JB/073/067/001

Click Here To Edit

58 THEFT

in all its present Minuteness: is covering at once
all those Inlets to Impunity under equal guilt, which
an acute and interested Examination of the subsisting
Doctrine might discover.

But here again another Question
may occur (for it has already occurred to Writers + v. Hale's Hist. P.C le Common.
in other Words) whether the presence of this Consciousness
is to be left to the Jury,(to whom I refer the Cognizance
of it without Hesitation for the Reasons mentioned
under the word "Taking") to infer without further
Rule by their Discretion; without further rule or whether any such points
of Behaviour from which it may be conclusively infer'd by Law are
capable of being number'd & ascertained?

I have taken no small pains to find an
Answer to this Question, and the Results is that I
conceive they are reducible to one of these 4 viz:
1st.Concealment of the Act of taking 2d Concealment
afterwards of the Thing taken. 3d Concealment
of the taking Taker's own Person. 4th Flight.

I also carried on the Disquisition to a
still further Degree of Minuteness by tracing
out other Circumstances which being such wherefrom

Identifier: | JB/073/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	073	Main Headings	law in general
Folio number	067	Info in main headings field	theft
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f58
Penner		Watermarks	[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23907
Box Contents