JB/070/280/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/070/280/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>OFFENCES <del>IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT</del> <add>INSOLVENCY.</add> </head> <p>The Imprisonment for Debt must <add>can</add> be <sic>consider'd</sic> <del>either</del> <add>only</add> as a means <add>either</add> of redress, or <add>of</add><lb/> prevention &#x2014; If the latter <add>considered in the latter view</add> there is a glaring incongruity in annexing a punishment<lb/> to this act <add>Insolvency</add> which is oftener <add>as often</add> not blameable than it is <add> as not blameable</add> [exceeding <add>equalling as much</add> <del>that</del> as it is <unclear>possible</unclear><lb/> for a punishment of the same kind to exceed] that <del>punishment</del> of the most heinous crimes <add>for</add><lb/> which imprisonment is the penalty <unclear>denounced</unclear>.</p> <p>[<sic>Consider'd</sic>] in the former, it is a just cause of censure <add>regret</add> that no method should be<lb/> taken <add>prescribed</add>, to prevent it's going beyond that purpose, that is being <sic>suffer'd</sic> in cases <add>where</add><lb/> that purpose can in no wise be attained</p> <p><note>These operations of the Law, which<lb/> so many have so pressing an Interest<lb/> to be <sic>apprized</sic> of, can no more be <lb/> <gap/> <add> nor made to <unclear>escape</unclear> their observation &amp; attention</add> than Burges's army will<lb/> lie incognito at Brentford.</note></p> <!-- in a bubble to the left of the margin but appears to be a continuation of the margin note --> <p><note>The interest of hope which<lb/> opens mens cages not of<lb/> fear which shuts them<lb/> nor prevented from being the<lb/> subject of their speculation,<lb/> and the foundation of<lb/> their conduct</note></p> <p>Towards the purpose of compelling compensation, <add>payment</add> the suffering <add>expedient</add><lb/> imprisonment contributes <add>operates</add> in two ways upon two different sorts of<lb/> people &#x2014; 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> upon the Debtor himself &#x2014; 2<hi rend="superscript">dly</hi> upon his friends<lb/> Now when it has operated upon him so far as to induce him to give <lb/> up his all to [get] free <add>himself</add> from it, it has operated upon him all that it can<lb/> so long therefore &amp; no longer <add>on this score</add> should it be continued.  But what <add>a Debt which</add> a man is unable to discharge<lb/> of himself he will often find friends to discharge for him: and such, <sic>tho'</sic> willing may <add>not</add><lb/> be able to give him the requisite assistance in a sort [&amp; limited] timenor willing, <sic>tho'</sic> <add>they</add> <lb/> <add>should</add> be able to <del>f</del> make an extraordinary effort and <unclear>pinch</unclear> themselves for the sake of <gap/><lb/> him from an <del>situation</del> mishap whose duration <add>of which</add> is <del>short and</del> <add>limited</add> &amp; short. &#x2014; In short, it is<lb/> very <add>plain</add> intelligible that the strength of their efforts to deliver <del><gap/></del> him from that situation, as<lb/> consequently the chance of the creditor <add>of being satisfied</add> depending upon those efforts will be great, in<lb/>proportion as that uneasiness of that situation <del>is the</del> <add> appears</add> great <del><gap/></del> <add> whether from its'</add> intensity it <gap/> <add> from its</add><lb/>Judges therefore should have power to set free on delivering up all, except they be <gap/><lb/> by suggestions of an opposing Creditor verified by Oath, that there is room to think <add>that</add><lb/> the Debtor has friends <del>h</del> who would do something for him rather than he should <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> any longer</p> <p>This <del>would</del> <add> operation</add> has committed to the Judge has nothing formidable and it, once the worse<lb/> that could happen from it to the prisoner would be the being <add>left</add> in that situation in which<lb/> he is plunged now without the <add>this</add> chance of extracting himself <add>being extracted</add>from it.</p> <p><note>On Execution for Damages given on<lb/> Torts, Analogy with the subsisting System<lb/> will still better justify the discharging<lb/>of a prisoner after a confinement of<lb/> limited duration: when the duration of<lb/> it is always limited when inflicted for<lb/>Torts of a much higher kind.</note></p> <p><note>INSOLVENCY</note> [BR][2]</p> 
 
<head>OFFENCES <add>INSOLVENCY</add> <del>IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT</del></head>
 
The Imprisonment for Debt must <add>can</add> be considered <del>either</del> <add>only</add> as a means <add>either</add> of <sic>redrese</sic>, or of prevention
<lb/>
 
 
 
<unclear>questionable reading</unclear> &#x2014; <add><sic>considird in this <unclear><unclear>questionable reading</unclear></unclear></sic></add> of the  


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

OFFENCES IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT INSOLVENCY.

The Imprisonment for Debt must can be consider'd either only as a means either of redress, or of
prevention — If the latter considered in the latter view there is a glaring incongruity in annexing a punishment
to this act Insolvency which is oftener as often not blameable than it is as not blameable [exceeding equalling as much that as it is possible
for a punishment of the same kind to exceed] that punishment of the most heinous crimes for
which imprisonment is the penalty denounced.

[Consider'd] in the former, it is a just cause of censure regret that no method should be
taken prescribed, to prevent it's going beyond that purpose, that is being suffer'd in cases where
that purpose can in no wise be attained

These operations of the Law, which
so many have so pressing an Interest
to be apprized of, can no more be
nor made to escape their observation & attention than Burges's army will
lie incognito at Brentford.

The interest of hope which
opens mens cages not of
fear which shuts them
nor prevented from being the
subject of their speculation,
and the foundation of
their conduct

Towards the purpose of compelling compensation, payment the suffering expedient
imprisonment contributes operates in two ways upon two different sorts of
people — 1st upon the Debtor himself — 2dly upon his friends
Now when it has operated upon him so far as to induce him to give
up his all to [get] free himself from it, it has operated upon him all that it can
so long therefore & no longer on this score should it be continued. But what a Debt which a man is unable to discharge
of himself he will often find friends to discharge for him: and such, tho' willing may not
be able to give him the requisite assistance in a sort [& limited] timenor willing, tho' they
should be able to f make an extraordinary effort and pinch themselves for the sake of
him from an situation mishap whose duration of which is short and limited & short. — In short, it is
very plain intelligible that the strength of their efforts to deliver him from that situation, as
consequently the chance of the creditor of being satisfied depending upon those efforts will be great, in
proportion as that uneasiness of that situation is the appears great whether from its' intensity it from its
Judges therefore should have power to set free on delivering up all, except they be
by suggestions of an opposing Creditor verified by Oath, that there is room to think that
the Debtor has friends h who would do something for him rather than he should
any longer

This would operation has committed to the Judge has nothing formidable and it, once the worse
that could happen from it to the prisoner would be the being left in that situation in which
he is plunged now without the this chance of extracting himself being extractedfrom it.

On Execution for Damages given on
Torts, Analogy with the subsisting System
will still better justify the discharging
of a prisoner after a confinement of
limited duration: when the duration of
it is always limited when inflicted for
Torts of a much higher kind.

INSOLVENCY [BR][2]



Identifier: | JB/070/280/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

280

Info in main headings field

offences insolvency

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23395

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in