attributions<lb/> (and these<lb/> (are</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Attributions --> <p> ( 1. Verbs<lb ( <lb/> ( <lb/> { 2.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Participles <lb/> ( <lb/> ( <lb/> ( 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Adjectives <lb/> (</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Verbs --> <p>( xxxx&amp;c <lb/> ( <lb/> { <lb/> (x xx &amp;c <lb/> ( </p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Participles --> <p>( &amp;c <lb/> (<lb/> {<lb/> ( <lb/> ( &amp;c<lb/> (</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Adjectives --> ( &amp;c <lb/> <lb/> { <lb/> ( &amp;c <lb/> (</p> <!-- end of Table --> <p> Here we have an example of that <del>articulation</del> <add> Form of Table</add><lb/> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi>  <note> + compaction</note> form &#x2014;<add> which from hence forward I will take leave to</add><lb/> call the  Unarticulated.<lb/>  To <del><gap/> it</del> <add> give it then</add> <hi rend="underline">articulation</hi>, I select <add. from the Book</add> some <add> one or</add> <lb/> more of the most remarkable essential differences<lb/> <add> circumstances</add> <del>noted</del> in the <sic>manufaction</sic> and I proceed<lb/> in this manner</p>  <!-- right hand column --> <p> attributions are divisible into such as contain<lb/>< an Assertion coupled with the Attributes, &amp;<lb/>such others as do not &#x2014; such as do are<lb/> known by the name of verbs: such as do<lb/> no, by <del>that</del> the names either of Participles<lb/> or <add>of Adjectives.</p> <p> Verbs again <del> denote</del> (along with their assertion)<lb/> <add>denote</add> as well Quantities and Qualities &#x2014; motions<lb/> with their <hi rend="underline">privation</hi> <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> Adjectives denote<lb/> only Quantities &amp;<lb/> Qualities</note> Participles <del>denote</del> <lb/> only Motions and their <hi rend="underline">privation</hi> &#x2014;</p> <p> <del>All</del> <add> Now</add> this we may <del>put</del> represent<lb/> Table-wise thus:</p>
+<head>TABULATION.  Hermes <hi rend="superscript">2</hi></head> <p> &#x2014; seated in a Table</p><!-- this table is a series of linked brackets.   the relationship is described by each bracketed set --> <p> (xx xx<lb/> (<lb/> { <lb/> (<lb/> ( Attributions<lb/> and these<lb/> are</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Attributions --> <p> ( 1. Verbs<lb ( <lb/> ( <lb/> { 2.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Participles <lb/> ( <lb/> ( <lb/> ( 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Adjectives</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Verbs --> <p>( xxxx&amp;c <lb/> ( <lb/> { <lb/> (x xx &amp;c  </p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Participles --> <p>( &amp;c <lb/> (<lb/> {<lb/> ( <lb/> ( &amp;c</p> <!-- bracketed set centred to the right of the word Adjectives --><p> ( &amp;c <lb/> <lb/> { <lb/> ( &amp;c</p> <!-- end of Table --> <p> Here we have an example of that <del>articulation</del> <add> form of Tabulation</add><lb/> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi>  <note> + compaction</note> &#x2014;<add> which from hence forward I will take leave to</add><lb/><del>form</del> call the  Unarticulated.<lb/>  To <del><gap/> it</del> <add> give it then</add> <hi rend="underline">articulation</hi>, I select <add> from the Book</add> some <add> one or</add> <lb/> more of the most remarkable essential <add> characteristic</add> differences<lb/> <add> circumstances</add> <del>noted</del> in the <sic>manufacation</sic> and I proceed<lb/> in this manner</p>  <!-- right hand column --> <p>Hermes <hi rend="superscript">3</hi></p> <p>Attributions are divisible into such as contain<lb/> an Assertion coupled with the Attributes, &amp;<lb/>such others as do not &#x2014; Such as do are<lb/> known by the name of Verbs: such as do<lb/> not, by <del>that</del> the names either of Participles<lb/> or <add>of Adjectives.</add></p> <p> Verbs again <del> denote</del> (along with their assertion)<lb/> <add>denote</add> as well Quantities and Qualities or Motions<lb/> with their <hi rend="underline">privation</hi> <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> Adjectives denote<lb/> only Quantities &amp;<lb/> Qualities</note> Participles <del>denote</del> <lb/> only <hi rend="underline">Motions</hi> and their <hi rend="underline">privation</hi> &#x2014;</p> <p><del>Put</del> <add> <del>All</del> Now this we may <del>put</del> represent</add> Table-wise thus:</p>
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/070/159/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:03, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search