JB/072/162/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/162/004: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
operate as an exemption in favour of an act of
operate as an exemption in favour of an act of
<lb/>
<lb/>
the sort in question . [an act of temporary disablement]
the sort in question. [an act of temporary disablement]
<lb/>
<lb/>
<note>This case still less simple than either of the former &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> why -</note>  This case is not near so simple as either of the
<note>This case still less simple than either of the former &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> why-</note>  This case is not near so simple as either of the
<lb/>
<lb/>
former.  The reason will soon appear from what
former.  The reason will soon appear from what
Line 23: Line 23:
has been <del>already</del> <!-- white space --> <add>on a former occasion </add> remarked concerning the
has been <del>already</del> <!-- white space --> <add>on a former occasion </add> remarked concerning the
<lb/>
<lb/>
word Reputation .  Reputation is a substantive  
word Reputation.  Reputation is a substantive  
<lb/>
<lb/>
of the improper kind ; the entity it <del>characterises</del> <add>is the name of</add>
of the improper kind; the entity it <del>characterises</del> <add>is the name of</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
is <add>not a real but</add> a fictitious entity -  A man's person , his
is <add>not a real but</add> a fictitious entity -  A man's person, his
<lb/>
<lb/>
property , [I mean here any <hi rend='underline'>thin</hi>g , any <del><hi rend='underline'>portion</hi></del><!-- only the underlining has been deleted, not the word --> of  
property, [I mean here any <hi rend='underline'>thin</hi>g, any <del><hi rend='underline'>portion</hi></del><!-- only the underlining has been deleted, not the word --> of  
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add><sic>meatter</sic><!-- mis-spelling of 'matter' ? --></add> in which he can be said to have a property ,
<del><gap/></del> <add><sic>meatter</sic><!-- mis-spelling of 'matter' ? --></add> in which he can be said to have a property,
<lb/>
<lb/>
]<del>is</del> are real entities .  On this account we
]<del>is</del> are real entities.  On this account we
<lb/>
<lb/>
are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack
are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack
Line 41: Line 41:
different from that of an attack either
different from that of an attack either
<lb/>
<lb/>
upon <add>person or upon</add> property .  To attack a man's person or
upon <add>person or upon</add> property.  To attack a man's person or
<lb/>
<lb/>
his property , <del>is immed</del> [I speak not here of <gap/>
his property, <del>is immed</del> [I speak not here of incorporeal
<lb/>
<lb/>
property] is either immediately or <del><gap/></del> intermmediately
property] is either immediately or <del><gap/></del> intermmediately
Line 49: Line 49:
to <hi rend='underline'>touch</hi> them -  What reputation [speaking
to <hi rend='underline'>touch</hi> them -  What reputation [speaking
<lb/>
<lb/>
literally] is not any thing that can be <hi rend='underline'>touched</hi> .  
literally] is not any thing that can be <hi rend='underline'>touched</hi>.  
<lb/>
<lb/>
What is it then that is really done when <del>a man's</del>
What is it then that is really done when <del>a man's</del>
Line 56: Line 56:
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<p><note>Attack upon reputation - what</note>  A man's <sic>reputtation</sic> is said to be attacked ,[or a man
<p><note>Attack upon reputation - what</note>  A man's <sic>reputtation</sic> is said to be attacked,[or a man
<lb/>
<lb/>
is said to be attacked in his reputations, ] when by words
is said to be attacked in his reputations,] when by words
<lb/>
<lb/>
or other signs such ideas are raised in the minds of
or other signs such ideas are raised in the minds of
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add><del>m</del></add> persons on whom his happiness may chance to depend , as <add>have</add>
<add><del>m</del></add> persons on whom his happiness may chance to depend, as <add>have</add>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:06, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


12) Pers:l Inj:s Disabl:t temp:y

Defence of the Defender's [own] reputation. We now come to consi Reputation is the only remaining quarter in which
a man can be attacked - We now then come lastly
to consider whether Protection of a man's self against
an attack made upon his reputation ought also to
operate as an exemption in favour of an act of
the sort in question. [an act of temporary disablement]
This case still less simple than either of the former — why- This case is not near so simple as either of the
former. The reason will soon appear from what
has been already on a former occasion remarked concerning the
word Reputation. Reputation is a substantive
of the improper kind; the entity it characterises is the name of
is not a real but a fictitious entity - A man's person, his
property, [I mean here any thing, any portion of
meatter in which he can be said to have a property,
]is are real entities. On this account we
are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack
upon reputation bears wears a s an as such altogether
different from that of an attack either
upon person or upon property. To attack a man's person or
his property, is immed [I speak not here of incorporeal
property] is either immediately or intermmediately
to touch them - What reputation [speaking
literally] is not any thing that can be touched.
What is it then that is really done when a man's
reputation is said to be attacked?

Attack upon reputation - what A man's reputtation is said to be attacked,[or a man
is said to be attacked in his reputations,] when by words
or other signs such ideas are raised in the minds of
m persons on whom his happiness may chance to depend, as have



Identifier: | JB/072/162/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

162

Info in main headings field

pers:l injuries disablt tempory

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9 / e10 / e11 / e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23779

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in