JB/070/229/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/229/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head><del><gap/></del> Servants. Carriers. Artisans.</head>
<head><del><gap/></del> Servants. Carriers. Artisans.</head>
<head>EMBEZZLEMENT</head>
<head>EMBEZZLEMENT</head>
<p>He is ordinarily forth-coming <add>It is unnecessary <gap/></add> <note>The <unclear>boundary</unclear> of no sort of Authority were at that time defined by those limitations which experience & more accurate <del><unclear>examination</unclear></del><add><gap/></add> reflection has <unclear>gradually</unclear> suggested.</note>
 
&amp; responsible:+ <note>+ you have given judgement in favor of his sufficiency by the very circumstances of refusing the trust in him:</note> there was always a time when he had a lawful <del>possess</del><add>title</add><lb/>
<p><note>The boundaries of no sort of Authority were at that time defined by those limitations which experience &amp; more accurate <del>examination</del> <add><gap/></add> reflection has gradually suggested.</note>
to the possession of your property: it is <add>may be</add> difficult <add>It is dangerous, however</add> to determine <add>in many cases</add> whither the <del><unclear>uses</unclear></del> he has put it <add>to which he has</add><lb/>
<lb/>
<add><unclear>Quoted</unclear> it</add>to are contrary<add>repugnant<add>inconsistent with</add> to the [nature of] the interest in it which you communicated to him;<lb/>  
He is ordinarily forth-coming <add>It is unnecessary <gap/></add>  
[supposing that done], it may be<add>again</add> difficult to ascertain at what <unclear>precise</unclear> period the diversion<lb/>
&amp; responsible:<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> you have given judgement in favor of his sufficiency by the very circumstance of refusing the trust in him:</note>  
commenced: at any rate he was of your own choosing, &amp; <add>loss you have any way by his means is unkind <gap/></add> consequence of your want <add>own neglect</add> of <unclear>preparation</unclear>:<lb/>
there was always a time when he had a lawful <del>posses</del> <add>title</add>
<lb/>
to the possession of your property: it is <add>may be</add> difficult <add>It is dangerous, however</add> to determine <add>in many cases</add> whether the <del>trust</del> he has put it <add>to which he has</add>
<lb/>
<add>debated it</add> to are contrary <add>repugnant <add>inconsistent with</add></add> to the [nature of] the interest in it which you communicated to him;<lb/>  
[supposing that done], it may be<add>again</add> difficult to ascertain at what precise period the diversion
<lb/>
commenced: at any rate he was of your own choosing, &amp; the <add>loss you have any way by his means is unkind <gap/></add> consequence of your want <add>own neglect</add> of <unclear>preparation</unclear>:
<lb/>
the incident affords no equal inference of danger to those who are better on their<lb/>
the incident affords no equal inference of danger to those who are better on their<lb/>
guard. <note>The spirit of social intercourse would be damped & men would be reluctant to form connections of business & friendship, if <del>the track</del> danger was made <add>brought</add> to <unclear>border</unclear> so closely upon the track in which <add>these connections must</add> they [would] <add>these connections must</add> engage them. </note></p>
guard.  
<p>circumstance all<add>of</add> which are apt to <sic>concurr</sic> in what may be deemed a breach of trust, &amp; which<lb/>
<lb/>
conspire in establishing a difference<add>[in <gap/> of <unclear>mischief</unclear>]</add> between that &amp; those acts of <add>flagrant &</add> promiscuous spoliation, <add>depradation</add> <unclear>at</unclear><lb/>
<note>The spirit of social intercourse would be damped &amp; men would be reluctant to form connections of business &amp; friendship, if <del>the track</del> <add>danger</add> was made <add>brought</add> to border so closely upon the track in which <add>these connections</add> they <add>these connections</add> [would]<add>must</add> <add>must</add> engage them. </note></p>
 
 
<p>circumstance all<add>of</add> which are apt to <sic>concurr</sic> in what may be deemed a breach of trust, &amp; which
<lb/>
conspire in establishing a difference <add>[in point of <unclear>mischief</unclear>]</add> between that &amp; those acts of <add>flagrant &amp;</add> promiscuous spoliation, <add>depradation</add> <unclear>at</unclear><lb/>
are what <sic>occurr</sic> to the mind on the hearing of the word "Theft", [&amp; consequently in point of expediency<lb/>
are what <sic>occurr</sic> to the mind on the hearing of the word "Theft", [&amp; consequently in point of expediency<lb/>
of punishment]</p>  
of punishment]</p>  
<p>It was probably some confused perception of these differences that influenced the distinctions of<lb/>
 
<note>All these objections are obviated by the power given to the Jury of determining whether there was a <hi rend='underline'><unclear>pertinence</unclear></hi> of Title. - This would be as good a Rule to govern every particular case as every particular case would <add>could</add> be for another </note> <add>they <unclear>sucevent</unclear></add>Lawyers or this Law:<add>[but they are not altered <add>for most part</add> <add>and the Law is <unclear>contrary</unclear> -re 3? Inst.</add> tho' we must not expect to see them brought forth into view, and <unclear>intited</unclear><lb/>
<p>It was probably some confused perception of these differences that influenced the distinctions of
on by persons unaccustomed<add>ie little accustomed</add> to assume any thing that belongs <add>[mostly]</add> to the <unclear>defendant</unclear> of <gap/><lb/>
<lb/>
for the <unclear>proposed</unclear><add><unclear>arrived upon</unclear></add> measures <add>[in the means of doing <add>an <unclear></unclear></add> to]</add> of their [<unclear>opinions</unclear>] decisions.  [unless it be the great <add><unclear>outstanding</unclear></add> and <unclear>distinguish</unclear><lb/>
<note>All these objections are obviated by the power given to the Jury of determining whether there was a <hi rend='underline'>pertinence</hi> of Title. - This would be as good a Rule to govern every particular case as every particular case would <add>could</add> be for another </note>  
<lb/>
<add><unclear>these eminent</unclear></add> Lawyers or this Law:<add> [but they are not altered <add>for most part</add></add> <add>and the Law is <unclear>contrary</unclear> -re 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Inst.</add> tho' we must not expect to see them brought forth into view, and <gap/><lb/>
on by persons unaccustomed <add>ie little accustomed</add> to assume any thing that belongs <add>[mainly]</add> to the <gap/> of utility
<lb/>
 
<pb/>
 
for the professed <add><unclear>arrived upon</unclear></add> measures <add>[in the room of doing <add>an <unclear>belonged</unclear></add> to</add> of their [opinions] decisions.  [unless it be the great <add> <gap/></add> and <unclear>standinguish</unclear><lb/>
of adhering to former decisions which deservedly claims their attention in <unclear>preeminence</unclear> indeed but<lb/>
of adhering to former decisions which deservedly claims their attention in <unclear>preeminence</unclear> indeed but<lb/>
not in exclusion of every other.] <note>It became to be perceived <add>found</add> [or at least it might have been observed, that in Relation to  <gap/>outs men have not this choice <add>option</add>; they can not [in their choice <add>of objects of a <unclear>certain</unclear> kind of confidence</add> go out of that class of a more <del><gap/></del> is <add>more - exposed</add> comparative <unclear>indigence</unclear> exposes to the temptation to abuse it; characteristic marks of the <unclear>cautious</unclear><add>waryful</add> <unclear>conversive</unclear> 2 <add>become</add> are 3 gradually brought into view <add>by <gap/></add> & understood<add>recorded</add> <add>by aflicted </add> the altering of the form of the subject changing of it's usual place the <unclear>presentation</unclear> or <add>the</add> plight of the malefactor! Its if a servant make his Masters Sheets into Shirts for himself, or put a  <del><gap/><gap/></del><add><gap/></add> into his own Box among his own things or <unclear>being</unclear> asked after it denies the having it when he has concealed it, or when if he goes off with it.</note></p>
not in exclusion of every other.]  
<lb/>
<note>It became to be perceived <add>found</add> [or at least it might have been observed, that in Relation to  servants men have not their choice <add>option</add>; they can not [in their choice <add>of objects of a certain kind of confidence</add> go out of that class of men <del><unclear>which</unclear></del> is <add>are</add> - <del>exposed</del> comparative indigence exposes to the temptation to abuse it; characteristic marks of the <unclear>cautious</unclear> <add>wrongful</add> <unclear>conversive</unclear> <add>2</add> are <add>become</add> <add>3</add> gradually brought into view <add>by reflected</add> &amp; understood <add>recorded</add> <add>by aflicted </add>: the altering of the form of the subject changing of <sic>it's</sic> usual place the prevention or <add>the</add> plight of the malefactors!</note>
<lb/>
<note>As if a servant make his Masters Sheets into Shirts for himself, or put a  <del><gap/></del> <add>Spoon</add> <del>of</del> into his own Box among his own things or <unclear>being</unclear> asked after it denies the having it when he has concealed it, or when if he goes off with it.</note></p>
    
    


Line 29: Line 54:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Servants. Carriers. Artisans. EMBEZZLEMENT

The boundaries of no sort of Authority were at that time defined by those limitations which experience & more accurate examination reflection has gradually suggested.
He is ordinarily forth-coming It is unnecessary & responsible:+ + you have given judgement in favor of his sufficiency by the very circumstance of refusing the trust in him: there was always a time when he had a lawful posses title
to the possession of your property: it is may be difficult It is dangerous, however to determine in many cases whether the trust he has put it to which he has
debated it to are contrary repugnant <add>inconsistent with</add> to the [nature of] the interest in it which you communicated to him;
[supposing that done], it may beagain difficult to ascertain at what precise period the diversion
commenced: at any rate he was of your own choosing, & the loss you have any way by his means is unkind consequence of your want own neglect of preparation:
the incident affords no equal inference of danger to those who are better on their
guard.
The spirit of social intercourse would be damped & men would be reluctant to form connections of business & friendship, if the track danger was made brought to border so closely upon the track in which these connections they these connections [would]must must engage them.


circumstance allof which are apt to concurr in what may be deemed a breach of trust, & which
conspire in establishing a difference [in point of mischief] between that & those acts of flagrant & promiscuous spoliation, depradation at
are what occurr to the mind on the hearing of the word "Theft", [& consequently in point of expediency
of punishment]

It was probably some confused perception of these differences that influenced the distinctions of
All these objections are obviated by the power given to the Jury of determining whether there was a pertinence of Title. - This would be as good a Rule to govern every particular case as every particular case would could be for another
these eminent Lawyers or this Law: [but they are not altered <add>for most part</add> and the Law is contrary -re 3d Inst. tho' we must not expect to see them brought forth into view, and
on by persons unaccustomed ie little accustomed to assume any thing that belongs [mainly] to the of utility

---page break---
for the professed arrived upon measures [in the room of doing <add>an belonged to</add> of their [opinions] decisions. [unless it be the great and standinguish
of adhering to former decisions which deservedly claims their attention in preeminence indeed but
not in exclusion of every other.]
It became to be perceived found [or at least it might have been observed, that in Relation to servants men have not their choice option; they can not [in their choice of objects of a certain kind of confidence go out of that class of men which is are - exposed comparative indigence exposes to the temptation to abuse it; characteristic marks of the cautious wrongful conversive 2 are become 3 gradually brought into view by reflected & understood recorded by aflicted : the altering of the form of the subject changing of it's usual place the prevention or the plight of the malefactors!
As if a servant make his Masters Sheets into Shirts for himself, or put a Spoon of into his own Box among his own things or being asked after it denies the having it when he has concealed it, or when if he goes off with it.





Identifier: | JB/070/229/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

229

Info in main headings field

embezzlement servants carriers artisans

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23344

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in