★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/071/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1</head><!-- in pencil --> | |||
<head>C</head><!-- slightly right of centre --> | |||
<head>Of Extenuations — Reasons</head><!-- indented, and in pencil --> | |||
<head>Question I</head><!-- slightly left of centre --> | |||
<p>Why a total want of intention unaccompanied | |||
<lb/> | |||
by heedlessness is made a ground of extenuation: | |||
<lb/> | |||
insomuch as to exempt the <del>party</del> <add>Defendant</add> from | |||
<lb/> | |||
all punishment except what may be included | |||
<lb/> | |||
in compensation? | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>Reasons</head><!-- centred --> | |||
<p>1 Because any greater degree of punishment would | |||
<lb/> | |||
be <del>groundless</del> inefficacious. <del>You r</del> A person by | |||
<lb/> | |||
accident has hurt you: but by the supposition | |||
<lb/> | |||
he did not intend to hurt you: by the supposition | |||
<lb/> | |||
he was not <add>so much as</add> conscious of his being | |||
<lb/> | |||
in danger of hurting you: he therefore was | |||
<lb/> | |||
not conscious <del>that he was</del> of his being in any | |||
<lb/> | |||
such case in which punishment attaches | |||
<lb/> | |||
upon a man: <del>he has</del> no punishment i<del>n</del>s | |||
<lb/> | |||
before his eyes: whatever punishment therefore | |||
<lb/> | |||
really over hung him could not have any | |||
<lb/> | |||
effect upon his conduct: in other words it | |||
<lb/> | |||
could not but be inefficacious. | |||
<lb/> | |||
2. Being inefficacious, it would be of course | |||
<lb/> | |||
unprofitable; since it would occasion mischief | |||
<lb/> | |||
without preventing any. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1
C
Of Extenuations — Reasons
Question I
Why a total want of intention unaccompanied
by heedlessness is made a ground of extenuation:
insomuch as to exempt the party Defendant from
all punishment except what may be included
in compensation?
Reasons
1 Because any greater degree of punishment would
be groundless inefficacious. You r A person by
accident has hurt you: but by the supposition
he did not intend to hurt you: by the supposition
he was not so much as conscious of his being
in danger of hurting you: he therefore was
not conscious that he was of his being in any
such case in which punishment attaches
upon a man: he has no punishment ins
before his eyes: whatever punishment therefore
really over hung him could not have any
effect upon his conduct: in other words it
could not but be inefficacious.
2. Being inefficacious, it would be of course
unprofitable; since it would occasion mischief
without preventing any.
Identifier: | JB/071/014/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
071 |
penal code |
||
014 |
of extenuations - reasons |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
23417 |
|||