★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<lb/>''[{{fullurl:JB/072/156/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'' | |||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
<head>7) Pers:<hi rend='superscript'>l</hi> Inj:<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> — Strictures.</head> | |||
<p><note>Defence of a Master no justification.</note> This miserable sophism is as inconsistent with other<lb/> | |||
doctrines of the Law in the matter of Justifiction<lb/> | |||
as it is with reason and utility. The Wife has no<lb/> | |||
action against a man for <add>the</add> beating <add>of</add> her Husband, [the<lb/> | |||
child for <add>the</add> beating <add>of</add> his Parent] than the Servant for the<lb/> | |||
beating of his master. Apt the Law allows the Wife<lb/> | |||
to defend her Husband: it is not so <del>[lost to]</del> <add>dead to all</add> social feeling,<lb/> | |||
as to forbid the child from defending his Parent: why<lb/> | |||
should it punish the servant for the defending of his<lb/> | |||
Master.</p> | |||
<p>If we may believe M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Buller, .... and.<lb/> | |||
that same Law which <sic>permitts</sic> a Master to defend his Servant<lb/> | |||
the Law [makes it a rule to] punishes the servant who<lb/> | |||
defends his master — <del>why for this notable reason that</del> <add>One cannot help being curious to</add><lb/> | |||
know the reason — it is this. <del>The Master it seems</del> <add><del>It is no matter</del></add><lb/> | |||
<del>may have an action for the ba</del> That the servant<lb/> | |||
should be beat is a matter of pecuniary damage to the<lb/> | |||
master: <add>for which the Law gives an action</add> but that the master should be beat is not a<lb/> | |||
matter of pecuniary damage to the servant: the Law<lb/> | |||
in this case allows <add>gives</add> no action. If then a man acts<lb/> | |||
from any other motive than a mercenary one, he is<lb/> | |||
to <add>be</add> punished for it. <add><del>When a man</del></add> What a man <add>person</add> is to do in order<lb/> | |||
to be safe is this. [<add>Of</add> When he sees [a man <add>any one</add> <add>He sees</add> beating his<lb/> | |||
master] his] If he <del>should happen <unclear>come</unclear> to see</del> his master<lb/> | |||
<del>beaten,</del> <add>in the hands of ruffians,</add> <del>let him suffer ever so</del> suffering <del>in danger</del><lb/> | |||
sinking and imploring his assistance. <del>he is to like</del> <add>Has he any thoughts</add><lb/> | |||
<del>care word by no means to think of giving it: but</del> <add>of giving it? No says the Law you shan't. I will tell</add> he is<lb/> | |||
<del>to fold his <gap/></del><add>you what you shall do. You shall stand still with your arms</add> across and say <add>to your Master — No.</add> I am never the<lb/> | |||
poorer for your being beat, what [is it I am] <add>should I be</add> to defend you<lb/> | |||
for? <note><del>If you but</del> often but to hold up a finger in <del>hi</del> defence of him and you shall be punished.</note> So <del>it</del> <add>the Law</add> serves the Servant: and if it could believe <add>the</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
7) Pers:l Inj:s — Strictures.
Defence of a Master no justification. This miserable sophism is as inconsistent with other
doctrines of the Law in the matter of Justifiction
as it is with reason and utility. The Wife has no
action against a man for the beating of her Husband, [the
child for the beating of his Parent] than the Servant for the
beating of his master. Apt the Law allows the Wife
to defend her Husband: it is not so [lost to] dead to all social feeling,
as to forbid the child from defending his Parent: why
should it punish the servant for the defending of his
Master.
If we may believe Mr Buller, .... and.
that same Law which permitts a Master to defend his Servant
the Law [makes it a rule to] punishes the servant who
defends his master — why for this notable reason that One cannot help being curious to
know the reason — it is this. The Master it seems It is no matter
may have an action for the ba That the servant
should be beat is a matter of pecuniary damage to the
master: for which the Law gives an action but that the master should be beat is not a
matter of pecuniary damage to the servant: the Law
in this case allows gives no action. If then a man acts
from any other motive than a mercenary one, he is
to be punished for it. When a man What a man person is to do in order
to be safe is this. [Of When he sees [a man any one He sees beating his
master] his] If he should happen come to see his master
beaten, in the hands of ruffians, let him suffer ever so suffering in danger
sinking and imploring his assistance. he is to like Has he any thoughts
care word by no means to think of giving it: but of giving it? No says the Law you shan't. I will tell he is
to fold his you what you shall do. You shall stand still with your arms across and say to your Master — No. I am never the
poorer for your being beat, what [is it I am] should I be to defend you
for? If you but often but to hold up a finger in hi defence of him and you shall be punished. So it the Law serves the Servant: and if it could believe the
Identifier: | JB/072/156/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
072 |
penal code |
||
156 |
pers:l inj:s - strictures |
||
003 |
assault |
||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
e5 / e6 / e7 / e8 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]] |
||
23773 |
|||