JB/072/181/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/181/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/181/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/181/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>C 3</head>
 
<head>Offences against one's Self.</head>
 
<p>the propensity to do mischief, that propensity <del>will</del><lb/>
in order to carry itself into effect must be productive<lb/>
of such acts as come under <del>the</del> one or another<lb/>
of the several species of <del>offendces</del> offences against<lb/>
other individuals.</p>
 
<p>In whatever way an offence of this class is<lb/>
mischievous, if it be mischievous to the public in<lb/>
the way of example it can only be so in proportion<lb/>
as it is mischievous to the individual: the public<lb/>
mischief of it can only be in proportion to the<lb/>
private mischief. This however does not hinder but<lb/>
that it may be right to [<del>inflict</del> <add>use considerable efforts annex</add> a considerable punishment]<lb/>
for the sake of the public to <add>suppress</add> an offence of which<lb/>
the mischief to the individual is scarce perceptible.<lb/>
This may happen on two accounts: either 1. because<lb/>
the mischief which is contingent only <add>is even plainly wanting</add> with<lb/>
respect to a given individual, may be certain with<lb/>
respect to a multitude of individuals: the <hi rend='underline'>extensiveness</hi><lb/>
of the mischief in this case compensating <sic>it's</sic> want<lb/>
of <hi rend='underline'>certainty</hi>: <note>It is not certain <add>for instance</add> that of two given persons set down to play at such or such a game, either of them will suffer any prejudice: but it may be certain (practically speaking) that if a thousand persons play at that game, many of them will do themselves essential prejudice.</note> or 2. because the mischief which though<lb/>
equal in every person it affects is too minute<lb/>
to <sic>shew</sic> itself in the instance of any single person<lb/>
becomes perceptible when it <del>extends itself</del> <add>affects a</add><lb/>
multitude at once: the <hi rend='underline'>extensiveness</hi> of the <del>offence</del><lb/>
mischief in this case makes up for its <add>deficiency in point</add> event of<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>magnitude</hi>. Thus Suicide if <del>carried</del> it spread <add>prevailed</add><lb/>
to a certain extent might by possibility prove<lb/>
dangerous to the safety of the state.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:06, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

C 3

Offences against one's Self.

the propensity to do mischief, that propensity will
in order to carry itself into effect must be productive
of such acts as come under the one or another
of the several species of offendces offences against
other individuals.

In whatever way an offence of this class is
mischievous, if it be mischievous to the public in
the way of example it can only be so in proportion
as it is mischievous to the individual: the public
mischief of it can only be in proportion to the
private mischief. This however does not hinder but
that it may be right to [inflict use considerable efforts annex a considerable punishment]
for the sake of the public to suppress an offence of which
the mischief to the individual is scarce perceptible.
This may happen on two accounts: either 1. because
the mischief which is contingent only is even plainly wanting with
respect to a given individual, may be certain with
respect to a multitude of individuals: the extensiveness
of the mischief in this case compensating it's want
of certainty: It is not certain for instance that of two given persons set down to play at such or such a game, either of them will suffer any prejudice: but it may be certain (practically speaking) that if a thousand persons play at that game, many of them will do themselves essential prejudice. or 2. because the mischief which though
equal in every person it affects is too minute
to shew itself in the instance of any single person
becomes perceptible when it extends itself affects a
multitude at once: the extensiveness of the offence
mischief in this case makes up for its deficiency in point event of
magnitude. Thus Suicide if carried it spread prevailed
to a certain extent might by possibility prove
dangerous to the safety of the state.




Identifier: | JB/072/181/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

181

Info in main headings field

offences against ones self

Image

003

Titles

general indemnity

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown emblem] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23798

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in