JB/070/260/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/260/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>LARCENY &#x2014; Conies <hi rend="superscript">1</hi></head> <p> These are a genus of Animals, which <add>while</add> by reason of their smallness and wildness of their<lb/> temperament when born and a state of liberty are not susceptible of a numerical<lb/> appropriation by <add>from</add> person, are yet <add>naturally from the nature of their habitation</add> susceptible of a permanent numerical appropriation<lb/>from <add> &#x2014; the more of</add> place &#x2014; agreeing with Deer in that they are susceptible of a <add> permanent &amp;</add> numerical<lb/> appropriation, disagreeing with them, in that it is not on the score of personality;<lb/> agreeing with the rest of animals comprised under the popular denomination of<lb/> Game in that the property in them can only be on the score of place, &#x2014; differing<lb/> from them; in that it is permanent &#x2014; Accordingly in a place expressly<lb/> provided <add> or preserved</add> for their reception, <del> there</del> no one can fancy <add> suppose</add> himself to have a title to take<lb/> them unless at the same time he fancy himself to be owner of that place; we<lb/> may collect therefore <add> from what has been <sic>observ'd</sic> before on the Theory of appropriation</add> very sufficient reason to <del>consider</del> assent to the propriety of<lb/> putting them on the same footing of protection from depredations as any other<lb/> kind of property.</p> <p><note> this is nearly what the Law has done<lb/> And thus does the Law stand at<lb/> present.</note></p> <p> The first Statute relative to the Article is that of the 3.J.1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>.13. <add> concerning</add> of which <del> we <gap/> <add>an account</add></del> <lb/> <del>has already</del> we have already had observed how, <add> making </add> profession to cure a <add>supposed</add> defect of a pre<gap/>ing<lb/> Statute relative to Deer it forgot that profession in the same instant,<lb/>&amp; betakes itself to the including <add>placing</add> of this Article in the same predicament with<lb/> that other.</p>
<p><note> 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> J.1.13 &#x2014;<lb/> ACCESSARY Subsequent.<lb/> As the mark of their appropriation<lb/> is only local &amp; not personal<lb/> and as they subsist in places<lb/> where <add> to which</add> that appropriation does <lb/>not extend, [as they are very ordinarily<lb/> used for food], as, in this instance<lb/>taken in their state of liberty, they <lb/>are easily <unclear>nourished</unclear> in great <gap/><lb/> <unclear>to</unclear> a state of domestication, in <gap/> <lb/>as they are <unclear>numerous sheep</unclear> <add> different in this respect from Deer</add> &amp;<lb/> <gap/>, they cannot be commodiously<lb/> be made the subject<lb/> of the necessary offence, subsequent.</note></p>  <p><add> Even</add> Amidst the <add> all that</add> variety that <add> which the collective <gap/> </add>offer themselves, this Statute may even be chosen <lb/> for a pattern of oscitancy <add> &amp; attention</add>: <add>Not</add> All the [attention] <add> care</add> which the penner could prevail upon<lb/> himself to bestow could guard him from falling into the contradiction of destroying<lb/> in explicit terms <del>in the short space of two pages</del> what he had established<lb/> in <del>two</del> <add> the same</add> explicit terms &#x2014; <add> in the same Instrument</add> Particular care is taken in the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Section to specify<lb/> that the Act shall extend to the offences therein described <add> committed</add> whether "in the night time"<lb/> or by day". while care <add>yet more</add> as particular is taken <add> in a profusion of words</add> by the 8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> &amp; last, that it shall <add> not</add> extend<lb/> <del>not</del> to offences committed in the day, but in the night only. This latter section <add> Provision</add><lb/> is repeated by another <sic>Stat.</sic> of which notice has also been taken <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note> + 7.J.1.13</note> as far as relates<lb/> to Deer, but preserved in full force as to the Present article. <hi rend="superscript">||</hi></p> <p><note> <hi rend="superscript">||</hi> I know not how it <add>has</add> <sic>happen'd</sic><lb/> that neither of the two modern<lb/> compilers of the Statute have<lb/> taken notice of this Statute as<lb/>relating to the article &#x2014; they begin with the <sic>Stat.</sic> which I have mentioned next.</note></p> <p> THEFT Conies  [1]</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY — Conies 1

These are a genus of Animals, which while by reason of their smallness and wildness of their
temperament when born and a state of liberty are not susceptible of a numerical
appropriation by from person, are yet naturally from the nature of their habitation susceptible of a permanent numerical appropriation
from — the more of place — agreeing with Deer in that they are susceptible of a permanent & numerical
appropriation, disagreeing with them, in that it is not on the score of personality;
agreeing with the rest of animals comprised under the popular denomination of
Game in that the property in them can only be on the score of place, — differing
from them; in that it is permanent — Accordingly in a place expressly
provided or preserved for their reception, there no one can fancy suppose himself to have a title to take
them unless at the same time he fancy himself to be owner of that place; we
may collect therefore from what has been observ'd before on the Theory of appropriation very sufficient reason to consider assent to the propriety of
putting them on the same footing of protection from depredations as any other
kind of property.

this is nearly what the Law has done
And thus does the Law stand at
present.

The first Statute relative to the Article is that of the 3.J.1st.13. concerning of which we an account
has already we have already had observed how, making profession to cure a supposed defect of a preing
Statute relative to Deer it forgot that profession in the same instant,
& betakes itself to the including placing of this Article in the same predicament with
that other.

3d J.1.13 —
ACCESSARY Subsequent.
As the mark of their appropriation
is only local & not personal
and as they subsist in places
where to which that appropriation does
not extend, [as they are very ordinarily
used for food], as, in this instance
taken in their state of liberty, they
are easily nourished in great
to a state of domestication, in
as they are numerous sheep different in this respect from Deer &
, they cannot be commodiously
be made the subject
of the necessary offence, subsequent.

Even Amidst the all that variety that which the collective offer themselves, this Statute may even be chosen
for a pattern of oscitancy & attention: Not All the [attention] care which the penner could prevail upon
himself to bestow could guard him from falling into the contradiction of destroying
in explicit terms in the short space of two pages what he had established
in two the same explicit terms — in the same Instrument Particular care is taken in the 2d Section to specify
that the Act shall extend to the offences therein described committed whether "in the night time"
or by day". while care yet more as particular is taken in a profusion of words by the 8th & last, that it shall not extend
not to offences committed in the day, but in the night only. This latter section Provision
is repeated by another Stat. of which notice has also been taken + + 7.J.1.13 as far as relates
to Deer, but preserved in full force as to the Present article. ||

|| I know not how it has happen'd
that neither of the two modern
compilers of the Statute have
taken notice of this Statute as
relating to the article — they begin with the Stat. which I have mentioned next.

THEFT Conies [1]




Identifier: | JB/070/260/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

260

Info in main headings field

larceny - conies

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23375

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in