★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/150/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/071/150/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head><del>3</del></head> | |||
<head>C</head><!-- centred --> | |||
<head>Of Defraudment by false standards</head><!-- centred --> | |||
<p>[<del>( )</del> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>Punishment <add><del><gap/></del></add> <note>1</note><!-- note in red --></head><!-- centred --> | |||
<p>For defrauding<add>(A)</add> by false standards . | |||
<lb/> | |||
1. Characteristic penance. See Tit. [Punishments] | |||
<lb/> | |||
Sect. This at all events. More or less public at discretion. | |||
<lb/> | |||
2. Rendering the knave's account <add><del>I</del></add>. See <add>Tit.</add> [Punishments.] Sect. | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>2</del>3. Forfeiture of the standards, if false in themselves. <add>This at <del>all events</del> <add>[all events.]</add> <del><unclear>option</unclear></del></add> <add>+</add> <note>+ See Tit. Frauds upon the coinage. Sect Punishment.</note> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>3</del>4. In other respects as for Simple mercantile defraudment. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>Exposition</head><!-- right of centre --> | |||
<p>(A) Defrauding . See <del>Sect</del> Tit. [Defraudment] The <sic>falshood</sic> | |||
<lb/> | |||
here consists in <del>the</del> <add>a man's</add> putting off the standards in question | |||
<lb/> | |||
for past standards and justly applied , when the case | |||
<lb/> | |||
is otherwise <add>To p. <del>3</del> <add>4</add> - N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> <del>2</del> 1</add><!-- addition in red --> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- horizontal line in red --> | |||
<head><add><del><unclear>Ago</unclear></del></add> Question I. <note>2</note><!-- note in red --></head><!-- centred --> | |||
<p><!-- indented -->Why the corporal ignominy <del>and the punishment | |||
<lb/> | |||
of rendering the knave's account are</del> is | |||
<lb/> | |||
made applicable in this case at all events? | |||
<lb/> | |||
whereas in the case of simple <del>M</del> mercantile | |||
<lb/> | |||
fraud <del>there are</del> <add>it is</add> left to the option of the Judge?. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>Reasons .</head> | |||
<p><!-- indented -->Because <del>the act</del> <add>in this <del>ac</del> case</add> <del>is the case of false standards</del> | |||
<lb/> | |||
the act is more strongly indicative of a | |||
<lb/> | |||
habit than in <add>the other.</add> <del>that of <gap/> <gap/>.</del> <add><del><gap/></del> See Introd . Ch | |||
<lb/> | |||
[Proportion &c] Rule 1. Explan. 3. By providing false standards</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
or practising the art of misapplying genuine ones | |||
<lb/> | |||
a man has provided for a regular and continued | |||
<lb/> | |||
course of fraud. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
3 C Of Defraudment by false standards
[( )
Punishment 1
For defrauding(A) by false standards .
1. Characteristic penance. See Tit. [Punishments]
Sect. This at all events. More or less public at discretion.
2. Rendering the knave's account I. See Tit. [Punishments.] Sect.
23. Forfeiture of the standards, if false in themselves. This at all events <add>[all events.] option</add> + + See Tit. Frauds upon the coinage. Sect Punishment.
34. In other respects as for Simple mercantile defraudment.
Exposition
(A) Defrauding . See Sect Tit. [Defraudment] The falshood
here consists in the a man's putting off the standards in question
for past standards and justly applied , when the case
is otherwise To p. 3 <add>4 - No 2 1</add>
Ago Question I. 2
Why the corporal ignominy and the punishment
of rendering the knave's account are is
made applicable in this case at all events?
whereas in the case of simple M mercantile
fraud there are it is left to the option of the Judge?.
Reasons .
Because the act in this ac case is the case of false standards
the act is more strongly indicative of a
habit than in the other. that of . See Introd . Ch
[Proportion &c] Rule 1. Explan. 3. By providing false standards
or practising the art of misapplying genuine ones
a man has provided for a regular and continued
course of fraud.
|
Identifier: | JB/071/150/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-2 |
|||
|
071 |
penal code |
||
|
150 |
defraudment by false standards |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[ec with crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]] |
||
|
23553 |
|||
