JB/073/030/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/030/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/030/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/030/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<!-- as the first two paragraphs appear to be deleted diagonally in pencil, delete tags have been added at the beginning and end of the aforementioned paragraphs -->
<head>C</head><!-- roughly centred -->
<!-- first horizontal line of header -->
<head>Torture</head><!-- roughly centred -->
<!-- second horizontal line of header -->
<p><!-- indent -->This is the most extensive <del><gap/></del> <add>sense</add> I like it
<lb/>
that care be given to <add>the word</add> Torture ; and I have <add>purposely</add> <del>referred</del>
<lb/>
<add>given this account of</add> it in order to comprise as well the cases in which
<lb/>
it is improperly <add>applied,</add> as these if any in which it
<lb/>
might be <add>proper to</add> <del>properly</del> appli<del>e</del>y<del>d</del><!-- the 'ie' has been amended to a 'y', and the 'd' has been deleted -->. it
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line in pencil -->
<p><!-- indent -->The arguments that I have seen hitherto
<lb/>
brought against it apply none of them to any
<lb/>
thing but the abuse; they do not therefore necessarily
<lb/>
conclude against the use. they might it
<lb/>
is true if the <del>use</del> <add>abuse</add> were inseparable from the use
<lb/>
but this will be found, I believe, not to be the
<lb/>
case.
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line in pencil -->
<p><add>Torture being thus explained , it</add> <del>It</del> may do something perhaps towards <del>for</del> removing
<lb/>
the prejudices <add>that are apt to be</add> entertained against it , if <del>it be <sic>shewn</sic></del> <add>it can <sic>shew</sic></add>
<lb/></p>
<p>1. That there are cases in which it is customary
<lb/>
<!-- indent -->to apply it, and in which nobody suspects [the
<lb/>
<!-- indent --><add>use of it <del>to</del></add> to be improper.] <del>it to be wrong.</del>
<lb/></p>
<p>2.  That it is <add>likely <del>or apt</del> to be</add> less penal, in other words <del>that</del> productive
<lb/>
of less hardship <add>upon the whole</add> <del>to the party</del> than other
<lb/>
applications which are commonly <sic>employ'd</sic> for the
<lb/>
same purposes and <del>with which nobody finds fault</del> <add>to which nobody objects</add>
<lb/></p>
<p>3.  That the very circumstance [<del>that distinguishes it</del> <add>by which alone it</add>
<lb/>
<del><unclear>from</unclear></del>] <del>from</del> <add>stands distinguished from</add> what is commonly called punishment,
<lb/>
is a circumstance that operates in <sic>it's</sic> favour.] <del>If <del>&amp;</del> tor<add>ture</add></del>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:07, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


C Torture

This is the most extensive sense I like it
that care be given to the word Torture ; and I have purposely referred
given this account of it in order to comprise as well the cases in which
it is improperly applied, as these if any in which it
might be proper to properly applieyd. it


The arguments that I have seen hitherto
brought against it apply none of them to any
thing but the abuse; they do not therefore necessarily
conclude against the use. they might it
is true if the use abuse were inseparable from the use
but this will be found, I believe, not to be the
case.


Torture being thus explained , it It may do something perhaps towards for removing
the prejudices that are apt to be entertained against it , if it be shewn it can shew

1. That there are cases in which it is customary
to apply it, and in which nobody suspects [the
use of it to to be improper.] it to be wrong.

2. That it is likely or apt to be less penal, in other words that productive
of less hardship upon the whole to the party than other
applications which are commonly employ'd for the
same purposes and with which nobody finds fault to which nobody objects

3. That the very circumstance [that distinguishes it by which alone it
from] from stands distinguished from what is commonly called punishment,
is a circumstance that operates in it's favour.] If & torture



Identifier: | JB/073/030/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

030

Info in main headings field

torture

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23870

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in