JB/079/023/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/079/023/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- This document consists of two pages joined horizontally.  The top page has been transcribed first -->
<!-- This document consists of two pages joined horizontally.  The top page has been transcribed first -->
<head>Notoriety want of Prelud</head><lb/> <p>Now but is infinite to men to which he cannot<lb/> see an <add>no</add> End: but no end can he see to that<lb/>hearing <sic>wrapt</sic> up in <del>a number</del> of Books <add> Volumes </add> of <lb/> which he knows not the names nor so much <lb/> as the number, not <add>one of </add> which he may <hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> open <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi> during <lb/> his life.  Why should he open any of them? <lb/>When the purchase of his <sic>labor</sic> may be an eronious <lb/><note> <add>When </add> that means <del>is</del> <add> <foreign>iste</foreign></add> not whereby he </note>  Security, worse than the distracting ignorance <lb/> out of which it took him; <hi rend='superscript'><!-- symbol --></hi> when a <add> history to</add> rule of <lb/> <note><del> <gap/>he can <gap/></del> <add>might</add> from <add> what </add> he reads, what <add> returns </add> its force <add> &amp; what </add> has lost it, </note>Law is <del><gap/></del> <add> paying obedience </add> a Monarch, of whom speaking <lb/> <sic>allways.</sic> <add> ever</add> with <add> in </add> the same tone of Authenticity one <lb/> should never know whether he was against or <lb/> dispose.  Beyond the last reports <add> decisions</add> published, supposing <lb/> them to be of the last term, which they <lb/> never are &amp; the Statute of the last Session.<lb/>  There is <del>neither</del> <add> no one Volume </add> on which he can <add>rely</add> [with safety] <lb/> place his Trust.  If there be any one such  <lb/> Volume of original Law, for I speak not as </p><pb/> <p> <note>Notoriety <gap/></note> yet of Completions, I should be glad to see it, <lb/>for as yet I have looked for it in vain.</p> <p>I say not that there is not any one Volume <add> of a date prior to what has been (mentioned) </add> tho'<lb/> even this may be questionable) if which, were any <lb/> one to <del>compare</del> <add>collate</add> the contents of it with what <lb/> has <del> been</del> <add> arisen </add> since, <del>not a single while </del> <add> <del> every <gap/> </del></add> <add> it would be eventually </add> found that <lb/> every Article was in Force - but I say, that if <lb/> there be much on any (and were this is questionable <lb/> it is more than any man <add> can make sure of </add> a <gap/> ) can assure.<lb/> But we have Compilations: and well it is for <lb/> us that we have <add> these </add> compilations for without them <lb/> it would be <add> to every purpose of notoriety </add> I speak not of the People <add> multitude </add> only, but <lb/> of those who do nothing else than <add> but </add> study it, as if <lb/> no Law was in the Land. </p> <p>Tis these which take for each man what he <lb/> wants, or rather for ten or twenty men <add> at a time </add> of different <lb/> denominations what they want, <del> together </del> not <lb/> of the one, two or ten hundred times as much <lb/> with which they have no concern; &amp; thus </p> <pb/> <!-- start of lower page --> <p> it is that each man's share <add> part </add> is brought in some <lb/> degree within the sphere of his apprehension.</p> <p>  But if this <del>remedys comes</del> <add> remedy is cure </add> for the evil of <lb/> immunity to <add> by </add> which the original [Authorities] are <lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> overspread; </add> it has two of it's own to which <lb/> it is obnoxious in it's turn - In the first place <lb/> there is <del>no</del> <add> scarce any </add> compiler <!-- symbol  --><note><add> be his industry @ attention <del><gap/></del> what they will </add> </note> who can give absolute assurance <lb/> that he has seen every thing which it was requisite <lb/> for him to see: <add> even of that which is exposed to view now </add> in the second place, that <lb/> as <add> in </add> what he has seen <!-- symbol --> <note> <add> <add> be</add>his judgment what it will </add></note> he has in every instance <lb/> put that case which <del> gives a true account.</del> <add> is the true one. </add> </p> <p> Add to this, that what doctrine he states he must <lb/>deliver with hesitation; what doctrine is obscure, that he <lb/> <del><gap/></del> cast his own light upon it, if any light he found, he <lb/> must first represent in its obscurity: what two documents<lb/> clash he must represent as clashing  <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> who marks out the <add> track </add> of obedience  <add> with </add> the finger of authority </note> <lb/>  All these difficulties vanish before <hi rend='underline'>him</hi> [to whom <lb/>the supreme power has lent its' voice]: It matters <lb/> not to him whether the <gap/> was well or <add> right or </add> <lb/> ill <add> wrongly </add> taken of the Law that went before him <lb/> If he have <add> has he </add> omitted any thing of that which had he </p> <head>OMULGAT. Want of Abridgments inadequate <foreign>Succedanea</foreign></head><pb/> <p> <del> known it</del> <add><sic>consider'd</sic> </add> he would have chosen to insert, the <lb/> <unclear>Policy</unclear> of his work may suffer but it's authenticity <lb/> is unshaken and the same.</p> <p> <del>It's</del> <add> Does then a</add> doctrine waver, he forces it to the side, he <lb/> <del><gap/></del> pleases? <del> if it </del> <add> does it </add> speak <del>f</del> parables, <del><gap/></del> <lb/> makes it to speak plain:<del> if two Instances </del><add> are there any two</add> <lb/> <del>clash,</del> that <add><unclear>militate</unclear> </add>? he <del><gap/></del> setteth up one &amp; putteth <lb/> down the other </p> <p>  There still remains the inconvenience of having it's <lb/> verity superseded, to which the unauthentic compilation <lb/> of individuals &amp; the authoritative ones <lb/> of the State appear at first sight to be equally obnoxious. </p> <p> But this in the latter instance is easily <unclear>redrafted</unclear>:<lb/> It is but calling in <hi rend='superscript'>ca</hi> the old 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> edition <lb/> if one may so term it of the Law on that Title <lb/> &amp; republishing it with the novel <sic>emendations:</sic> &amp; <lb/> Tho' the <hi rend='underline'><gap/></hi> <add> Law </add> has <sic>suffer'd</sic> an alteration  <add> in its substance </add> its <lb/> Unity &amp; simplicity is still the same <gap/><lb/> as before <unclear>done</unclear> is but one Rule, &amp; that Rule <lb/>known. </p> <head>| [ ][XXVIII]</head> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
<head>Notoriety want of Prelud</head>
 
<p>Now but is infinite to men to which he cannot<lb/> see an <add>no</add> End: but no end can he see to that<lb/>hearing <sic>wrapt</sic> up in <del>a number</del> of Books <add> Volumes </add> of <lb/> which he knows not the names nor so much <lb/> as the number, not <add>one of </add> which he may <hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> open <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi> during <lb/> his life.  Why should he open any of them? <lb/>When the purchase of his <sic>labor</sic> may be an eronious <lb/><note> <add>When </add> that means <del>is</del> <add> <foreign>iste</foreign></add> not whereby he </note>  Security, worse than the distracting ignorance <lb/> out of which it took him; <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> when a <add> history to</add> rule of <lb/> <note><del> <gap/>he can <gap/></del> <add>might</add> from <add> what </add> he reads, what <add> returns </add> its force <add> &amp; what </add> has lost it, </note>Law is <del><gap/></del> <add> paying obedience </add> a Monarch, of whom speaking <lb/> <sic>allways.</sic> <add> ever</add> with <add> in </add> the same tone of Authenticity one <lb/> should never know whether he was against or <lb/> dispose.  Beyond the last reports <add> decisions</add> published, supposing <lb/> them to be of the last term, which they <lb/> never are &amp; the Statute of the last Session.<lb/>  There is <del>neither</del> <add> no one Volume </add> on which he can <add>rely</add> [with safety] <lb/> place his Trust.  If there be any one such  <lb/> Volume of original Law, for I speak not as </p>
 
<pb/>  
 
<head>Notoriety &amp;c</head>
<p> yet of Completions, I should be glad to see it, <lb/>for as yet I have looked for it in vain.</p>  
 
<p>I say not that there is not any one Volume <add> of a date prior to what has been (mentioned) </add> tho'<lb/> even this may be questionable) if which, were any <lb/> one to <del>compare</del> <add>collate</add> the contents of it with what <lb/> has <del> been</del> <add> arisen </add> since, <del>not a single while </del> <add> <del> every <gap/> </del> <add> it would be eventually </add></add>  found that <lb/> every Article was in Force - but I say, that if <lb/> there be much on any (and were this is questionable <lb/> it is more than any man <add> can make sure of </add> a person ) can assure.</p>
 
<p>But we have Compilations: and well it is for <lb/> us that we have <add> these </add> compilations for without them <lb/> it would be <add> to every purpose of notoriety </add> I speak not of the People <add> multitude </add> only, but <lb/> of those who do nothing else than <add> but </add> study it, as if <lb/> no Law was in the Land. </p>  
 
<p>Tis these which take for each man what he <lb/> wants, or rather for ten or twenty men <add> at a time </add> of different <lb/> denominations what they want, <del> together </del> not <lb/> of the one, two or ten hundred times as much <lb/> with which they have no concern; &amp; thus </p>  
 
<pb/> <!-- start of lower page -->  
 
 
<p> it is that each man's share <add> part </add> is brought in some <lb/> degree within the sphere of his apprehension.</p>  
 
<p>  But if this <del>remedys comes</del> <add> remedy is cure </add> for the evil of <lb/> immunity to <add> by </add> which the original [Authorities] are <lb/> <del>obnoxious</del> <add> overspread; </add> it has two of it's own to which <lb/> it is obnoxious in it's turn - In the first place <lb/> there is <del>no</del> <add> scarce any </add> compiler <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi>  be his industry @ attention <del><gap/></del> what they will </note> who can give absolute assurance <lb/> that he has seen every thing which it was requisite <lb/> for him to see: <add> even of that which is exposed to view now </add> in the second place, that <lb/> as <add> in </add> what he has seen <hi rend='superscript'>[||]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[||]</hi> <add> be</add> his judgment what it will </note> he has in every instance <lb/> put that case which <del> gives a true account.</del> <add> is the true one. </add> </p>  
 
<p> Add to this, that what doctrine he states he must <lb/>deliver with hesitation; what doctrine is obscure, that he <lb/> <del><gap/></del> cast his own light upon it, if any light he found, he <lb/> must first represent in its obscurity: what two documents<lb/> clash he must represent as clashing  <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> who marks out the <add> track </add> of obedience  <add> with </add> the finger of authority </note> <lb/>  All these difficulties vanish before <hi rend='underline'>him</hi> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> who works out the <add>track</add> of obedience <gap/> <add>with</add> the finger <add>of</add> authority</note> [to whom <lb/>the supreme power has lent its' voice]: It matters <lb/> not to him whether the <gap/> was well or <add> right or </add> <lb/> ill <add> wrongly </add> taken of the Law that went before him <lb/> If he have <add> has he </add> omitted any thing of that which had he </p>  
 
<head>OMULGAT. Want of Abridgments inadequate <foreign>Succedanea</foreign></head>
 
<pb/>  
 
<p> <del> known it</del> <add><sic>consider'd</sic> </add> he would have chosen to insert, the <lb/> Policy of his work may suffer but it's authenticity <lb/> is unshaken and the same.</p>
 
<p> <del>It's</del> <add> Does then a</add> doctrine waver, he forces it to the side, he <lb/> <del><gap/></del> pleases? <del> if it </del> <add> does it </add> speak <del>f</del> parables, <del><gap/></del> <lb/> makes it to speak plain:<del> if two Instances </del><add> are there any two</add> <lb/> <del>clash,</del> that <add>militates </add>? he <del><gap/></del> setteth up one &amp; putteth <lb/> down the other </p>  
 
<p>  There still remains the inconvenience of having it's <lb/> verity superseded, to which the unauthentic compilation <lb/> of individuals &amp; the authoritative ones <lb/> of the State appear at first sight to be equally obnoxious. </p>  
 
<p> But this in the latter instance is easily redressed:<lb/> It is but calling in <hi rend='superscript'>ca</hi> the old 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> edition <lb/> if one may so term it of the Law on that Title <lb/> &amp; republishing it with the novel <sic>emendations:</sic> &amp; <lb/> Tho' the <hi rend='underline'>instance</hi> <add> Law </add> has <sic>suffer'd</sic> an alteration  <add> in its substance </add> its <lb/> Unity &amp; simplicity is still the same <gap/><lb/> as before <unclear>done</unclear> is but one Rule, &amp; that Rule <lb/>known. </p>  
<head>| [ ][XXVIII]</head>  
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:07, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Notoriety want of Prelud

Now but is infinite to men to which he cannot
see an no End: but no end can he see to that
hearing wrapt up in a number of Books Volumes of
which he knows not the names nor so much
as the number, not one of which he may 2 open 1 during
his life. Why should he open any of them?
When the purchase of his labor may be an eronious
When that means is iste not whereby he Security, worse than the distracting ignorance
out of which it took him; [+] when a history to rule of
he can might from what he reads, what returns its force & what has lost it, Law is paying obedience a Monarch, of whom speaking
allways. ever with in the same tone of Authenticity one
should never know whether he was against or
dispose. Beyond the last reports decisions published, supposing
them to be of the last term, which they
never are & the Statute of the last Session.
There is neither no one Volume on which he can rely [with safety]
place his Trust. If there be any one such
Volume of original Law, for I speak not as


---page break---

Notoriety &c

yet of Completions, I should be glad to see it,
for as yet I have looked for it in vain.

I say not that there is not any one Volume of a date prior to what has been (mentioned) tho'
even this may be questionable) if which, were any
one to compare collate the contents of it with what
has been arisen since, not a single while every <add> it would be eventually </add> found that
every Article was in Force - but I say, that if
there be much on any (and were this is questionable
it is more than any man can make sure of a person ) can assure.

But we have Compilations: and well it is for
us that we have these compilations for without them
it would be to every purpose of notoriety I speak not of the People multitude only, but
of those who do nothing else than but study it, as if
no Law was in the Land.

Tis these which take for each man what he
wants, or rather for ten or twenty men at a time of different
denominations what they want, together not
of the one, two or ten hundred times as much
with which they have no concern; & thus


---page break---


it is that each man's share part is brought in some
degree within the sphere of his apprehension.

But if this remedys comes remedy is cure for the evil of
immunity to by which the original [Authorities] are
obnoxious overspread; it has two of it's own to which
it is obnoxious in it's turn - In the first place
there is no scarce any compiler [+] [+] be his industry @ attention what they will who can give absolute assurance
that he has seen every thing which it was requisite
for him to see: even of that which is exposed to view now in the second place, that
as in what he has seen [||] [||] be his judgment what it will he has in every instance
put that case which gives a true account. is the true one.

Add to this, that what doctrine he states he must
deliver with hesitation; what doctrine is obscure, that he
cast his own light upon it, if any light he found, he
must first represent in its obscurity: what two documents
clash he must represent as clashing + who marks out the track of obedience with the finger of authority
All these difficulties vanish before him + + who works out the track of obedience with the finger of authority [to whom
the supreme power has lent its' voice]: It matters
not to him whether the was well or right or
ill wrongly taken of the Law that went before him
If he have has he omitted any thing of that which had he

OMULGAT. Want of Abridgments inadequate Succedanea


---page break---

known it consider'd he would have chosen to insert, the
Policy of his work may suffer but it's authenticity
is unshaken and the same.

It's Does then a doctrine waver, he forces it to the side, he
pleases? if it does it speak f parables,
makes it to speak plain: if two Instances are there any two
clash, that militates ? he setteth up one & putteth
down the other

There still remains the inconvenience of having it's
verity superseded, to which the unauthentic compilation
of individuals & the authoritative ones
of the State appear at first sight to be equally obnoxious.

But this in the latter instance is easily redressed:
It is but calling in ca the old 2nd edition
if one may so term it of the Law on that Title
& republishing it with the novel emendations: &
Tho' the instance Law has suffer'd an alteration in its substance its
Unity & simplicity is still the same
as before done is but one Rule, & that Rule
known.

| [ ][XXVIII]



Identifier: | JB/079/023/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

023

Info in main headings field

happiness and unhappiness - their kinds - note

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d13 / / /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25465

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in