JB/071/085/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/085/003: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>C</head><lb/><head>Of Forgery.</head> <note>Definition</note><lb/>judgment formed by him that such facts did or did<lb/>not happen so and so, it has the effect of expressing  Assent: in<lb/>as far as they purport to be an expression of some act of his<lb/>Will, it has the effect of expressing <hi rend='underline'>Consent.</hi> <hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi><lb/>3. An assertion of an ordinary matter of fact is in effect <note>- Where the execution<lb/> imports Assent.</note><lb/>neither more nor less than the expression of an affirmative judg-<lb/>ment formed concerning the existence of such matter of fact;<lb/>for instance that Joseph is the son of Jacob whose discourse<lb/>the instrument purports to be. Of this nature are the recitals<lb/>in an ordinary deed. In this case it is an act of belief<lb/>that is expressed: an act of <gap/> understanding.<lb/>4. To this <del>will be</del> <add>is</add> added an expression of volition, if the <note>- Where it imports Consent.</note><lb/> instrument goes on and says that it is Thomas's will that<lb/>John<lb/> ----- <head>Note</head><lb/>(a) All the faculties of a man's mind are reducible to two, viz:<lb/>the understanding and the will: all the functions in like manner to two, intelliction and volition. In consequence whatever it is<lb/>which a man by the authentication of an instrument can testi-<lb/>:fy himself to have done, must <del>[<gap/> of one<lb/>kind or the other.]</del> consist in the exercise of one of those<lb/>faculties or the other.
<head>C</head><lb/><head>Of Forgery.</head>
 
<p><note>Definition</note><lb/>judgment formed by him that such facts did or did<lb/>not happen so and so, it has the effect of expressing  Assent: in<lb/>as far as they purport to be an expression of some act of his<lb/>Will, it has the effect of expressing <hi rend='underline'>Consent.</hi> <hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi></p>
 
<p>3. An assertion of an ordinary matter of fact is in effect <note>&#x2014; Where the execution<lb/> imports Assent.</note><lb/>neither more nor less than the expression of an affirmative judgment<lb/> formed concerning the existence of such matter of fact;<lb/>for instance that Joseph is the son of Jacob whose discourse<lb/>the instrument purports to be. Of this nature are the recitals<lb/>in an ordinary deed. In this case it is an act of belief<lb/>that is expressed: an act of the understanding.</p>
 
<p>4. To this <del>will be</del> <add>is</add> added an expression of volition, if the <note>&#x2014; Where it imports Consent.</note><lb/> instrument goes on and says that it is Thomas's will that <add>John</add> </p>
 
<head>Note</head>
<p><hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi> All the faculties of a man's mind are reducible to two, viz:<lb/>the understanding and the will: <add>all the functions in like manner to two, intelliction and volition.</add> In consequence whatever it is<lb/>which a man by the authentication of an instrument can testify <lb/>himself to have done, must <del>[be <gap/> in all of one<lb/>kind or the other.]</del> consist in the exercise of one of those<lb/>faculties or the other.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

C
Of Forgery.

Definition
judgment formed by him that such facts did or did
not happen so and so, it has the effect of expressing Assent: in
as far as they purport to be an expression of some act of his
Will, it has the effect of expressing Consent. (a)

3. An assertion of an ordinary matter of fact is in effect — Where the execution
imports Assent.

neither more nor less than the expression of an affirmative judgment
formed concerning the existence of such matter of fact;
for instance that Joseph is the son of Jacob whose discourse
the instrument purports to be. Of this nature are the recitals
in an ordinary deed. In this case it is an act of belief
that is expressed: an act of the understanding.

4. To this will be is added an expression of volition, if the — Where it imports Consent.
instrument goes on and says that it is Thomas's will that John

Note

(a) All the faculties of a man's mind are reducible to two, viz:
the understanding and the will: all the functions in like manner to two, intelliction and volition. In consequence whatever it is
which a man by the authentication of an instrument can testify
himself to have done, must [be in all of one
kind or the other.]
consist in the exercise of one of those
faculties or the other.




Identifier: | JB/071/085/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

of forgery

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f101 / f102 / f103 / f104

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23488

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in