JB/072/117/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/117/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/117/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/117/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>8) Offences respecting the <hi rend='underline'>persons</hi> of <hi rend='underline'>Individuals</hi></head>
 
<p>are made subject to it, is <del>the only</del> <add>one of the <del>few</del></add> powers that are<lb/>
never given to any person for any other purpose<lb/>
than that of punishment. The reason is that it<lb/>
can be of use to nobody but as a means of punishment.<lb/>
<add><del>The whole <gap/></del></add> Power over things is in the whole circuit<lb/>
of it of obvious and intrinsic use to him <add>the</add><lb/>
<add>possessor.</add> who has it. It is <del>a</del> <add>the most ordinary</add> means and <note><add>indeed, almost</add> <del>honours excepted,</del></note> the only means<lb/>
which the Law, <add>by itself</add> can give a man of [procuring<lb/>
pleasure. Power] making an addition to his happiness.<lb/>
<del>Pow</del> Of <add>Among</add> Powers over persons, Power to inflict disablement,<lb/>
or personal restraint <del><gap/></del> may be <add>is</add> of use<lb/>
to a man for the purpose of [self-preservation]<lb/>
self defence. But the power of producing organical<lb/>
pain simply, without either disablement or personal<lb/>
restraint can be of no such use. It can<lb/>
therefore be of use <del>only for</del> for no other purpose than<lb/>
that of Punishment.</p>
 
<p>The difference between an act of Punishment and<lb/>
an act of Self-defence <del>in this</del> (both being <del>enacted</del><lb/>
exercised upon the person <del>of</del> of him who is the object]<lb/>
is this. An act of self-defence is an act done in<lb/>
the intent of putting a stop to a mischief [still] <add>subsisting:</add></p>
 
<head>NOTE.</head>
 
<p>It may, it is true, produce <add>a certain degree of</add> pleasure in the case where<lb/>
the person who possesses it happens to be <hi rend='underline'>angry</hi> with<lb/>
the person <add>in</add> whom it is exercised: a pleasure to wit, of<lb/>
the irascible appetite. But then this pleasure is<lb/>
from the very nature of it necessarily attended<lb/>
with a pain more than equivalent to it: so that <note>of the interests of the community upon the whole be attended to.</note><lb/>
it could never be given as a source of pleasure.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:06, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

8) Offences respecting the persons of Individuals

are made subject to it, is the only one of the few powers that are
never given to any person for any other purpose
than that of punishment. The reason is that it
can be of use to nobody but as a means of punishment.
The whole Power over things is in the whole circuit
of it of obvious and intrinsic use to him the
possessor. who has it. It is a the most ordinary means and indeed, almost honours excepted, the only means
which the Law, by itself can give a man of [procuring
pleasure. Power] making an addition to his happiness.
Pow Of Among Powers over persons, Power to inflict disablement,
or personal restraint may be is of use
to a man for the purpose of [self-preservation]
self defence. But the power of producing organical
pain simply, without either disablement or personal
restraint can be of no such use. It can
therefore be of use only for for no other purpose than
that of Punishment.

The difference between an act of Punishment and
an act of Self-defence in this (both being enacted
exercised upon the person of of him who is the object]
is this. An act of self-defence is an act done in
the intent of putting a stop to a mischief [still] subsisting:

NOTE.

It may, it is true, produce a certain degree of pleasure in the case where
the person who possesses it happens to be angry with
the person in whom it is exercised: a pleasure to wit, of
the irascible appetite. But then this pleasure is
from the very nature of it necessarily attended
with a pain more than equivalent to it: so that of the interests of the community upon the whole be attended to.
it could never be given as a source of pleasure.




Identifier: | JB/072/117/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

117

Info in main headings field

simple personal injuries / offences respecting the persons of individuals

Image

004

Titles

public mischief / exemptive circumstances / note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5 / e6 / e7 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23734

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in