JB/072/178/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/178/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/178/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/178/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
<head><note>Inserenda.</note> 13) Personal Injuries.</head>
 
<p><note><del>Errors.</del> <add>Strictures</add> Mayhem.</note> <add>[From p. 8]</add> pronounced upon <del>by</del> <add>before</add> a numerous audience, there<lb/>
seemed as little danger of a false judgment upon<lb/>
the question whether a man was maimed or no<lb/>
as <add>upon the question</add> whether he was of a certain age or no.<lb/>
I give these <del>reason</del> as reasons <del>why</del> that seem more<lb/>
likely than any others to have been given, if any<lb/>
<add>reasons at all</add> were <add>ever</add> given, <del>at</del> <add>for</add> the establishment of this eccentric<lb/>
<sic>practise</sic>: not that they in themselves were good for<lb/>
any thing. In the first place if a man's exhibiting<lb/>
his own person be the bearing witness in his<lb/>
own cause it is just as much so in the one case<lb/>
as in the other. If the rule holds good in every case<lb/>
that come within it, and this case is among <add>of</add><lb/>
the number of those that come within it, such inspection<lb/>
ought <del>at</del> <add>in</add> neither case to be recurred to.<lb/>
In the next place, whatever reason there may be for<lb/>
permitting the Judges to determine by the assistance<lb/>
of their own senses whether <del>a person is</del> damage is<lb/>
done to a <hi rend='underline'>person</hi> or no, there is <add>however</add> no better <add>nor other reason</add> than what<lb/>
there is for permitting the<del>se</del> <add>same persons</add> to determine by the<lb/>
same assistance whether damage is done to a <hi rend='underline'>thing</hi><lb/>
or no: the <hi rend='underline'>thing</hi> being supposed as portable as the<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>person</hi>. But this has <del>never</del> in no instance been<lb/>
ever done.</p>
 
<p><note>Ignominious injuries. Mischief of.</note> Where the outrage a man has sustained is violent<lb/>
and the pain of it acute, that pain may naturally<lb/>
be supposed to have been the end which the author<lb/>
had in view. There appears enough of it to satiate<lb/>
the enmity that <del><gap/></del> was the inducement to the outrage: <add>the</add></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:06, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Inserenda. 13) Personal Injuries.

Errors. Strictures Mayhem. [From p. 8] pronounced upon by before a numerous audience, there
seemed as little danger of a false judgment upon
the question whether a man was maimed or no
as upon the question whether he was of a certain age or no.
I give these reason as reasons why that seem more
likely than any others to have been given, if any
reasons at all were ever given, at for the establishment of this eccentric
practise: not that they in themselves were good for
any thing. In the first place if a man's exhibiting
his own person be the bearing witness in his
own cause it is just as much so in the one case
as in the other. If the rule holds good in every case
that come within it, and this case is among of
the number of those that come within it, such inspection
ought at in neither case to be recurred to.
In the next place, whatever reason there may be for
permitting the Judges to determine by the assistance
of their own senses whether a person is damage is
done to a person or no, there is however no better nor other reason than what
there is for permitting these same persons to determine by the
same assistance whether damage is done to a thing
or no: the thing being supposed as portable as the
person. But this has never in no instance been
ever done.

Ignominious injuries. Mischief of. Where the outrage a man has sustained is violent
and the pain of it acute, that pain may naturally
be supposed to have been the end which the author
had in view. There appears enough of it to satiate
the enmity that was the inducement to the outrage: the




Identifier: | JB/072/178/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

178

Info in main headings field

personal injuries

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e13 / e14 / e15 / e16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23795

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in