★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head> | <head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head> | ||
argumenting in their | |||
few manifest < | <p>argumenting in their defence supposing<lb/>him to produce an argument which <lb/>for a moment might appear specious | ||
<lb/> | |||
need I in order to oppose it, <del>to broach</del><add>betake</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>enter into</del> <add>myself to</add> invective and exclamation? | |||
<lb/> | |||
nothing could be more impertinent or more | |||
<lb/> | |||
imprudent <note>in proportion as it was specious, it would appear, that I was flying from the contest: while standing firm on the ground of reason, the simple &c I(I might indeed with justice show my anger if getting <add>casting</add> off the habit of a reasoner, he were to betake himself to the painting instead of offensive Images of the enjoyment of the former of these <unclear>axioms</unclear></note> the simple <del>exposition</del><add>suggestion</add> of a<lb/> few manifest considerations would <sic>over-through</sic> | |||
<lb/> | |||
his argument into the mire | |||
<lb/> | |||
for it would be always easy to show, against | |||
<lb/> | |||
any partial considerations <add>speculations</add> whatsoever | |||
<lb/> | |||
to the contrary,that the infallible | |||
<lb/> | |||
tendancy of both these views <add>causes</add> if indulged | |||
<lb/> | |||
to the degree they would, without the <add>Law's</add> coercion<lb/> | |||
of the Laws, be indulged, is, to produce a | |||
<lb/> | |||
clear <sic>ballance</sic> of <del><gap/></del> <add>unhappiness</add> in a Society.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
NONCON. Crit. Review
argumenting in their defence supposing
him to produce an argument which
for a moment might appear specious
need I in order to oppose it, to broachbetake
enter into myself to invective and exclamation?
nothing could be more impertinent or more
imprudent in proportion as it was specious, it would appear, that I was flying from the contest: while standing firm on the ground of reason, the simple &c I(I might indeed with justice show my anger if getting casting off the habit of a reasoner, he were to betake himself to the painting instead of offensive Images of the enjoyment of the former of these axioms the simple expositionsuggestion of a
few manifest considerations would over-through
his argument into the mire
for it would be always easy to show, against
any partial considerations speculations whatsoever
to the contrary,that the infallible
tendancy of both these views causes if indulged
to the degree they would, without the Law's coercion
of the Laws, be indulged, is, to produce a
clear ballance of unhappiness in a Society.
|
Identifier: | JB/073/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
073 |
law in general |
||
|
093 |
noncon. crit. review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial lion motif]]] |
||
|
23933 |
|||
